Salamanca Statement and IDEA 2004: possibilities of practice for inclusive education

References

• Bejoian , L.M. and Reid , D.K. 2005 . A disability studies perspective on the Bush Education Agenda: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 . Equity and Excellence in Education , 38 ( 1 ) : 220 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Cawthon , S.W. 2007 . Hidden benefits and unintended consequences of No Child Left behind policies for students who are deaf or hard of hearing . American Educational Research Journal , 44 ( 3 ) : 460 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Chabbott , C. and Elliott , E.J. 2003 . Understanding others, educating ourselves , Washington, DC : National Academies Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cherryholmes , C. 1988 . Power and criticism: Poststructuralist investigations in education , New York : Teachers College Press .
   Google Scholar
• Darling‐Hammond , L. 2004 . “ From ‘Separate but Equal’ to ‘No Child Left Behind’: The collision of new standards and old inequities ” . In Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools , Edited by: Meier , D. and Woods , G. 3 – 32 . Boston, MA : Beacon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough , N. 1995 . Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language , Essex : Pearson Education .
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough , N. 2005 . Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism . Organization Studies , 26 ( 6 ) : 915 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri , B.A. and Connor , D.J. 2006 . Reading resistance , New York : Peter Lang .
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher , D.J. 2001 . Neutrality as a moral standpoint, conceptual confusion and the full inclusion debate . Disability and Society , 16 ( 5 ) : 637 – 54 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handler , B.R. 2006 . Two acts, one goal: Meeting the shared vision on No Child Left behind and Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 . The Clearing House , 80 ( 1 ) : 5 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Harry , B. and Klingner , J. 2006 . Why are so many minority students in special education? , New York : Teacher’s College Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hunt , T.C. 2005 . Education reforms: Lessons from history . Phi Delta Kappan , 87 ( 1 ) : 84 – 90 .
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone , B. 2008 . Discourse analysis , 2nd ed. , Malden, MA : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Karp , S. 2004 . “ NCLB’s selective vision of equality: Some gaps count more than others ” . In Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools , Edited by: Meier , D. and Wood , G. 53 – 65 . Boston, MA : Beacon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kim , J.S. and Sunderman , G.L. 2005 . Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for educational equity . Educational Researcher , 34 ( 8 ) : 3 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Meier , D. and Wood , G. , eds. 2004 . Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools , Boston, MA : Beacon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mertus , J.A. 2004 . Bait and switch: Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy , New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Nagle , K. , Yunker , C. and Malmgren , K.W. 2006 . Students with disabilities and accountability reform . Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 17 ( 1 ) : 28 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education . 1983 . A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform http://www.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html (accessed June 20, 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Palmaffy , T. 2001 . “ The evolution of the federal role ” . In Rethinking special education for a new century , Edited by: Finn , C. , Rotherham , A.J. and Hokanson , C.R. 1 – 21 . Washington, DC : Thomas B. Fordham Foundation/Progressive Policy Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Peters , S.J. 2007 . ‘Education for All?’ A historical analysis on international inclusive education policy and individuals with disabilities . Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 18 ( 2 ) : 98 – 109 .
   Google Scholar
• Riester‐Wood , A. 2004 . “ Accountability for special education students: Beginning quality education ” . In Educational equity and accountability: Paradigms, policies and politics , Edited by: Skrla , L. and Scheurich , J.J. 267 – 74 . New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Rix , J. After inclusion: Using language to maintain the drive for social justice in learning . Paper Presented at ECER (European Conference of Educational Research) . September 9–12 , Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Sizemore , B.A. n.d. . Segregation/desegregation: Fifty years after the Brown v. Board decision http://www.illinoisbrownvboard.org/article/sizemore2.htm (accessed June 12, 2008)
   Google Scholar
• Sizer , T.R. 2004 . “ Preamble: A reminder for Americans ” . In Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools , Edited by: Meier , D. and Wood , G. xvii – xxii . Boston, MA : Beacon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Skrtic , T.M. , ed. 1995 . Disability and democracy , New York : Teachers College Press .
   Google Scholar
• Slee , R. 2007 . “ Inclusive schooling as a means and end of education? ” . In The Sage handbook of special education , Edited by: Florian , L. 160 – 70 . London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , T.E.C. 2005 . IDEA 2004: Another round in the reauthorization process . Remedial and Special Education , 26 ( 6 ) : 314 – 9 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderman , G.L. , Kim , J.S. and Orfield , G. 2005 . NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field , Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , S. 2001 . “ Locating and conducting discourse analytic research ” . In Discourse as data , Edited by: Wetherell , M. , Taylor , S. and Yates , S. 5 – 48 . Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , S.J. 2004 . Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment . Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities , 29 ( 4 ) : 218 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull III , H.R. 2005 . Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Reauthorization: Accountability and personal responsibility . Remedial and Special Education , 26 ( 6 ) : 320 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO and Ministry of Education and Science Spain . 1994 . The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on special needs education , Spain : UNESCO .
   Google Scholar
• Voltz , D.L. and Fore III , C. 2006 . Urban special education in the context of standards‐based reform . Remedial and Special Education , 27 ( 6 ) : 329 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner , M. , Newman , L. , Cameto , R. , Levine , P. and Garza , N. 2006 . An overview of findings from Wave 2 of the National Longitudinal Study‐2(NLTS2) , Washington, DC : Institute of Education Sciences .
   Google Scholar
• Wodak , R. and Meyer , M. 2001 . Methods of critical discourse analysis , London : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Wood , G. 2004 . “ A view from the field: NCLB’s effects on classrooms and schools ” . In Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools , Edited by: Meier , D. and Wood , G. 32 – 50 . Boston, MA : Beacon Press .
   Google Scholar