Influence of leadership styles on teacher communication networks: a Hong Kong case study

References

• Alba-Juez, L. (2009). Perspectives on discourse analysis: Theory and practice. Newcastle upon Tyne:: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. & Clarke, D. (2012, December). The use of video technology to enhance researcher capacity to meet scientific and moral criteria for evaluation of discursive psychological studies in education. Australian Association of Research in Education International Conference, Sydney, 2–6 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Benham, M., & Murakami-Ramalho, E. (2010). Engaging in educational leadership: The generosity of spirit. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. K., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Editorial: Teacher collaboration in learning communities. Teaching Education, 17, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council (2001). Learning to learn: Life-long learning and whole-person development. Hong Kong: Printing Department Hong Kong Government.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C. (2000). Beyond transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 57, 56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results for a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J., Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. (1992). Discourse analysis. In M. LeCompte, W. Millney & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 227–291). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management and Administration, 28, 317–338.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, K. Seashore-Louis, G. Furman-Brown, P. Gronn, W. Mulford, & K. Riley (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 653–696). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., & Campbell, A. (2010). Joining the dots: Connecting inquiry and professional learning. In A. Campbell, & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education: International perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 200–206). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management, 23, 313–324.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. G. & Hawthorne, R. D. (1995). Transformative curriculum leadership. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2007). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., & Devos, G. (2009). How distributed leadership can make a difference in teachers’ organizational commitment? A qualitative study. Teachers and Teacher Education, 26, 565–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., & Wiseman, D. (2005). Lessons learned from a research synthesis on the effects of teachers’ professional development on culturally diverse students. In H. Waxman, & K. Tellez (Eds.), Improving teacher quality for English language learners (pp. 71–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2009). Are we looking through the same lens? Principal recruitment and selection. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. H. F. (2010). Space for teacher learning: A case study on developing teacher curriculum leadership in Hong Kong. In K. Yamazumi (Ed.), Activity theory and fostering learning (pp. 87–110). Osaka: Center for Human Activity Theory.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. H. F. (2011). Exploring the role of leadership in facilitating teacher learning in Hong Kong. School Leadership & Management, 31, 391–407.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. H. F., Galton, M., & Wan, S. W. Y. (2010). Distributed curriculum leadership in action: A Hong Kong case study. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 38, 286–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, E. H. F., & Wan, S. W. Y. (2006). Developing curriculum leadership in a primary school: A Hong Kong case study. Curriculum and Teaching, 21, 61–90.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. H. F., Wan, S. W. Y., Galton, M., & Lee, J. C. K. (2010). Managing school based curriculum innovations: A Hong Kong case study. The Curriculum Journal, 21, 313–332.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C. K., Dimmock, C., & Au Yeung, T. Y. (2009). Who really leads and manages the curriculum in primary schools? A Hong Kong case study. The Curriculum Journal (Official journal of British Curriculum Association), 20, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, J. (1982). A perspective on education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J. (2005). Leadership as distributed: A matter of practice. School Leadership & Management, 25, 349–366.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., & Moos, L. (2004). Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, R., Fox, A., Carmichael, P., & Procter, R. (2011). Researching and understanding educational networks. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 961–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvanova, R. K., & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shouse, R. C., & Lin, K. P. (2010). Principal leadership in Taiwan schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L. (2009). Connecting learning communities: Capacity building for systemic change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 469–484). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas Stoll L. Louis K. S. Open University Press London 2007
   Google Scholar
• Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research Tashakkori A. Teddlie C. Sage Thousand Oaks CA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. L., Edstam, T., & Stone, K. (2007). Two years, three kinds of educators, and four schools: Improving education for English language learners. Chicago, IL: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar