Horizontal dynamics in an inter-professional school improvement team

References

• Aas, M. (2009). Diskusjonens kraft. En longitudinell studie av et skoleutviklingsprosjekt der leseeksperter/forskere støtter rektorer og lærere ved sju skoler i utvikling av skolens leseundervisning [The power in discussions. A longitudinal study of a school development there reading experts/scientists supporting principals and teachers at seven schools in the development of the school’s reading instruction] (doctoral dissertation). Department of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D. (2007). Bridging the university–school divide horizontal expertise and the ‘two-worlds pitfall’. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 138–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., Hay, S., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2001). Constructing networks of action-relevant episodes: An in-situ research methodology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 63–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T. (2009). Leadership development and school improvement: Contemporary issues in leadership development. Educational Review, 61, 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, G., Lumby, J., & Pashiardis, P. (2008). Introduction: Why an international handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders. In G. Crow, J. Lumby, & P. Pashiardis (Eds.), International handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner: The relational turn in expertise (Vol. 3). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Retrieved October 14, 2008 from doi: http://lchc.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/intro.htm
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in teams. Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2006). From well-bounded ethnographies to intervening in mycorrhizae activities. Organization Studies, 27, 1783–1793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2007). Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward coconfiguration. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14, 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2008). Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interacting with Computers, 20, 256–259. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2007). From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: The contribution of activity theory. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19, 336–342.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K. A. (2002). Pursuing an evolving object: A case study in object formation and identification. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. London: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 286–303. doi:10.1080/10749039909524733.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Heat, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2002). Analyzing interaction: Video, ethnography and situated conduct. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice (pp. 99–121). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G. (2004). School leadership and leadership development: Adjusting leadership theories and development programs to values and the core purpose of school. Journal of Educational Administration, 42, 669–684.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G. (2011). Leadership for learning—learning for leadership: The impact of professional development. In T. Townsend, & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 831–853). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S. (2005). Objects and motives in a product design process. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jahreie, C. F., & Ottesen, E. (2010). Construction of boundaries in teacher education: Analyzing student teachers’ accounts. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 212–234. doi:10.1080/10749030903314195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R., & Møller, R. (2013). School data as mediators in professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 14(1), 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Miettinen, R. (2005). Introduction: Perspectives on the object of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15, 345–351.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2006). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2010). Changing objects in knowledge creation practices. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & S. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 206–211). London: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Designs for teaching and learning in technology rich learning environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 6, 258–272.
   Google Scholar
• MacBeath, J., & Townsend, T. (2011). Leadership and learning: Paradox, paradigms and principles. In J. MacBeath, & T. Townsend (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 16–50). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (1996). Rethinking educational leadership. EERA Bulletin, 2, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (1998). Action research with principals: Gain, strain and dilemmas. Educational Action Research, 6, 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Ottesen, E. (2011). Building leadership capacity: The Norwegian approach. In T. Townsend, & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 619–635). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Portin, B. S. (2009). Cross-national professional learning for school leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 239–252. doi:10.1080/13603120802688119.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161x08321509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1289–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 1–19). Bingley: Emarald.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. D., Crow, G. M., Murphey, J., & Ogawa, R. T. (2009). Introduction. Exploring the broad terrain of leadership preparation in education. In M. D. Young, G. M. Crow, J. Murphey, & R. T. Ogawa (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar