Reinventing a university principal preparation programme: complexity, change, and leadership

References

• Adams, C. M., & Jean-Marie, G. (2011). A diffusion approach to study leadership reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 354–377.10.1108/09578231111146452
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. (1997). Learners in a telecommunications course: Adoption, diffusion, and stages of concern. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• April, K. A., McDonald, R., & Vriesendorp, S. (2000). Rethinking leadership. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. R. (2009). Innovation diffusion: Implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2009, 35–45.10.1002/ev.v2009:124
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam, Y. (2002). General features of complex systems. In encyclopedia of life support systems, volume 1—Knowledge management, organizational intelligence, and learning complexity. Oxford: UNESCO Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, K. (1998). Corporate DNA: Learning from life. New York, NY: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bhindi, N., Riley, D., Smith, R., & Hansen, J. (2008, April 30–May 3). Authentic leadership in education: A cross-country reality? Paper presented at the New Zealand Educational Administration and Leadership Society Conference (NZEALS), Auckland. Retrieved from www.nzeals.org.nz/leadinglights/Leading-lights24.4b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brisson-Banks, C. V. (2010). Managing change and transitions: A comparison of different models and their commonalities. Library Management, 31, 241–252.10.1108/01435121011046317
   Google Scholar
• Brownlee, P. P. (2000). Effecting transformational institutional change. National Academy Newsletter, 1(3). Retrieved January 13, 2014 from https://www.thenationalacademy.org/readings/effecting.html
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, C. B. (2012). From partnership formation to collaboration: Developing a state mandated university-multidistrict partnership to design a PK-12 principal preparation program in a rural service area. Planning and Change, 43, 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study developing successful principals. Stanford, CA: Educational Leadership Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Eacott, S. (2013). “Leadership” and the social: Time, space, and the epistemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 27, 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, P. D., & Keza, A. J. (2003). Taking the reins: Transformation in higher education. Traverse City, MI: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• El-Ghalayini, Y. (2017). Complexity theory: A new way to look at new public management. Network and Complex Systems, 7, 6–10. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/NCS/article/viewFile/34998/35999
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L. (2010). Pyblic decision-making as coevolution. Complexity theory for Public Administration and Policy, 12, 19–28.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581–629.10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groupthink. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/groupthink
   Google Scholar
• Harpe, B. D. L., & Thomas, I. (2009). Curriculum change in universities: Conditions that facilitate education for sustainable development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3, 75–85.10.1177/097340820900300115
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2002, June). A survival guide for leaders. Harvard Business Review, 80, 65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesbol, C. A. (2012). Learning to lead: An examination of innovative principal leadership preparation practices. Planning and Change, 43, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2002). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation programs? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved from https://www.ksg.harvard.edu/pepg/PDF/Papers/Hess_Kelly_Learning_to_Lead_PEPG05.02.pd
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 11–34.10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. B. (1999). The development of progressive and sustainable human complex adaptive systems: Institutions, organizations, and communities. Retrieved from https://www.unc.edu/~wfarrell/SOWO%20874/Readings/humancomplexsystems.htm
   Google Scholar
• Keup, J. R., Walker, A. A., Astin, H. S., & Lindholm, J. A. (2001). Organizational culture and institutional transformation. ERIC Digest ED464521. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kiel, L. D. (1994). Managing chaos and complexity in government. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D. B. & Stern, C. (2009). Groupthink in academia – Majoritarian departmental politics and the professional pyramid. The Independent Review, 13, 1086–1653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaridou, A. & Fris, J. (2008). Slipping the yoke of the heroic paradigm: Looking for quantum leadership. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 12, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education School Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, R., & Regine, B. (2000). The soul at work: Listen, respond, let go: Embracing complexity science for business success. New York, NY: Simon and Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. Lincoln: Management Department Faculty Publications. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/managementfacpub/63
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, B. B., Dooley, K., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 153–175.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2002). Leadership in complex organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 389–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence and groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, M. D. (1996). The intelligence advantage: Organizing for complexity. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. (1986). Research findings on the stages of school improvement. New York, NY: Center for Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2010). Complexity theory, school leadership and management: Questions for theory and practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38, 374–393.10.1177/1741143209359711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murat, M. G. (2015). Complexity theory and new leadership paradigm. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 10(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2001). Re-culturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Paper commissioned for the first meeting of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation, Racine, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Park, W. (1990). A review of research on Groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 229–245.10.1002/bdm.v3:4
   Google Scholar
• Park, W. (2000). A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 873–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, B. (2008). The ethnographic case study approach. In Global impact study: Final report and findings. Seattle, WA: Technology & Social Change Group, University of Washington Information School. Retrieved from https://www.globalimpactstudy.org/2008/07/the-ethnographic-case-study-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Plsek, P. E., & Wilson, T. (2001, September). Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare. British Medical Journal, 323, 746–749.10.1136/bmj.323.7315.746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratkanis, A. R., & Turner, M. E. (1998). Twenty-five years of groupthink theory and research: Lessons from the evaluation of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. D. (2011). Diverse perspectives on the groupthink theory—A literary review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4, 37–57. Retrieved from www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/elj/.../Rose_V4I1_pp37-57.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. E. & Pratkanis, A. R. (1998). A social identity maintenance model of groupthink. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 210–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Lincoln: Digital Commons@University of Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• de Wolf, T., & Holvoet, T. (2004). Emergence versus self-organization: Different concepts but promising when combined. Retrieved From https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11494676_1#page-1
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar