Coach supported teaming: enhancing functioning to improve outcomes for students with and without disabilities

References

• Abbott, M., & Wills, H. (2012). Improving the upside-down Response-to-Intervention triangle with a systematic, effective elementary school reading team. Preventing School Failure, 56(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2011.555793
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar, E. (2016). The art of coaching teams: Building resilient communities that transform schools. Josesy-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (2019, November 21). Justice served: Case closed for over 40 dogfighting victims. https://www.aspca.org/news/justice-served-case-closed-over-40-dogfighting-victims
   Google Scholar
• Bahr, M. W., Whitten, E., Dieker, L., Koccarek, C. E., & Manson, D. (1999). A comparison of school-based intervention teams: Implications for educational and legal reforms. Exceptional Children, 66(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299906600105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benishek, L., Gregory, M., Hodges, K., Newell, M., Hughes, A., Marlow, S., Lacerenza, C., Rosenfield, S., & Salas, E. (2016). Brining the science of team training to school-based teams. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendle, J. (2015). A survey of Response to Intervention team members’ effective practices in rural elementary schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34(2), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051503400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, J. J. (2013). From one to many: Best practices for team and group coaching. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, C., & Peters, J. (2013). The experience of team coaching: A dual case study. International Coaching and Psychology Review, 8(1), 80–98. http://inneractiveleadership.ca/content/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/carr-and-peters-re-team-coaching-in-icpr-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Center for Creative Leadership (n.d.). How feedback and talent conversations strengthen organizations. Center for Creative Leadership. https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/hr-pipeline-a-quick-win-to-improve-your-talent-development-process/
   Google Scholar
• Croft, A., Cogshell, J. G., Dolan, M., Powers, E., & Killion, J. (2010, April). Job-embedded professional development: What is it, who is responsible, and how to get it done well. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHCA) of 1975, RL. 94-142, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1975).
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177. (2015–2016).
   Google Scholar
• Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974 (20 U.S.C. § 1232g; 34 CFR Part 99). (1974).
   Google Scholar
• Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2017). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (8th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Glickman, C. D. (2014). Group development. In C. Glickman, S. Gordon, & J. Ross-Gordon (Eds.), Supervision and instructional leadership (pp. 258–280). Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, M. M., Anderson-Gare, B., Nelson, E. C., Nilsson, M., & Ahlstrom, G. (2014). Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: The coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(4), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, B. (2010). Team coaching: A literature review. IES Research Network, Institute for Employment Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement: Through staff development (3rd ed.). Association for Supervision and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, J., Harrison, C., Bryan, C., & Clifton, H. (2012). Coaching matters. Learning Forward.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. (2002). Schools as professional communities: Addressing the collaborative challenge. International Electronic Journal of Leadership in Learning, 6(17), 1–13. http://www.ucalgary.ca/iejll/volume6/leonard.html
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Pirola-Merlo, A., Yang, C., & Huang, C. (2009). Disseminating the functions of team coaching regarding research and development team effectiveness: Evidence from high-tech industries in Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, D. M., & Gallagher, P. A. (2010). Special education teachers’ attitudes and perceptions of teamwork. Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509338362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2015). Board on behavioral, cognitive, and sensory sciences, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. In Committee on the Science of Team Science, N. J. Cooke & M. L. Hilton (Eds.), Enhancing the effectiveness of team science pp. 59-80. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, W. P., Lane, K., Jenkins, A., & Booker, B. B. (2013). Three-tiered models of prevention: Teacher efficacy and burnout. Education & Treatment of Children, 36(4), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, J., & Carr, C. (2013). Team effectiveness and team coaching literature review. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 6(2), 116–136.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (1999). Protocols. Tools for Schools, 12(3), 1–7. https://learningforward.org/docs/tools-for-learning-schools/tools8-99.pdf?sfvrsn=2
   Google Scholar
• Rock, M. L., & Bateman, D. (2006). Using due process as an opportunity to improve educational practice. Intervention in School and Clinic, 45(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451209338392
   Google Scholar
• Rock, M. L., & Zigmond, N. (2001). Intervention assistance: Is it substance of symbolism? Preventing School Failure, 45(4), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880109603330
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfield, S., Newell, M., Zwolski, S., & Benshek, L. (2018). Evaluating problem-solving teams in K-12 schools: Do they work? American Psychologist, 73(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Hilt-Panahon, A., Gischlar, K. L., Semeniak, K., Leichman, E., & Bowles, S. (2012). An analysis of consistency between team decisions and reading assessment data within an RTI model. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510397763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Team Dynamics Assessment™. (n.d.). Dynamics Assessment™.http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/tda/
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heyden, A. M., Witt, J. C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the efficacy of a Response to Intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45(2), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workshop Exercises. (n.d.). Needs assessment. http://www.workshopexercises.com/needs_assessment.htm
   Google Scholar