Storying disability’s potential

References

• Aukerman, M., and L. Chambers Schuldt. 2017. “Bucking the Authoritative Script of a Mandated Curriculum.” Curriculum Inquiry 47: 411–437. iFirst publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2017.1368353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, G., A. Snyder, and M. Henderson. 2012. “Using Mobile Phones as Placed Resources for Literacy Learning in a Remote Indigenous Community in Australia.” Language and Education 26 (4): 279–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.691512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2006. Education Policy and Social Class: The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, P. 1998. “Bridging ‘Mainstream’ and ‘Special Education’: A Curriculum Problem.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 20 (4): 327–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2016. The Senate Education and Employment References Committee Report: Access to Real Learning: The Impact of Policy, Funding and Culture on Students with Disability. Canberra: Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, L. 1996. “Including All of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability.” In Exploring the Divide, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 55–72. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J., ed. 2010. The Disability Studies Reader. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. 2005. “Understanding Curriculum as Normalizing Text: Disability Studies Meet Curriculum Theory.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (4): 421–439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erevelles, N. 2011. Disability and Difference in Global Contexts: Enabling a Transformative Body Politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. “Two Lectures.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, edited by C. Gordon, 78–108. Oxford: The Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland Thomson, R. 2005. “Feminist Disability Studies.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30 (2): 1557–1587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/423352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2007. “Towards Socially Just Pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian Critical Disability Studies.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 11 (3): 317–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701238769
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2016. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. Forthcoming-a. “Disability Studies & Human Encounters.” In Disability Studies: A Reader, edited by A. Ghai. Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. Forthcoming-b. Disability and Other Human Questions. London: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, N. 2004. “RhizomANTically Becoming-cyborg: Performing Posthuman Pedagogies.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (3): 253–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Gough, N. 2010. “Performing Imaginative Inquiry: Narrative Experiments and Rhizosemiotic Play.” In Imagination in Educational Theory and Practice: A Many-sided Vision, edited by T. W. Nielsen, R. Fitzgerald, and M. Fettes, 42–60. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Grumet, M. R. 1981. “Restitution and Reconstruction of Educational Experience: An Autobiographical Method for Curriculum Theory.” In Rethinking Curriculum Studies: A Radical Approach, edited by M. Lawn and L. Barton, 115–130. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Hatlen, P. 1996. “The Core Curriculum for Blind and Visually Impaired Students, Including Those with Additional Disabilities.” RE: View 28: 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2015. “What Can a Foucauldian Analysis Contribute to Disability Theory?” In Foucault and the Government of Disability. Enlarged and Revised ed, edited by S. Tremain, 78–92. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleege, G. 1999. Sight Unseen. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Letts, W. 2013. “The Curriculum.” In Teaching: Making a Difference. 2nd ed., edited by R. Churchill, P. Ferguson, S. Godinho, N. Johnson, A. Keddie, W. Letts, and M. Vick, 184–207. Milton: Wiley Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Liddiard, K., K. Runswick-Cole, D. Goodley, S. Whitney, E. Vogelmann, and L. Watts. 2018. “‘I Was Excited by the Idea of a Project that Focuses on Those Unasked Questions’ Co-producing Disability Research with Disabled Young People.” Children & Society.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 1992. “Personal and Political: A Feminist Perspective on Researching Physical Disability.” Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2): 157–166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780181
   Google Scholar
• Moss, J., and K. Harvie. 2015. “Cross-curriculum Design: Enacting Inclusive Pedagogy and Curriculum.” In Inclusive Pedagogy Across the Curriculum, edited by J. M. Deppeler, T. Loreman, R. Smith, and L. Florian, 459–480. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2009. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. F., and M. R. Grumet. 1976. Toward a Poor Curriculum. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F., and B. Lingard. 2010. Globalizing Education Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2008. “Repositioning Mothers: Mothers, Disabled Children and Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 23 (3): 199–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590801953937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandlin, J. A., B. D. Schultz, and J. Burdick. 2010. “Understanding, Mapping, and Exploring the Terrain of Public Pedagogy.” In Handbook of Public Pedagogy: Education and Learning Beyond Schooling, edited by J. A. Sandlin, B. D. Schultz, and J. Burdick, 1–6. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T., and R. Michalko. 2009. “Introduction.” In Rethinking Normalcy: A Disability Studies Reader, edited by T. Titchkosky and R. Michalko, 1–14. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traustadóttir, R. 1991. “Mothers Who Care: Gender, Disability and Family Life.” Journal of Family Issues 12 (2): 211–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251391012002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, L. 2001. “Writing, Identity, and the Other: Dare We Do Disability Studies?” Journal of Teacher Education 52 (2): 107–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487101052002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitburn, B. 2014. “The Indelible Ink of the Special Stamp: An Insider’s Research Essay on Imprints and Erasures.” Disability and Society 29 (4): 624–637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.844097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitburn, B., and R. Michalko. Forthcoming. “Blindness/Sightedness: Disability Studies and the Defiance of Di-vision.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. 2nd ed., edited by N. Watson and S. Vehmas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar