Peer review of teaching: using the nominal group technique to improve a program in a university setting with no previous experience

References

• Beaty, L., & McGill, I. (1995). Developing reflective practice: Observing teaching as a component of professional development. University of Brighton Media Services.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Mladenovic, R., & Segara, R. (2010). Supporting the reflective practice of tutors: What do tutors reflect on? Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903488139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. N., Parker, S., & Smigiel, H. (2012). Paired peer review of university classroom teaching in a school of nursing and midwifery. Nurse Education Today, 32(6), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhansali, P., & Goldman, E. (2018). A novel peer feedback programme of family-centred rounds. The Clinical Teacher, 15(6), 478–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2019). How have you been? On existential reflection and thoughtful teaching. In R. S. Webster & J. D. Whelen (Eds.), Rethinking Reflection and Ethics for Teachers (pp. 117–130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9401-1_8
   Google Scholar
• Bowen-Brady, H., Haag-Heitman, B., Hunt, V., & Oot-Hayes, M. (2019). Asking for feedback: Clinical nurses’ perceptions of a peer review program in a community hospital. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buskist, W., Ismail, E. A., & Groccia, J. E. (2014). A practical model for conducting helpful peer review of teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in Higher Education: International perspectives (Vol. 9, pp. 33–52). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, J., Brown, H., & Challen, D. (2010). Peer development as an alternative to peer observation: A tool to enhance professional development. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2010.497685
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, C., & O’Loughlin, D. (2014). Peer observation of teaching: Enhancing academic engagement for new participants. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.778067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, J., Tucker, J., & Estrada, C. (2013). Nominal group technique: A tool for course evaluation. Medical Education, 47(11), 1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S., Cant, R., Luders, E., Waters, D., Henderson, A., Hood, K., Reid-Searl, K., Ryan, C., Tower, M., & Willetts, G. (2020). The nominal group technique: Generating consensus in nursing research. The Journal of Nursing Education, 59(2), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20200122-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S. (2017). Evaluating a nursing erasmus exchange experience: Reflections on the use and value of the nominal group technique for evaluation. Nurse Education in Practice, 26, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiVall, M., Barr, J., Gonyeau, M., Matthews, S. J., Van Amburgh, J., Qualters, D., & Trujillo, J. (2012). Follow-up assessment of a faculty peer observation and evaluation program. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(4), 61. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe76461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbie, A., Rhodes, M., Tysinger, J. W., & Freeman, J. (2004). Using a modified nominal group technique as a curriculum evaluation tool. Family Medicine, 36(6), 402–406. https://fammedarchives.blob.core.windows.net/imagesandpdfs/pdfs/FamilyMedicineVol36Issue6Dobbie402.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. A. (2018). Peer observation of teaching: A practical tool in higher education. Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19455.82084
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., Hares, T., Spencer, J., Bradshaw, C., & Webb, I. (1993). The nominal group technique: A research tool for general practice? Family Practice, 10(1), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/10.1.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, I., James, R. W., Bischof, P., & Baroffio, A. (2017). Self-observation and peer feedback as a faculty development approach for problem-based learning tutors: A program evaluation. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 29(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1279056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley‐Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R., Meyer, L., Rawstorne, P., Razee, H., Chitkara, U., Mears, S., & Balasooriya, C. (2020). Evaluating and enhancing quality in higher education teaching practice: A meta- review. Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1730315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, G. D., & Oliver, G. R. (2012). Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.9.1.7
   Google Scholar
• Ives, J., Skelton, J., & Calvert, M. (2013). Module evaluation: A comparison of standard evaluation with nominal group technique. Education for Primary Care, 24(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2013.11493465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jayasekara, R. S. (2012). Focus groups in nursing research: Methodological perspectives. Nursing Outlook, 60(6), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2012.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. (2018). More than I expected: Reflections on being observed and reviewed as a pharmacy teacher. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning, 10(6), 803–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mager, D. R., Kazer, M. W., Conelius, J., Shea, J., Lippman, D. T., Torosyan, R., & Nantz, K. (2014). Development, implementation and evaluation of a peer review of teaching (PRoT) initiative in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 11(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2013-0019
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, C. E., Singh, A. T., Beck, J. B., Birnie, K., Fromme, H. B., Ginwalla, C. F., Griego, E., King, M., Maniscalco, J., Nazif, J., Patra, K. P., Seelbach, E., Walker, J. M., & Bhansali, P. (2019). Current practices and perspectives on peer observation and feedback: A national survey. Academic Pediatrics, 19(6), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2019.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. S., King, M., & Tully, M. P. (2016). How to use the nominal group and delphi techniques. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J. Y., Schullo-Feulner, A. M., Kolar, C., Lepp, G., Reidt, S., Undeberg, M. R., & Janke, K. K. (2018). Supporting formative peer review of clinical teaching through a focus on process. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy Tighe, S., & Bradshaw, C. (2013). Peer-supported review of teaching: Making the grade in midwifery and nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1347–1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, L. R., Roberts, D. H., & Frankl, S. E. (2019). Twelve tips for providing feedback to peers about their teaching. Medical Teacher, 41(10), 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1521953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngubane, N. I., & Gumede, S. C. (2017). Peer observation of teaching for professional development in higher education: Experiences of two novice lecturers across two disciplines. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(2), 245–260. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Peer-Observation-of-Teaching-for-Professional-in-of-Ngubane-Gumede/e298394e30b30872f079df1fcbcd78431fd077cc
   Google Scholar
• Pattison, A. T., Sherwood, M., Lumsden, C. J., Gale, A., & Markides, M. (2012). Foundation observation of teaching project – A developmental model of peer observation of teaching. Medical Teacher, 34(2), e136–e142. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.644827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, C. L., Lillie, E., Mathias, K., & McFarlane, T. (2019). Impact and attitudes about peer review of teaching in a Canadian pharmacy school. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(6), 6828. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., & Parsell, M. (2014). Introduction: The place of peer review in learning and teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in Higher Education: International perspectives (Vol. 9, pp. 1–9). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sauers-Ford, H. S., Hamline, M. Y., Tzimenatos, L., McKnight, H., Hamilton, C. M., McKennan, M. G., Rosenthal, J. L., & Working Group, P. A. C. E. S. (2019). You don’t know what you don’t know: Using nominal group technique to identify and prioritize education topics for regional hospitals. Hospital Pediatrics, 9(4), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2018-0217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz, K. K., & Latif, D. (2006). The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70(2), 32. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj700232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thampy, H., Bourke, M., & Naran, P. (2015). Peer-supported review of teaching: An evaluation. Education for Primary Care, 26(5), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2015.1079020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsingos, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., & Smith, L. D. (2014). Reflective practice and its implications for pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Delbecq, A. L. (1972). The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. American Journal of Public Health, 62(3), 337–342. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.62.3.337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar