700
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Relationships in distributed leadership, inquiry-based working, and realizing educational change in Dutch primary education: teachers’ and their school leader’s perceptions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aldaihani, G. (2019). Distributed leadership applications in high schools in the State of Kuwait from teachers’ viewpoints. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1562096
  • Amels, J., Krüger, M.L., Suhre, C.J.M., & Van Veen, K. (2019). Impact of inquiry-based working on the capacity to change in primary education. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 351−374.
  • Amels, J., Krüger, M.L., Suhre, C.J.M., & Van Veen, K. (2020). The effects of distributed leadership and inquiry-based work on primary teachers' capacity to change: Testing a model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. doi:10.1080/09243453.2020.1746363
  • Bellei, C., Vanni, X., Valenzuela, J. P., & Contreras, D. (2016). School improvement trajectories: An empirical typology. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1083038
  • Binkhorst, F., Poortman, C. L., McKenney, S. E., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (2018). Revealing the balancing act of vertical and shared leadership in teacher design teams. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.02.006
  • Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003). Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 73(2), 125–230. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543073002125
  • Brown, C., Schildkamp, K., & Hubers, M. D. (2017). Combining the best of two worlds: A conceptual proposal for evidence-informed school improvement. Educational Research, 59(2), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1304327
  • Buske, R. (2018). The principal as a key actor in promoting teachers’ innovativeness – Analyzing the innovativeness of teaching staff with variance-based partial least square modeling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1427606
  • Cranston, L. (2016). An open door to learning. Inquiry process builds collaborative cultures within and between schools. Oxford: Learning forward. The Professional Learning Association. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from www.learningforward.org
  • Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision-making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
  • Delegach, M., Kark, R., Katz-Navon, T., & Van Dijk, D. (2017). A focus on commitment: The roles of transformational and transactional leadership and self- regulatory focus in fostering organizational and safety commitment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 724–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1345884
  • DeMatthews, D. (2014). Principal and teacher collaboration: An exploration of distributed leadership in professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2(2), 176–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.447/ijelm.2014.16.
  • Deppeler, J., & Ainscow, M. (2016). Using inquiry-based approaches for equitable school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1026671
  • Earl, L., & Fullan, M. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122023
  • Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Corwin Press.
  • Fink, D. (2016). Trust and verify. The real keys to school improvement. UCL.
  • Geijsel, F., Van Den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. (1999). The innovative capacity of schools in primary education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/095183999236240
  • Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J. C., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109(4), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1086/593940
  • Greany, T. (2018). Innovation is possible, it’s just not easy: Improvement, innovation and legitimacy in England’s autonomous and accountable school system. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659297
  • Ham, S. H., Duyar, I., & Gumus, S. (2015). Agreement of self-other perceptions matters: Analyzing the effectiveness of principal leadership through multi-source assessment. Australian Journal of Education, 59(3), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115603373
  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
  • Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. Corwin Press.
  • Harris, A., Adams, D., Jones, M. S., & Muniandy, V. (2015). System effectiveness and improvement: The importance of theory and context. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.987980
  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
  • Ho, D., & Lee, M. (2016). Capacity building for school development: Current problems and future challenges. School Leadership & Management, 36(5), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1247040
  • Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840
  • Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the “Data-driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 105–131). Blackwell.
  • Johnson, C. W., & Voelkel, R. H. (2019). Developing increased leader capacity to support effective professional learning community teams. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1600039
  • Katz, S., & Dack, L. A. (2014). Towards a culture of inquiry for data use in schools: Breaking down professional learning barriers through intentional interruption. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.006
  • Klar, H. W., Huggins, K. S., Hammonds, H. L., & Buskey, F. C. (2016). Fostering the capacity for distributed leadership: A post-heroic approach to leading school improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(2), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1005028
  • Kocór, M., & Worek, B. (2017). Adult learning – Providing equal opportunities or widening differences? The polish case. British Journal of Educational Studies, 65(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1265642
  • Krüger, M. L. (2010). Leading schools in the knowledge society: On the way to leaders of learning in inquiry-based schools. In A. H. Normore (Ed.), Global perspectives on educational leadership reform: The development and preparation of leaders of learning and learners of leadership. Book series advances in educational administration (Vol. 11, pp. 397–417). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Krüger, M. L., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). The effect of school leadership on teachers’ inquiry habit of mind [Paper presented]. The 2011 annual meeting of the American educational research association, New Orleans
  • Lai, M. K., & Schildkamp, K. (2013). Data-based decision making: An overview. In K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, & L. Earl (Eds.), Data-based decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 9–21). Springer Netherlands.
  • Lauermann, F., & Karabenick, S. A. (2013). The meaning and measure of teachers’ sense of responsibility for educational outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.001
  • Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019003325
  • Little, J. W. (2012). Understanding data use practice among teachers: The contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1086/663271
  • Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systemic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459803
  • Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2020). Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842
  • Marsh, J. A., & Farrell, C. C. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making. A framework for understanding capacity building. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214537229
  • Moin, M. F. (2018). The link between perceptions of leader emotion regulation and followers’ organizational commitment. Journal of Management Development, 37(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2017-0014
  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Sage.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] (2012). School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to student performance? OECD Publishing. Retrieved April 5, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/48910490.pdf
  • Pineda-Báez, C., Bauman, C., & Andrews, D. (2019). Empowering teacher leadership: A cross-country study. International Journal of Leadership in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1543804
  • Ross, L., Lutfi, G. A., & Hope, W. C. (2016). Distributed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment. NASSP Bulletin, 100(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636516681842
  • Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). Jossey Bass.
  • Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
  • Schildkamp, K., Ehren, M., & Lai, M. K. (2012). Editorial article for the special issue on data-based decision making around the world: From policy to practice to results. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.652122
  • Sleegers, P., & Leithwood, K. (2010). School development for teacher learning and change. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed ed., pp. 557–561). Elsevier Scientific Publishers.
  • Spillane, J. P. (2012a). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  • Spillane, J. P. (2012b). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/663283
  • Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., & Pareja, A. M. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760601091200
  • Spillane, J. P., & Healey, K. (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective. Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/656300
  • Stoll, L. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change., 10(2/3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3
  • Stoll, L. (2013). Systemwide reform under pressure: A global perspective on learning and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311325712
  • Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. (2018). Principal–teacher interactions and teacher leadership development: Beginning teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1274785
  • Tam, A. C. F. (2019). Conceptualizing distributed leadership: Diverse voices of positional leaders in early childhood education. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1513156
  • Thoonen, E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. D. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678867
  • Thoonen, E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. D., & Geijsel., F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185
  • Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
  • Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Krüger, M., & Volman, M. (2019). Promoting inquiry-based working: Exploring the interplay between school boards, school leaders and teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739357
  • Uiterwijk-Luijk, L., Krüger, M., Zijlstra, B., & Volman, M. (2017). The relationship between psychological factors and inquiry-based working by primary school teachers. Educational Studies, 43(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1248901
  • Van Gasse, R., Vanlommel, K., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2017). The impact of collaboration on teachers’ individual data use. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1321555
  • Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J. P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a schoolwide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637346
  • Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A.J., & Fox, J-P. (2019). Changes in educational leadership during a data-based decision-making intervention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4), 628−647.
  • Woolfolk, A., Hughes, M., & Walkup, V. (2008). Psychology in education. Pearson Education Limited.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Design and methods. Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.