Mediating effects of school process on the relationship between principals’ data-informed decision-making and student achievement

References

• Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18, 34–64.10.1177/0013161X82018003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudett, K. P., City, E., & Murnane, R. (2005). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boykin, A. W., & Cunningham, R. T. (2001). The effects of movement expressiveness in story content and learning context on the analogical reasoning performance of African American children. Journal of Negro Education, 70, 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. O. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Celio, M. B., & Harvey, J. (2005). Buried treasure: Developing a management guide from mountains of school data. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, T. B. (2001). Data analysis and the principalship. Principal Leadership, 1, 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, T. B. (2006). Schools and data: The educator’s guide for using data to improve decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). Policy and professionalism. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in organizations (pp. 55–77). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, E. M., & Boykin, A. W. (2000). The comparative influence of individual, peer tutoring, and communal learning contexts on the text recall of African American children. Journal of Black Psychology, 26, 65–78.10.1177/0095798400026001004
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 467–476.10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Cravens, X., Murphy, J., Porter, A., Elliott, S., & Carson, B. (2009). The evaluation of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership? The Elementary School Journal, 110, 19–39.10.1086/605919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8, 1–36.10.1080/15700760802014951
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (1992). Changing norms of principal leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 30, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 271–306.10.1177/0013161X10383412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2012). A data-driven approach to assess and develop instructional leadership with the PIMRS. In J. Shen (Ed.), Tools for improving principals’ work (pp. 47–69). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5–44.10.1177/0013161X96032001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38, 654–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 14, 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 659–689.10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Moriyama, K. (2010). Examining relationships among elementary schools’ contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 377–408.10.1080/09243453.2010.500097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R., & Marcoulides, G. (1992). Principal assessment: Conceptual problem, methodological problem, or both? Peabody Journal of Education, 68, 124–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hersey, P. H., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2007). Management of Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modelling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Swinnerton, J. A., Copland, M. A., & Monpas-Huber, J. (2006). Data-informed leadership in education. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Learning, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995a). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491.10.3102/00028312032003465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1995b). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34, 159–165.10.1080/00405849509543675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Teaching in dangerous times: Culturally relevant approaches to teacher assessment. The Journal of Negro Education, 67, 255–267.10.2307/2668194
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V., & Smith, J. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104, 103–147.10.1086/444122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(Supp), 679–706.10.1177/0013161X99355002
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Anderson, S., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (2011). School leaders’ influences on student learning: The four paths. In T. Bush, L. Bell, & D. Middlewood (Eds.), The principles of educational leadership and management (pp. 13–30). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38, 112–129.10.1108/09578230010320064
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118, 143–166.10.1086/663271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. D. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757–798.10.3102/00028312033004757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., & Willms, J. D. (2004). School disciplinary climate: Characteristics and effects on eighth grade achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50, 169–188.
   Google Scholar
• Manthey, G. (2006). Collective efficacy: Explaining school achievement. Leadership, 35, 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, G. A., & Heck, R. H. (1993). Organizational culture and performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 4, 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H., Louis, K. S., & Printy, S. (2000). The capacity for organizational learning: Implications for pedagogy and student achievement. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Organizational learning and school improvement (pp. 239–266). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370–397.10.1177/0013161X03253412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (2006). Michigan educational assessment program technical report 2005–2006. Lansing: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (2011). Michigan statewide assessment selection guidelines. Lansing: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. E., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 297–321.10.3102/01623737023004297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, R. J., & White, G. P. (2005). Within the accountability era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89, 56–71.10.1177/019263650508964505
   Google Scholar
• Pounder, D. G. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 564–588.10.1177/0013161X9503100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 353–389). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B. P., Correnti, R. J., Miller, R. J., & Camburn, E. M. (2009). School improvement by design: Lessons from a study of comprehensive school reform programs. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. N. Plank (Eds.), Handbook on education policy research (pp. 637–650). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sebring, B., & Bryk, A. (2000). School leadership and the bottom line in Chicago. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 440–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirotnik, K. A. (1980). Psychometric implications of the unit-of-analysis problem (with examples from the measurement of organizational climate). Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 245–282.10.1111/jedm.1980.17.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Cooley, V. E., Ma, X., Reeves, P. L., Burt, W. L., Rainey, J. M., & Yuan, W. (2012). Data-informed decision making on high-impact strategies: Developing and validating an instrument for principals. Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Cooley, V., Reeves, P., Burt, W., Ryan, L., Rainey, J. M., & Yuan, W. (2010). Using data for decision-making: Perspectives from 16 principals in Michigan, USA. International Review of Education, 56, 435–456.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Ma, X. (2006). Does systemic change work? Curricular and instructional practice in the context of systemic change. Leadership and Policy in School, 5, 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., Ma, X., Cooley, V. E., & Burt, W. L. (under review). Measuring principals' data-informed decision-making on high-impact strategies: Validating an instrument used by teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W., Guarino, A., Strom, P., & Adams, O. (2006). Effective teaching and learning environments and principal self-efficacy. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 3, 4–23.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23–28.10.3102/0013189X030003023
   Google Scholar
• Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 703–729.10.1177/00131610021969173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, K. L., Louise, K. S., Leithwood, K., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Executive summary of research findings. Minneapolis: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Weldy, G. R. (1961). Teachers evaluate their principal. NASSP Bulletin, 45, 145–150.10.1177/019263656104526722
   Google Scholar
• Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 398–425.10.1177/0013161X03253411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74, 255–316.10.3102/00346543074003255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar