The directive communication of Australian primary school principals

References

• Adams, E. (2001). A proposed causal model of vocational teacher stress. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 53, 223–246.10.1080/13636820100200153
   Google Scholar
• Arlestig, H. (2007). Principals’ communication inside schools: A contribution to school improvement? The Educational Forum, 71, 262–273.10.1080/00131720709335010
   Google Scholar
• Arlestig, H. (2008). Structural prerequisites for principals’ and teachers’ communication about teaching and learning issues. Improving Schools, 11, 189–203.10.1177/1365480208097000
   Google Scholar
• Bredeson, P. V. (1987). Principally speaking: An analysis of the interpersonal communications of school principals. The Journal of Educational Administration, 25, 55–71.10.1108/eb009925
   Google Scholar
• Canales, M. T., Tejeda-Delgado, C., & Slate, J. R. (2008). Leadership behaviours of superintendent/principals in small school districts in Texas. The Rural Educator, 29 (3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Collard, J. (1990). The communication of principals. In J. McMahon, H. Neidhart, J. Chapman, & L. Angus (Eds.), Leadership in catholic education (pp. 166–182). Richmond, VIC: Spectrum Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1189–1204.10.1037/a0029356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2011). Teacher learning, instructional considerations and principal communication: Lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 39, 568–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Nobile, J. (2005). Managerial communication in primary schools. The Australian Educational Leader, 27, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• De Nobile, J. (2007, August). A ten-dimension model of communication in schools. Perspectives on Educational Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• De Nobile, J. J., & McCormick, J. (2008). Organizational communication and job satisfaction in Australian catholic primary schools. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36, 101–122.
   Google Scholar
• De Nobile, J., McCormick, J., & Hoekman, K. (2013). Organizational communication and occupational stress in Australian catholic primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 744–767.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2008). How to get your school moving and improving. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Djibo, I. J. A., Desiderio, K. P., & Price, N. M. (2010). Examining the role of perceived leader behaviour on temporary employees’ organizational commitment and citizenship behaviour. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21, 321–342.10.1002/hrdq.v21.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duignan, P. (2012). Educational leadership: Together creating ethical learning environments (2e). Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139197045
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, J. (2009). The business communication handbook (8e). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, D. (2001). Who controls the teachers? Overt and covert control in schools. Educational Management and Administration, 29, 97–111.10.1177/0263211X010291007
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, S. (2012). Communication of expectations between principals and entry-year instrumental music teachers: Implications for music teacher assessment. Arts Education Policy Review, 113, 136–146.10.1080/10632913.2012.719426
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (2001). Delving deeper into morale, job satisfaction and motivation among education professionals: Re-examining the leadership dimension. Educational Management & Administration, 29, 291–306.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchigami, K. (1993). A study of organizational communication in a school during the pre- and post-innovation periods. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 64, 35–42.10.4992/jjpsy.64.35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldhaber, G. M. (1993). Organizational communication (6th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. C. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (1), 1–21.10.2307/2392382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2010). Leadership: Its genealogy, configuration and trajectory. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42, 405–435.10.1080/00220620.2010.492959
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2007). Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10, 315–325.10.1080/13603120701257313
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323–352.10.1016/S1048-9843(96)90024-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A., & Miller, B. A. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461–477). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, J., & Barnett, K. (2011). Teachers’ attributions for stress and their relationships with burnout. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 278–293.10.1108/09513541111120114
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, E. W., Patrick, S. L., & King, W. C. (1996). Job level as a systemic variable in predicting the relationship between supervisory communication and job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 277–292.10.1111/joop.1996.69.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murley, L. D., Keedy, J. L., & Welsh, J. F. (2008). Examining school improvement through the lens of principal and teacher flow of influence in high-achieving, high-poverty schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7, 380–400.10.1080/15700760701746612
   Google Scholar
• Owens, R. G., & Valseky, T. C. (2011). Organizational behaviour in education: Leadership and school reform (10e). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rakes, T. A., & Cox, G. C. (1994). Persuasive strategies for school administrators: A key to school effectiveness. NASSP Bulletin, 78, 97–102.10.1177/019263659407856419
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., Petocz, P., & Gordon, S. (2008). Research interviews in cyberspace. Qualitative Research Journal, 8, 47–61.10.3316/QRJ0801047
   Google Scholar
• Retallick, J., & Fink, D. (2002). Framing leadership: Contributions and impediments to educational change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5, 91–104.10.1080/13603120110112864
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. B., Perse, E. M., & Barbato, C. A. (1988). Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14, 602–628.10.1111/hcre.1988.14.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. G., & Mitchell, T. R. (1976). Organizational theory: A structural and behavioural approach. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Shalem, Y., & Hoadley, U. (2009). The dual economy of schooling and teacher morale in South Africa. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 19, 119–134.10.1080/09620210903257224
   Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Wenderow, M. (2010). The impact of participative and directive leadership on teachers’ performance: The intervening effects of job structuring, decision domain, and leader-member exchange. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 746–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starratt, R. J. (1990). The dramatic consciousness of the principal. In J. McMahon, H. Neidhart, J. Chapman, & L. Angus (Eds.), Leadership in catholic education (pp. 40–59). Richmond, VIC: Spectrum Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stockman, T. R. (1990). Why Summerhill? The significance of organizational identity to an educational institution. Scottish Educational Review, 22, 108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56.10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, L. (1968). Communication and communication systems in organization, management, and interpersonal relations. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, N. L., McLeskey, J., & Redd, L. (2011). Setting the direction: The role of the principal in developing an effective, inclusive school. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 24, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. (2001). Sharing leadership of schools through teamwork. Educational Management and Administration, 29, 153–167.10.1177/0263211X010292002
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 79, 505–516.10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. (2002). Student participation and school culture: A secondary school case study. Australian Journal of Education, 46, 79–102.10.1177/000494410204600107
   Google Scholar
• Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (2009). Instructional leadership: A research-based guide to learning in schools (3e). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. J. (2000). Teacher morale in Western Australia: A multilevel model. Learning Environments Research, 3, 159–177.10.1023/A:1026574424714
   Google Scholar