Does instructional leadership mediate effects of student home resources on opportunity to learn and math reasoning skills? A cross-national comparison of 4^th grade students

References

• Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2005, November). Multivariate statistical modeling with survey data. In Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology (FCSM) research conference(pp. 14–16).
   Google Scholar
• Baird, K. (2011). Assessing why some students learn math in high school: How useful are student-level test results? Educational Policy, 25(5), 784–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabou, R. (1996). Heterogeneity, stratification, and growth: Macroeconomic implications of community structure and school finance. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 584–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendikson, L., Robinson, V., & Hattie, J. (2012). Principal instructional leadership and secondary school performance. SET: Research Information for Teachers, (2012(1), 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education(pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boykin, A., & Noguera, P. (2011). Creating the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the achievement gap. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie, K. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardichon, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Advancing educational equity for underserved youth: How new state accountability systems can support school inclusion and student success. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M. (2015). International Test Score Comparisons and Educational Policy. National Education Policy Center. A report retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574696.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., & Ivanova, A. (2015). Using TIMSS and PISA results to inform educational policy: A study of Russia and its neighbours. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 248–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Li, Y. (2010). Instructional coherence in Chinese mathematics classroom—A case study of lessons on fraction division. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 711–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy and practice at the district level. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1996). The right to learn and the advancement of teaching: Research, policy, and practice for democratic education. Educational Researcher, 25(6), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 17(5), 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrini-Mundy, J., Burrill, G., & Schmidt, W. H. (2007). Building teacher capacity for implementing curricular coherence: Mathematics teacher professional development tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 311–324.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, T. G, Urick, A, & Wilson, A S. (2018). Exploring the effect of supportive teacher evaluation experiences on us teachers’ job satisfaction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(59), 1-36.
   Google Scholar
• Foy, P. (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011 user guide for the fourth grade combined international database. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
   Google Scholar
• Giersch, J. (2016). Academic tracking, high-stakes tests, and preparing students for college: How inequality persists within schools. Advance online publication: doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816681526
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Sook Kim, E., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. In K. Leithwood, P. Hallinger, G. C. Furman, K. Riley, J. MacBeath, P. Gronn, & B. Mulford (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 9–40). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional Leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980‐1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., Markman, J. M., & Rivkin, S. G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Wöβmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510), C63–C76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cut-off criteria for it indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new altneratives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Møller, J., Jacobson, S. L., & Wong, K. C. (2008). Cross-national comparisons in the international successful school principalship project (ISSPP): The USA, Norway and China. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2012). Sample design in TIMSS and PIRLS. In M. O. Martin & I. V. S. Mullis (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS and PIRLS 2011(pp. 1–21). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (Vol. 10.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, A., Elliott, S., Kettler, R., & Yel, N. (2014). Assessing students’ opportunity to learn the intended curriculum using an online teacher log: Initial validity evidence. Educational Assessment, 19, 159–184.
   Google Scholar
• Lanahan, L., Scotchmer, M., & McLaughlin, M. (2004). Methodological critique of current NCES survey measures of instructional processes. American Institutes for Research. A report. Retrieved from https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/AERA2004NCESMeasures.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Loeb, S. (2000). School size in chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers' attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochmiller, C. R. (2016). Examining administrators’ instructional feedback to high school math and science teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 75–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., & Grissom, J. (2013). What do we know about the use of value-added measures for principal evaluation? A Carnegie Foundation report. Retrieved from http://www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/CKN_2013_07_Loeb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Long, D. A. (2013). Cross-national educational inequalities and opportunities to learn: Conflicting views of instructional time. Educational Policy, 28(3), 351–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106, 532–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, S. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., Cresswell, J., & Ainley, J. (2006). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement: The role of home and school factors. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(2), 105–128.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, L. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Mislevy, J., Smith, T., Peters, V., & Gerard, S. N. (2015). Measuring the monitoring progress K-12 STEM indicators: A road map. Washington, DC: SRI Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Day, J. A., & Smith, M. S. (1993). Systemic reform and educational opportunity. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy (pp. 250–313). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, G. B., Diakow, R., & Gearhart, M. (2013). Towards curricular coherence in integers and fractions: A study of the efficacy of a lesson sequence that uses the number line as the principal representational context. Zdm, 45(3), 343–364.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., & Maier, A. (2009). Opportunity to learn. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, D. Plank, & T. Ford (Eds.), Handbook on education policy research (pp. 541–559). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., Burroughs, N., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., Cogan, L., Houang, R., & McKnight, C. (2011). Content coverage differences across districts/states: A persisting challenge for US education policy. American Journal of Education, 117(3), 399–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W., & Houang, R. (2012). Curricular coherence and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 294–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight. (2012). Inequality for all: The challenge of unequal opportunity in American schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuelka, M. (2013). Excluding students with disabilities from the culture of achievement: The case of the TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 2, 216–230.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, J. L., Porter, A., & Blank, R. (1995). Describing the enacted curriculum: Development and dissemination of opportunity to learn indicators in science edu- cation. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED385430.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stols, G. (2013). An investigation into the opportunity to learn that is available to Grade 12 mathematics learners. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A. (2016). Examining us principal perception of multiple leadership styles used to practice shared instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 152–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2011). What influences principals’ perceptions of academic climate? A nationally representative study of the direct effects of perception on climate. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 322–348.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). The impact of principal perception on student academic climate and achievement in high school: How does it measure up. Journal of School Leadership, 24(2), 386–414.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). What are the different types of principals across the united states? a latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A., Ford, T., & Wilson, A. (2016, November). Feasibility of increasing access: how does instructional leadership influence opportunity to learn in u. MI:S. and Belgium? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration. Detroit.
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., Wilson, A S., Ford, T. G., Frick, W. C., & Wronowski, M. L. (2018). Testing a framework of math progress indicators for essa: How opportunity to learn and instructional leadership matter. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 396–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, C., Widjaja, W., Herbert, S., Bragg, L. A., & Loong, E. Y. K. (2017). Mapping variation in children’s mathematical reasoning: The case of ‘what else belongs?’. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 873–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2001). TIMSS primary and middle school data: Some technical concerns. Educational Researcher, 30(6), 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Urick, A. (2017). Examining equitable access in schools: The relationship between student capital and opportunity to learn. A paper presented at a roundtable session at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Antonio, TX, April 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Woolard, J. C. (2012). Prelude to the Common Core: Internationally benchmarking a state’s math standards. Educational Policy, 27(4), 615–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2017a, July 19). Education statistics (edstats), equality. Retrieved from http://datatopics.worldbank.org/education/wDashboard/dqequality.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2017b, July 19). Education statistics (edstats), expenditures. Retrieved from http://datatopics.worldbank.org/education/wDashboard/dqexpenditures.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (2017c, July 19). Education statistics (edstats), policy data, school autonomy and accountability. Retrieved from http://datatopics.worldbank.org/education/wDashboard/dqpolicysaa.
   Google Scholar