References
- Ärlestig, H. (2008). Communication between principals and teachers in successful schools. Umeå: Pedagogical institution, Umeå University.
- Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385–405.10.1177/146879410100100307
- Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in “teaching and teacher Education” over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
- Berg, B. L., Lune, H., & Lune, H. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.10.3102/0013189X033008003
- Chan, C. W. (2014). The leadership styles of Hong Kong kindergarten principals in a context of managerial change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42, 30–39.
- Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Dempster, N. (2012). Principals leading learning: Developing and applying a leadership framework. Education 3-13, 40, 49–62.
- Denton, C. A., & Hasbrouck, J. (2009). A description of instructional coaching and its relationship to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19, 150–175.10.1080/10474410802463296
- Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Devers, K., & Frankel, R. (2000). Study design in qualitative research-2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice (Taylor & Francis Ltd.), 13, 263–271.
- Education Bureau. (2002). Performance Indicators (Pre-primary Institutions) Domain on Management and Organisation. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/sch-admin/sch-quality-assurance/performance-indicators/performance-indicators-pre-primary-institutions/mo_kge2.pdf
- Education Bureau. (2006). Guide to the pre-primary curriculum. Retrieved April 7, 2015, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/major-level-of-edu/preprimary/pre-primaryguide-net_en.pdf
- Edwards, R., & Crow, G. (2013). What is qualitative interviewing?. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.10.1177/1077800405284363
- Gajda, R., & Koliba, C. (2007). Evaluating the imperative of intraorganizational collaboration a school improvement perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 26–44.10.1177/1098214006296198
- Garet, M., Porter, A. C, Desimone, L., Birman, B. F, & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.10.3102/00028312038004915
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Gumus, S., Bulut, O., & Bellibas, M. S. (2013). The relationship between principal leadership and teacher collaboration in Turkish primary schools: A multilevel analysis. Education Research and Perspectives, 40(1), 1–29.
- Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64, 405–424. doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.625111
- Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration. Netherlands: Springer.
- Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30, 95–110.10.1080/13632431003663214
- Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 659–689.10.3102/0002831209340042
- Ho, C. W. D. (2006). Understanding the complexity of preschool teaching in Hong Kong: The way forward to professionalism. International Journal of Educational Development, 26, 305–314.
- Ho, D. C. W. (2010). Teacher participation in curriculum and pedagogical decisions: Insights into curriculum leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38, 613–624.
- Ho, D. (2012). The paradox of power in leadership in early childhood education. Peabody Journal of Education, 87, 253–266.
- Ho, D., & Chen, S. C. S. (2013). Behind the starting line: school capacity building in early childhood education. School Leadership & Management, 33, 501–514.
- Ho, D., & Tikly, L. P. (2012). Conceptualizing teacher leadership in a Chinese, policy-driven context: A research agenda. School effectiveness and school improvement, 23, 401–416.
- Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Law, E. H. (2011). Exploring the role of leadership in facilitating teacher learning in Hong Kong. School Leadership & Management, 31, 393–410.
- Lee, W. (2008). ELP: Empowering the leadership in professional development communities. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 16, 95–106.10.1080/13502930801897087
- Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: Taking the ego out of the system. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 6, 37–67. doi:10.1080/15700760601091267
- Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
- Li, H. (2006). School-based curriculum development: An interview study of Chinese kindergartens. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33, 223–229.10.1007/s10643-006-0061-7
- Lichtman, M. (2010). Understanding and evaluating qualitative educational research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Linn, P. L., Howard, A., & Miller, E. (2004). Handbook for research in cooperative education and internships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum.
- Matsumura, L. C., Sartoris, M., Bickel, D. D., & Garnier, H. E. (2009). Leadership for literacy coaching: The principal's role in launching a new coaching program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 655–693.10.1177/0013161X09347341
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Ministry of Education (1996). Te Whäriki: He Whäriki Mataurangamonga Mokopunao Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
- Mitchell, J., Riley, P., & Loughran, J. (2010). Leading professional learning in schools: Emotion in action. Teacher Development, 14, 533–547.10.1080/13664530.2010.533495
- Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement/Joseph Murphy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Opper, S. (1992). Hong Kong’s young children: Their preschools and families. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
- Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81, 376–407.10.3102/0034654311413609
- Patti, J., Holzer, A. A., Stern, R., & Brackett, M. A. (2012). Personal, professional coaching: Transforming professional development for teacher and administrative leaders. Journal of Leadership Education, 11, 263–274.10.12806/V11/I1/AB4
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pearson, E., & Rao, N. (2006). Early childhood education policy reform in Hong Kong: Challenges in effecting change in practices. Childhood Education, 82, 363–368.10.1080/00094056.2006.10522863
- Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38, 169–188.10.1080/19415257.2012.657824
- Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 187–226.
- Rafferty, T. J. (2003). School climate and teacher attitudes toward upward communication in secondary schools. American Secondary Education, 31, 49–70.
- Rao, N., & Li, H. (2009). Quality matters: Early childhood education policy in Hong Kong. Early Child Development and Care, 179, 233–245.10.1080/03004430601078644
- Rieckhoff, B. S., & Larsen, C. (2012). The impact of a professional development network on leadership development and school improvement goals. School-University Partnerships, 5, 57–73.
- Robinson, V. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2007). The leadership of the improvement teaching and learning: Lessons from initiatives with positive outcomes for students. Australian Journal of Education, 51, 247–262.10.1177/000494410705100303
- Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of Leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.10.1177/0013161X08321509
- Salazar, P. S. (2007). The professional development needs of rural high school principals: A seven-state study. Rural Educator, 28, 20–27.
- Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning a study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 626–663.10.1177/0013161X11436273
- Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22, 63–75.
- Sheridan, S. M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C. A., & Knoche, L. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20, 377–401.10.1080/10409280802582795
- Slater, L. (2008). Pathways to building leadership capacity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36, 55–69.
- Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56.10.1177/1094670509353043
- United States Department of Education (2002). Executive summary: The no child left behind act of 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
- Vale, C., Davies, A., Weaven, M., Hooley, N., Davidson, K., & Loton, D. (2010). Leadership to improve mathematics outcomes in low SES schools and school networks. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 12, 47–71.
- Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458–495.10.1177/0013161X08321502
- Wan, E. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. The Teachers College Record, 107, 842–861.
- Wong, J. L. (2010). Searching for good practice in teaching: A comparison of two subject-based professional learning communities in a secondary school in Shanghai. Compare, 40, 623–639.
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 643–670.10.1177/0013161X02239642
- Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.10.1177/0022487109347671