Up or down and out? A systemic analysis of young people's educational pathways in the youth justice system in England and Wales

References

• Attwood, G., P. Croll, and J. Hamilton. 2004. “Challenging Students in Further Education: Themes Arising from a Study of Innovative FE Provision for Excluded and Disaffected Young People.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 28 (1): 107–119. doi: 10.1080/0309877032000161850
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. 2010. Against the Odds. Targeted Briefing – Young Offenders. London: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, K., S. Jones, C. Roberts, and S. Merrington. 2003. “The Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Youth Justice Board’s Assessment for Young Offenders: Findings from the First Two Years of the Use of ASSET”. http://www.yjb.gov.uk/Publications/Scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=84&eP=
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2013. The Education Debate, 2nd ed. London: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1994. “Rethinking the State: On the Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory 12 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.2307/202032
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1998. Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data Analysis: Complementary Strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K., A. Sutherland, and C. Roberts. 2007. Keeping Young People Engaged: Improving Education, Training and Employment Opportunities for Serious and Persistent Young Offenders. London: Youth Justice Board.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2010. The Importance of Teaching. The Schools White Paper 2010. Cm7980. London: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. 2007. “Childhood Risk Factors and Risk-focused Prevention.” In The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, edited by M. Maguire, R. Morgan, and R. Reiner, 602–640. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gazeley, L., T. Marrable, C. Brown, and J. Boddy. 2013. Reducing Inequalities in School Exclusion: Learning from Good Practice. A Report to the Office of the Children's Commissioner from the Centre for Innovation and Research in Childhood and Youth. Brighton: University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. 2009. “The Political Economy of Risk and the New Governance of Youth Crime.” Punishment & Society 11 (4): 443–458. doi: 10.1177/1462474509341141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P. 2008. “Understanding Career Decision-making and Progression: Careership Revisited.” John Killeen Memorial Lecture, London, October 16, 2008. http://www.crac.org.uk/CMS/files/upload/fifth_johnkilleenlecturenotes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hurry, J., and V. Moriarty. 2004. “The National Evaluation of the Youth Justice Board’s Education, Training and Employment Projects.” http://www.yjb.gov.uk/publications/Resources/Downloads/ETEfull.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lanskey, C. 2010. “Citizenship Education for Young People in Secure Institutions in England and Wales.” Educação, Sociedade & Culturas 30: 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. 2012. “Disengaged and Disaffected Young People: Surviving the System.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (2): 261–279. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.541553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, G., and M. Mills. 2012. “Alternative Education Sites and Marginalised Young People: ‘I Wish There Were More Schools Like this One’.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 16 (8): 843–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. 2011. “Asset – Young Offender Assessment Profile.” Accessed June 12, 2014. https://www.justice.gov.uk/youth-justice/assessment/asset-young-offender-assessment-profile
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. 2003. “Principles of Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research Design.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddlie, 189–208. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2010. “Transition Through Detention and Custody. Arrangements for Learning and Skills for Young People in Custodial or Secure Settings.” http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Publications-and-research/Browse-all-by/Documents-by-type/Thematic-reports/Transition-through-detention-and-custody
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2000. “The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry.” In Case Study Method, edited by M. Hammersley, R. Gomm, and P. Foster, 18–27. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M. 2007. Education, Youth Justice and Social Inclusion. Collumpton: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2010. “Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare and Social Insecurity.” Sociological Forum 25 (2): 197–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youth Justice Board. 2005. Keeping Young People Engaged Year 2: Final Report. London: Youth Justice Board.
   Google Scholar
• Youth Justice Board. 2006. Barriers to Engagement in Education, Training and Employment. London: Youth Justice Board.
   Google Scholar
• Youth Justice Board/Ministry of Justice. 2014. Youth Justice Statistics 2011/12. England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice. www.gov.uk/government/publications/youth-justice-statistics
   Google Scholar