977
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

Creating and maintaining student diversity: strategies and challenges for school leaders

References

  • Adams, M. (2004). Shifting sands: The jurisprudence of integration past, present, and future. 47 How.L.J. 795, p. 824.
  • Anderson, A. L. (2005). The charter school initiative as a case of back to the future. Educational Foundations, 19, 33–50.
  • Andre’-Bechely, L. (2005). Public school choice at the intersection of voluntary integration and not-so-good neighbourhood schools: Lessons from parents’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 267–305.10.1177/0013161X04269593
  • Anyon, J. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162, 67–92.
  • Ascher, C., & Wamba, N. (2005). An examination of charter school equity. In J. T. Scott (Ed.), School choice and diversity (pp. 77–92). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Ball, S. J., & Vincent, C. (1998). ‘I heard it on the grapevine’: ‘Hot’ knowledge and school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19, 377–400.10.1080/0142569980190307
  • Bancroft, K. (2009). To have and to have not: The socioeconomic of charter schools. Education and Urban Society, 41, 248–279.
  • Bell, C. A. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 191–208.10.1080/01619560902810146
  • Bifulco, R., & Ladd, H. F. (2006). School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina’s charter school program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 31–56.
  • Bodine, E., Fuller, B., González, M., Huerta, L., Naughton, S., Park, S., & Teh, L. (2008). Disparities in charter school resources – The influence of state policy and community. Journal of Education Policy, 23(1), 1–33.10.1080/02680930701625262
  • Bowman, D. H. (2000). Charters, vouchers earning mixed report cards. Education Week, 19(34), 1, 19–21.
  • Braddock, II, J. H., & Eitle, T. M. (2004). The effects of school desegregation. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research of multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 828–846). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Braddock II, J. H., & Gonzalez, A. D. C. (2010). Social isolation and social cohesion: The effects of K-12 neighborhood and school segregation on intergroup orientations. Teachers College Record, 112, 4–5.
  • Buckley, J., & Schneider, M. (2007). Charter schools: Hope or hype? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Bulkley, K., & Fisler, J. (2002). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  • Chaplin, D. (2002). Estimating the impact of economic integration of schools on racial integration. In the century foundation task force on the common school. Divided we fail: Coming together through public school choice (pp. 87–113). New York, NY: The Century Foundation Press.
  • Charter School Performance in New York City (CREDO). (2013). Retrieved from http://credo.stanford.edu/documents/NYC_report_2013_FINAL_20130219_000.pdf
  • Crew, R. E. Jr., & Anderson, M. R. (2003). Accountability and performance in charter schools in Florida: A theory-based evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 189–212.10.1177/109821400302400204
  • Diamond, J. B., & Gomez, K. (2004). African American parents’ educational orientations: The importance of social class and parents’ perceptions of schools. Education and Urban Society, 36, 383–427.10.1177/0013124504266827
  • Delaney, P. (2008). What do parents Want? Factors affecting parental decisions in charter school enrollment. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05122008-144009/unrestricted/MastersThesis.pdf
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.10.2307/2095101
  • Eaton, S. (2001). The other Boston busing story: What’s won and lost across the boundary line. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Eckes, S., & Rapp, K. (2005). Charter schools: Trends and implications. In E. S. John (Ed.), Readings on education, 19 (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: AMS Press.
  • Eckes, S., & Trotter, A. E. (2007). Are charter schools using recruitment strategies to increase student body diversity? Education and Urban Society, 40, 62–90.10.1177/0013124507304012
  • Foster, M. (1997). Black Teachers on Teaching. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Frankenberg, E., & Lee, C. (2003). Charter school and race: A lost opportunity for integrated education. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
  • Frankenberg, E., Sigele-Hawley, G., & Wang, J. (2010). Choice without equity: Charter school segregation and the need for civil right standards. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA. Retrieved from www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
  • Fusarelli, L. D. (2002). Texas: Charter schools and the struggle for equity. In S. Vergari (Ed.), The charter schools landscape (pp. 192–207). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
  • Garcia, D. R. (2008). The impact of school choice on racial segregation in charter schools. Educational Policy, 22, 805–829.
  • Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gewirtz, Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice, and equity in education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Goldsmith, P. R. (2010). Learning apart, living apart: How the racial and ethnic segregation of schools and colleges perpetuates residential segregation. Teachers College Record, 112, 3–4.
  • Goza, F., & Ryabov, I. (2009). Adolescents’ educational outcomes: Racial and ethnic variations in peer network importance. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 38, 1264–1279.10.1007/s10964-009-9418-8
  • Grissmer, D. W., Kirby, S. N., Berends, M., & Williamson, S. (1994). Student achievement and the changing American family. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
  • Gutierrez, K. J., & Rossow, L. (2009). The US supreme court speaks on voluntary school integration plans: Policy and practice implications for educational leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 93, 53–72.10.1177/0192636509336437
  • Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivkin, S. G. (2005). New evidence about Brown v. Board of Education: The complex effects of school racial composition of achievement (Discussion Paper No. 1284-04). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.
  • Holyoke, T. T. (2008). Dimensions of charter school choice. Journal of School Choice, 2, 302–317.10.1080/15582150802371515
  • Hoxby, C. M. (2002). How school choice affects the achievement of public school students. In P. Hill (Ed.), Choice with equity (pp. 141–172). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.
  • Hoxby, C. M., Murarka, S., & Kang, J. (2009, September). How New York City’s charter schools affect achievement, August 2009 Report. Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project.
  • Kadushin, C. (2004). Basic network concepts. Introduction to Social Network Theory. Retrieved from http://stat.gamma.rug.nl/snijders/Kadushin_Concepts.pdf
  • Kahlenberg, R. (2001). All together now: Creating middle-class schools through public school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Lake, R., Gross, B., & Denice, P. (2013, April). New York state special education enrollment analysis (Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, November 2012); Students with special learning needs and NYC charter schools, 2012–2013, New York: New York City Charter School Center.
  • Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York, NY: The Falmer Press.
  • Lareau, A. (2007). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in Black families and White families. In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Sociology of education: A critical reader (pp. 325–354). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815447
  • Lopez, A., Wells, A. S., & Holme, J. J. (2002). Creating charter school communities: Identifying building diversity, and selectivity. In A. S. Wells (Ed.), Where charter school policy fails: The problems of accountability and equity (pp. 129–158). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Lubienski, C. (2005). Public schools in marketized environments: Shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition‐based educational reforms. American Journal of Education, 111, 464–486.10.1086/aje.2005.111.issue-4
  • Lubienski, C. (2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40, 118–141.10.1177/0013124507303994
  • Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115, 601–647.10.1086/599777
  • Massey, D. S. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • McNeal, L. R. (2009). The re-segregation of public education now and after the end of brown v. board of education. Education and Urban Society, 41, 562–574.10.1177/0013124509333578
  • Mead, J. F., & Green, P. C. (2012). Chartering equity: Using charter school legislation and policy to advance equal educational opportunity. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved June 10, 2013, from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/chartering-equity
  • Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for American from a small school in Harlem. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mickelson, R. A. (2001). The effects of segregation on African American high school seniors’ academic achievement. Journal of Negro Education, 68, 566–586.
  • Miron, G., Nelson, C., & Risley, J. (2002). Strengthening Pennsylvania’s charter school reform: Findings from the statewide evaluation and discussion of relevant policy issues. Kalamazoo: The Evaluation Venter, Western Michigan University.
  • Ni, Y. (2007). Are charter schools more racially segregated than traditional public schools? (Policy Report No. 30). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Education Policy Center.
  • Orfield, G., & Eaton, S. E. (1997). The growth of segregation: African Americans, Latinos, and unequal education. Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York, NY: The New Press.
  • Orfield, G. (2009). Reviving the goal of an integrated society: A 21st century challenge. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechoes Civiles at UCLA.
  • Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M. (2008). Statement of American social scientists of research on school desegregation to the US supreme court in Parents v. Seattle school district and Meredith v. Jefferson county. The Urban Review, 40, 96–136.10.1007/s11256-007-0073-7
  • Orfield, G. & Lee, C. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating re-segregation, and the need for new integration strategies. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project at UCLA.
  • Peebles, L. (2000). Charter school equity issues: Focus on minority and at-risk students. Policy brief. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
  • Pitre, P. E. (2009). Parents involved in community schools v. Seattle school district no. 1: Policy implications in an era of change. Education and Urban Society, 41, 544–561.10.1177/0013124509333785
  • Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (2001). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Rapp, K. E., & Eckes, S. (2007). Dispelling the myth of “white flight”: An examination of minority enrollment in charter schools. Educational Policy, 21, 615–661.10.1177/0895904806290123
  • Reardon, S. F., Yun, J. T., & Kurlaender, M. (2006). Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 49–75.10.3102/01623737028001049
  • Renzulli, L. A. (2006). District segregation, race legislation, and black enrollment in charter schools. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 618–637.10.1111/ssqu.2006.87.issue-3
  • Rofes, E. E., & Stulberg, L. M. (2004). The emancipatory promise of charter schools: Towards a progressive politics of school choice. New York, NY: State of University of New York Press.
  • Saatcioglu, A. (2010). Disentangling school- and student level effects of desegregation and resegregation on the dropout problem in urban high schools: Evidence from the Cleveland Municipal School District, 1977–1998. Teachers College Record, 112, 1391–1442.
  • Saporito, S. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50, 181–203.
  • Saporito, S., & Sohoni, D. (2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79, 81–105.10.1177/003804070607900201
  • Schneider, J. (1999). Five prevailing charter types. American Association of School Administrators, 56, 29–31.
  • Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis., 24, 133–144.10.3102/01623737024002133
  • Scott, R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
  • Solomon, L. C. (2003). Findings from the 2002 survey of parents with children in Arizona charter school: How parents grade their chart schools. Santa Monica, CA: Human Resources Policy Corporation.
  • Stambach, A., & Becker, N. C. (2006). Finding the old in the new: On race and class in US charter school debates. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 9, 159–182.
  • Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Spina, S. U. (2000). The network orientation of highly resilient urban minority youth: A network-analytic account of minority socialization and its educational implications. The Urban Review, 32, 227–261.
  • Stearns, E. (2010). Long-term correlates of high school racial composition: Perpetuation theory reexamined. Teachers College Record, 112, 1654–1678.
  • Stillman, J. B. (2012). Gentrification and schools: The process of integration when Whites reverse flight. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Teske, F. J. & Kaplan, G. (2007). Opening doors: How low-income parents search for the right school. Seattle, WA: Center for Reinventing Public Education.
  • Teske, P., & Schneider, M. (2001). What research can tell policymakers about school choice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 609–631.
  • The Civil Rights Project. (2002). The impact of racial and ethnic diversity on educational outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The condition of Education 2014 (NCES 2014–083). Charter School Enrollment.
  • Weiher, G. R., & Tedin, K. L. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 79–92.
  • Wells, A. S. (1996). African-American students’ view of school choice. In B. Fuller, R. F. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses, who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 25–49). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Wells, A. S., & Crain, R. L. (1994). Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of Educational Research, 64, 531–555.
  • Wells, A. S., Holme, J. J., Atanda, A. K., & Revilla, A. T. (2005). Tackling racial segregation one policy at a time: Why school desegregation only went so far. Teachers College Record, 107, 2141–2177.
  • Welner, K. G., & Howe, K. R. (2005). Steering toward separation: The policy and legal implications of “counseling” special education students away from charter schools. In J. T. Scott (Ed.), School choice and diversity (pp. 93–111). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Witte, J. F. (1996). Who benefits from the Milwaukee choice program? In B. Fuller, R. F. Elmore, & G. Orfield (Eds.), Who chooses, who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 118–137). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Yednak, C., & Little, D. (2009, December 20). City schools’ new criteria for diversity raise fears. The New York Times, p. A4.
  • Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.