Academic development for doctoral students: exploring the relevance of teaching-research integration, discipline-sensitivity and collaboration

References

• Assbring, L., & Nuur, C. (2017). What’s in it for industry? a case study on collaborative doctoral education in Sweden. Industry and Higher Education, 31(3), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422217705245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., & Stoncel, D. (2012). The impact of a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching in Higher Education on university lecturers appointed for their professional expertise at a teaching-led university: ‘It’s made me braver’. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2011.620107
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2020). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers D., & Gardiner, D. (2015). An evaluation framework for identifying the effectiveness and impact of academic teacher development programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2003). Learning and teaching policies: Mediations and contradictions of practice. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000137312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (2009). Forms of knowing and academic development practice. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902771937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshler, J., Dorner, H., & Renc-Roe, J. (2016). Peer teaching as an opportunity for enactment and academic practice in a higher education excellence in teaching certificate program. Higher Education Conference 2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Dorner, H., Misic, G., & Rymarenko, M. (2021). Online mentoring for academic practice: Strategies, implications, and innovations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1483, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertsema, J. (2016). Academic development, SoTL and educational research. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2016.1175144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2013). Reflections on the changing nature of educational development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2013.751691
   Google Scholar
• Giel, S. (2016). Vom Nutzen der programmtheorie in evaluationen im schulkontext. DDS – Die Deutsche Schule, 108(2), 149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Káplár-Kodácsy, K., & Dorner, H. (2020). Rebuilding faculty capacities in higher education: An alternative for relational mentoring. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1850318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., & Brook, P. (2001). Impact evaluation of educational development programs. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440110090749
   Google Scholar
• Leibowitz, B. (2014). Reflections on academic development: What is in a name? International Journal for Academic Development, 19(4), 357–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2014.969978
   Google Scholar
• Little, D., Green, D. A., & Hoption, C. (2018). A lasting impression: The influence of prior disciplines on educational developers’ research. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1458617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., & Åkerlind, G. (2010). Academic practice in a changing international landscape. In L. McAlpine & G. Åkerlind (Eds.), Becoming an academic: international perspectives (pp. 1-17). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). An introduction to scientific realist evaluation. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 405–418). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348896.n29
   Google Scholar
• Pleschova, G., & McAlpine, L. (2016). Helping teachers to focus on learning and reflect on their teaching: What role does teaching context play? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106551
   Google Scholar
• Renc-Roe, J., & Yarkova, T. (2013). Preparing doctoral students for a teaching career: The case of an international university with a history of a regional engagement. In E. Simon & G. Pleschová (Eds.), Designing and improving instructional development in a post-Soviet setting (pp. 19–33). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. J. (2000). Program theory: Not whether programs work, but how they work. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed., pp. 209–232). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, P. J. (2008). Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation, 14(1), 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers-Shaw, C., & Carr-Chellman, D. (2018). Developing care and socio-emotional learning in first year doctoral students: Building capacity for success. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.28945/4064
   Google Scholar
• Saroyan, A., & Trigwell, K. (2015). Higher education teachers’ professional learning: Process and outcome. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 46, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2005). Creating the future of faculty development: learning from the past, understanding the present. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. (2018). Academic development as cultural work: Responding to the organizational complexity of modern higher education institutions. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1366322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., Bilbow, G. T., Breslow, L., & van der Vaart, R. (2017). Strategic challenges in the development of teaching and learning in research-intensive universities. In B. Stensaker, G. T. Bilbow, L. Breslow, & R. van der Vaart (Eds.), Strengthening teaching and learning in research universities (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., van der Vaart, R., Solbrekke, T. D., & Wittek, L. (2017). The expansion of academic development: The challenges of organizational coordination and collaboration. In B. Stensaker, G. T. Bilbow, L. Breslow, & R. van der Vaart (Eds.), Strengthening teaching and learning in research universities (pp. 19–40). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. A. (2018). Holistic academic development: Is it time to think more broadly about the academic development project? International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1524571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sword, H. (2011). Archiving for the future: A longitudinal approach to evaluating a postgraduate certificate program. In L. Stefani (Ed.), Evaluating the effectiveness of academic development: Principles and practice (pp. 127–132). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J.-P.-L., & Nie, Y. (2015). The role of authentic tasks in promoting twenty-first century learning dispositions. In Y. H. Cho, I. S. Caleon, & M. Kapur (Eds.), Authentic problem solving and learning in the 21st century (pp. 19–39). Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar