Teachers’ subjective theories regarding social dynamics management and social participation of students with Intellectual Disabilities in inclusive classrooms

References

• Anderson, A., J. Locke, M. Kretzmann, and C. Kasari. 2016. “Social Network Analysis of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Predictors of Fragmentation and Connectivity in Elementary School Classrooms.” Autism 20 (6): 700–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asher, S., P. Renshaw, and S. Hymel. 1982. “Peer Relations and the Development of Social Skills.” The Young Child: Reviews of Research 3: 137–158.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E. 2010. “Social Relationships of Pupils with Special Educational Needs in the Mainstream Primary Class: Peer Group Membership and Peer-Assessed Social Behaviour.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25 (4): 413–429.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., V. Strogilos, K. Aroni, and C. Kantaraki. 2017. “Using Sociometric Techniques to Assess the Social Impacts of Inclusion: Some Methodological Considerations.” Educational Research Review 20: 68–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortz, J., and N. Döring. 2006. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, J., and C. Schuster. 2010. Statistik. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bossaert, G., H. Colpin, S. Pijl, and K. Petry. 2013. “Truly Included? A Literature Study Focusing on the Social Dimension of Inclusion in Education.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (1): 60–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossaert, G., A. de Boer, P. Frostad, S. Pijl, and K. Petry. 2015. “Social Participation of Students with Special Educational Needs in Different Educational Systems.” Irish Educational Studies 34 (1): 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, S., K. Zadzora, A. Miller, and S. Gest. 2019. “Predicting Elementary Teachers’ Efforts to Manage Social Dynamics from Classroom Composition, Teacher Characteristics, and the Early Year Peer Ecology.” Social Psychology of Education 22 (4): 795–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. 1989. “Ecological Systems Theory.” Annals of Child Development 6: 187–249.
   Google Scholar
• Bukowski, W., and B. Hoza. 1989. “Popularity and Friendship: Issues in Theory, Measurement, and Outcome.” In Wiley Series on Personality Processes. Peer Relationships in Child Development, edited by T. J. Berndt and G. W. Ladd, 15–45. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cillessen, A., and A. Rose. 2005. “Understanding Popularity in the Peer System.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (2): 102–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dann, H.-D. 1990. “Subjective Theories: A New Approach to Psychological Research and Educational Practice.” In Everyday Understanding, edited by G. R. Semin, and K. J. Gergen, 227–243. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, H.-D. 1994. “Pädagogisches Verstehen: Subjektive Theorien und erfolgreiches Handeln von Lehrkräften.” In Verstehen. Psychologischer Prozess und didaktische Aufgabe, edited by K. Reusser, and M. Reusser-Weyeneth, 163–182. Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, M., K. Norwalk, C. Chen, J. Hamm, and T. Farmer. 2019. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Self-and Peer-Identified Victims.” School Mental Health 11 (4): 819–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, A., S. Pijl, W. Post, and A. Minnaert. 2013. “Peer Acceptance and Friendships of Students with Disabilities in General Education: The Role of Child, Peer, and Classroom Variables.” Social Development 22 (4): 831–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, R., A. de Boer, J. Bijstra, and A. Minnaert. 2018. “Teacher Strategies to Support the Social Participation of Students with SEBD in the Regular Classroom.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 33 (3): 412–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J., and S. Gest. 2015. “Peer Norm Salience for Academic Achievement, Prosocial Behavior, and Bullying: Implications for Adolescent School Experiences.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 35 (1): 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T., M. Dawes, J. Hamm, D. Lee, M. Mehtaji, A. Hoffman, and D. Brooks. 2018. “Classroom Social Dynamics Management: Why the Invisible Hand of the Teacher Matters for Special Education.” Remedial and Special Education 39 (3): 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T., J. Hamm, M. Dawes, K. Barko-Alva, and J. Cross. 2019. “Promoting Inclusive Communities in Diverse Classrooms: Teacher Attunement and Social Dynamics Management.” Educational Psychologist 54 (4): 286–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R., E. Carter, J. Asmus, and M. Brock. 2016. “Presence, Proximity, and Peer Interactions of Adolescents with Severe Disabilities in General Education Classrooms.” Exceptional Children 82 (2): 192–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garotte, A. 2017. “Relationship between the Social Participation and Social Skills of Pupils with an Intellectual Disability: A Study in Inclusive Classrooms.” Frontline Learning Research 5 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Garrote, A., R. Dessemontet, and E. Moser-Opitz. 2017. “Facilitating the Social Participation of Pupils with Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Schools: A Review of School-Based Interventions.” Educational Research Review 20: 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gest, S. 2006. “Teacher Reports of Children’s Friendships and Social Groups: Agreement with Peer Reports and Implications for Studying Peer Similarity.” Social Development 15 (2): 248–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gest, S., R. Madill, K. Zadzora, A. Miller, and P. Rodkin. 2014. “Teacher Management of Elementary Classroom Social Dynamics: Associations with Changes in Student Adjustment.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 22 (2): 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, J., T. Farmer, K. Dadisman, M. Gravelle, and A. Murray. 2011. “Teachers’ Attunement to Students’ Peer Group Affiliations as a Source of Improved Student Experiences of the School Social–Affective Context Following the Middle School Transition.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 32 (5): 267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrabal, V. 2009. KK-1. Der Klassenkompass. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hymel, S., E. Wagner, and L. Butler. 1990. “Reputational Bias: View from the Peer Group.” In Peer Rejection in Childhood, edited by S. R. Asher, and J. D. Coie, 156–186. University Press: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Juvonen, J., L. Lessard, R. Rastogi, H. Schacter, and D. Smith. 2019. “Promoting Social Inclusion in Educational Settings: Challenges and Opportunities.” Educational Psychologist 54 (4): 250–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karremans, J., and C. Finkenauer. 2015. “Attraction and Close Relationships.” In Social Psychology, edited by M. Hewstone, W. Stroebe, and K. Jonas, 347–378. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Köb, S., and F. Janz. 2020. “Die soziale Position von Jugendlichen mit und ohne kognitive Beeinträchtigung in inklusiven Schulklassen - subjektive Theorien von Lehrkräften und Begründungen von Peers.” Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete 89: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kocaj, A., P. Kuhl, A. Kroth, H. Pant, and P. Stanat. 2014. “Wo lernen Kinder mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf besser? Ein Vergleich schulischer Kompetenzen zwischen Regel- und Förderschulen in der Primarstufe.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 66 (2): 165–191.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, D., M. Le Pouesard, and J. Rummens. 2018. “Defining Social Inclusion for Children with Disabilities: A Critical Literature Review.” Children & Society 32 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, M., M. Timmerman, H. Nakken, S. Pijl, and E. van Houten. 2009. “Evaluating Social Participation of Pupils with Special Needs in Regular Primary Schools: Examination of a Teacher Questionnaire.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 25 (4): 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krull, J., J. Wilbert, and T. Hennemann. 2018. “Does Social Exclusion by Classmates Lead to Behaviour Problems and Learning Difficulties or Vice Versa? A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 33 (2): 235–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulawiak, P., and J. Wilbert. 2015. “Methoden zur Analyse der sozialen Integration von Schulkindern mit sonderpädagogischem Förderbedarf im gemeinsamen Unterricht.” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 7 (3): 241–257.
   Google Scholar
• Laßmann, S., S. Köb, F. Janz, S. Trumpa, and V. Heyl. 2019. “Einstellungen von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit kognitiven Beeinträchtigungen zu Inklusion – Übersetzung eines Fragebogens in Leichte Sprache.” Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik 9: 430–442.
   Google Scholar
• Mamas, C., G. Schaelli, A. Daly, H. Navarro, and L. Trisokka. 2019. “Employing Social Network Analysis to Examine the Social Participation of Students Identified as Having Special Educational Needs and Disabilities.” International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1–16. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2019.1614153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandl, H., and G. Huber. 1983. “Theoretische Grundpositionen zum Verhältnis von Emotion und Kognition.” Emotion und Kognition. München, 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2015. “Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Background and Procedures.” In Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education, edited by A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, and N. Presmeg, 365–380. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P., and T. Fenzl. 2019. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” In Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, edited by N. Baur and J. Blasius, 633–648. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Newcomb, A., W. Bukowski, and L. Pattee. 1993. “Children's Peer Relations: A Meta-Analytic Review of Popular, Rejected, Neglected, Controversial, and Average Sociometric Status.” Psychological Bulletin 113 (1): 99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwalk, K., J. Hamm, T. Farmer, and K. Barnes. 2016. “Improving the School Context of Early Adolescence Through Teacher Attunement to Victimization: Effects on School Belonging.” The Journal of Early Adolescence 36 (7): 989–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki, E., J. Brown, and L. Dare. 2018. “Educators’ Evaluation of Children’s Ideas on the Social Exclusion of Classmates with Intellectual and Learning Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 31: e154–e163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearl, R., M. Leung, R. Van Acker, T. Farmer, and P. Rodkin. 2007. “Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Teachers’ Awareness of Their Classrooms’ Social Networks.” The Elementary School Journal 108 (1): 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przibilla, B., F. Linderkamp, and P. Krämer. 2018. “Subjektive Definitionen von Lehrkräften zu Inklusion – eine explorative Studie.” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 3: 232–247.
   Google Scholar
• Ruberg, C., and R. Porsch. 2017. “Einstellungen von Lehramtsstudierenden und Lehrkräften zur schulischen Inklusion. Ein systematisches Review deutschsprachiger Forschungsarbeiten.” Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 63 (4): 394–415.
   Google Scholar
• Sarimski, K. 2019. Psychosoziale Entwicklung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Behinderung. Prävention, Intervention und Inklusion. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Scharenberg, K., and S. Röhl. 2018. “Klassenkomposition und soziale Integration in inklusiven Schulklassen.” In Leistung und Wohlbefinden in der Schule: Herausforderung Inklusion, edited by K. Rathmann and K. Hurrelmann, 300–316. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, K., W. Rauer, and D. Prinz. 2018. EiBiSch–Evaluation inklusiver Bildung in Hamburgs Schulen. Quantitative und qualitative Ergebnisse. New York: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, S. 2015. “Social Dimensions of Inclusion in Education of 4th and 7th Grade Pupils in Inclusive and Regular Classes: Outcomes from Austria.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 43-44: 72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifried, S., and V. Heyl. 2016. “Konstruktion und Validierung Eines Einstellungsfragebogens zu Inklusion für Lehrkräfte (EFI-L)“.” Empirische Sonderpädagogik 1: 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., and E. Thelen. 2003. “Development as a Dynamic System.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (8): 343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassé, M. J., R. Luckasson, and R. L. Schalock. 2016. “The Relation Between Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior in the Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 54 (6): 381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terfloth, K. 2017. “Inklusive Didaktik. Zwischen Individualisierung und Kooperation.” In Inklusive Schulen Entwickeln - Impulse für die Praxis, edited by T. Bernasconi, and U. Böing, 47–62. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Tobia, V., P. Riva, and C. Caprin. 2017. “Who Are the Children Most Vulnerable to Social Exclusion? The Moderating Role of Self-Esteem, Popularity, and Nonverbal Intelligence on Cognitive Performance Following Social Exclusion.” Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 45: 789–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Committee on the Rights with Disabilities. 2016. General Comment No 4: Article 24 the Right to Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, Y., and S. Stoltz. 2018. “Enhancing Social Inclusion of Children with Externalizing Problems through Classroom Seating Arrangements: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 26 (1): 31–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, M., and L. S. Walker. 2016. “The Theories of Status Characteristics and Expectation States.” In Handbook of Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by S. Abrutyn, 321–342. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar