Beyond the far too incessant schism: special education and the social model of disability

References

• APA (American Psychiatric Association) 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM – IV (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• APA (American Psychiatric Association) 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM – IV - TR (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasiou, D., and J. M. Kauffman. 2010. Disability as Cultural Difference: Implications for Special Education. Remedial and Special Education. Published online September 24. doi:10. 1177/0741932510383163. Accessed July 14, 2011. http://rse.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/09/21/0741932510383163
   Google Scholar
• Anastasiou, D., and J. K. Kauffman. 2011. “A Social Constructionist Approach to Disability: Implications for Special Education.” Exceptional Children 77 (3): 367–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., G. Mercer, and T. Shakespeare. 1999. Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baynton, D. C. 2001. “Disability and the Justification of Inequality in American History.” In The New Disability History: American Perspectives, edited by P. Longmore and L. Umansky, 33–57. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, R. J. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. P. 1992. Schooling Without Labels: Parents, Educators, and Inclusive Education. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biklen, D. P. 2006. Autism and the Myth of the Person Alone. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchett, W. J. 2006. “Disproportionate Representation of African Americans in Special Education: Acknowledging the Role of White Privilege and Racism.” Educational Researcher 35 (6): 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Blomgren, R. 1993. “Special Education and the Quest for Human Dignity.” In Critical Issues in American Education: Towards the 21st Century, edited by H. S. Shapiro and D. E. Purpel, 230–245. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., and D. P. Biklen. 1977. “Handicapism.” Social Policy 7 (5): 14–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brantlinger, E. A. 2004. “Confounding the Needs and Confronting the Norms: An Extension of Reid and Valle's Essay.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (6): 490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E. A., ed. 2006. Who Benefits from Special Education?: Remediating Other People's Children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, J. I. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. J. 2008. Urban Narratives: Portraits in Progress – Life at the Intersections of Learning Disability, Race and Social Class. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, L. 1996. “Including All of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability.” In Encounters with Strangers: Feminism and Disability, edited by J. Morris, 206–227. London: Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S. 2009. The Incomplete Child: An Intellectual History of Learning Disabilities. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Danforth, S., and S. J. Gabel. 2006. Vital Questions Facing Disability Studies in Education. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. 1995. Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. 1997. “Constructing Normalcy.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by L. J. Davis, 2nd ed, 3–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. 2002. Bending over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism & Other Difficult Positions. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley-Marling, C., and A. Gurn, eds. 2010. The Myth of the Normal Curve. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley-Marling, C., and P. Paugh. 2010. “Confronting the Discourse of Deficiencies.” Disability Studies Quarterly 30 (2). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/1241/1285
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. 1968. “Special Education for the Mentally Retarded: Is Much of it Justifiable?” Exceptional Children 35: 5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. 2011. Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N., and K. Mutua. 2005. “‘I am a Woman Now!': Rewriting Cartographies of Girlhood from the Critical Standpoint of Disability.” In Geographies of Girlhood: Identity In-between, edited by P. Bettis and N. Adams, 253–270. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A., and D. J. Connor. 2005. “In the Shadow of ‘Brown': Special Education and the Overrepresentation of Students of Color.” Remedial and Special Education 26 (2): 93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A., and D. J. Connor. 2006. Reading Resistance: Discourses of Exclusion in Desegregation and Inclusion Debates. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A., and D. J. Connor. 2009. “‘I was the Special ed. Girl': Urban Working-Class Young Women of Colour.” Gender and Education 22 (1): 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, D. Z., and F. Zames. 2001. The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. 1987. “The First Crusade for Learning Disabilities: The Movement for the Education of Backward Children.” In The Formation of School Subjects: The Struggle for Creating an American Institution, edited by T. Popkewitz, 190–209. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• French, S. 1993. “Disability, Impairment or Something in Between.” In Disabling Barriers, Enabling Environments, edited by J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, and C. Thomas, 17–25. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. 1975. Truth and Method. Translated and edited by G. Barden & J. Cumming. New York: Seabury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. J. 1998. “The Scientific Knowledge Base of Special Education: Do We Know What We Think We Know.” Exceptional Children 64 (4): 493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, D. J. 2006. “If Not Absolute Objectivity, Then What? A Reply to Kauffman and Sasso.” Exceptionality 14 (2): 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2001. “‘Learning Difficulties,’ The Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies.” Disability and Society 16 (2): 207–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harry, B., and J. Klingner. 2006. Why Are So Many Minority Students in Special Education? New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelrigg, L. 1989. A Wilderness of Mirrors: On Practices of Theory in a Gray Age. Tallahassee: The Florida State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hehir, T. 2002. “Eliminating Ableism in Education.” Harvard Educational Review 72 (1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heshusius, L. 1989. “The Newtonian Mechanistic Paradigm, Special Education, and Contours of Alternatives: An Overview.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 22 (7): 403–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P. 1998. “A Critical Condition.” In The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives, edited by T. Shakespeare, 7–19. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M., & J. W. Lloyd. 2011. “Statistics, Data, and Special Education Decisions: Basic Links to Realities.” In Handbook of Special Education, edited by J. M. Kauffman and D. P. Hallahan, 27–36. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M., and G. M. Sasso. 2006a. “Toward Ending Cultural and Cognitive Relativism in Special Education.” Exceptionality 14 (2): 65–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, J. M., and G. M. Sasso. 2006b. “Certainty, Doubt, and the Reduction of Uncertainty: A Rejoinder.” Exceptionality 14 (2): 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, C. H. 1996. Label-Free Learning: Supporting Learners with Disabilities. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longmore, P. K. 2003. Why I Burned My Book and Other Essays on Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Losen, D. J., and G. Orfield, ed. 2002. Racial Inequity in Special Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue. 2nd ed. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need Virtues. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. R. 1973. Labeling the Mentally Retarded: Clinical and Social System Perspectives on Mental Retardation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2004. “If I Had a Hammer: The Social Model in Action.” In Implementing the Social Model of Disability: Theory and Research, edited by C. Barnes, 18–31. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1993. “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality.” In On Human Rights: The 1993 Oxford Amnesty Lectures, edited by S. Hurley and S. Shute, 112–134. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson 2002. “The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology.” Research in Social Science and Disability 2: 9–28. doi: 10.1016/S1479-3547(01)80018-X.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. P. 1993. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. E. 1987. “Why Are There Learning Disabilities? A Critical Analysis of the Birth of the Field in Its Social Context.” In The Formation of School Subjects: The Struggle for Creating an American Institution, edited by T. S. Popkewitz, 210–237. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, A. 1981. Disabled We Stand. London: Souvenir Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J. 2006. “Foreword: Before It Had a Name: Exploring the Historical Roots of Disability Studies in Education.” In Vital Questions Facing Disability Studies in Education, edited by S. Danforth and S. L. Gabel, xiii–xxiii. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. 1979. Naturalism and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004a. “Rescuing a Social Relational Understanding of Disability.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 6 (1): 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004b. “How Is Disability Understood?” Disability and Society 19 (6): 563–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. 1998. “Feminist Approaches to Naturalizing Disabled Bodies, or Does the Social Model of Disablement Rest upon a Mistake.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Disability Studies, Oakland, CA, June 24.
   Google Scholar
• Tremain, S. 2002. “On the Subject of Impairment.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, 32–47. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. W. 1994. Inventing the Feeble Mind: A History of Mental Retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. 1976. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: UPIAS.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, R. R. 2010. Dismantling Contemporary Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1958. The Philosophical Investigations. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zola, I. K. 1982. Missing Pieces: A Chronicle of Living with a Disability. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar