Fictions from the underground

References

• Abercrombie, P. 1944. The Greater London Plan. Preliminary ed. London: H.M. Stationery Off.
   Google Scholar
• Ackroyd, P. 2012. London Under. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, J. C. 2004. Imagining London: Postcolonial Fiction and the Transnational Metropolis. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2009. J.G. Ballard's Surrealist Imagination: Spectacular Authorship. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont, M., and G. Dart, eds. 2010. Restless Cities. London, New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, R. 2006. “February 5. L.A.’S Future Is Up In The Air.” Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2006/feb/05/opinion/op-bradbury5
   Google Scholar
• Colombino, L. 2013. Spatial Politics in Contemporary London Literature: Writing Architecture and the Body. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D., and A. Warwick. 2013. “Unnoticed Apocalypse.” City 17 (4): 433–448. http://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.812345
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. 2003. “Simple Solutions to Complex Problems’: The Greater London Council and the Greater London Development Plan, 1965–1973.” In Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, J. 1999. Imagining The Modern City. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., and J. Charley. 2011. Writing the Modern City: Literature, Architecture, Modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evelyn, J. 1748. Londinum Redivivum [Print]. http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=3308502&partId=1&people=125726&peoA=125726–2–23&sortBy=&page=1
   Google Scholar
• Fine, D. M. 2004. Imagining Los Angeles: A City in Fiction. Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fritzsche, P. 1998. Reading Berlin 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gasiorek, A. 2005. J.G. Ballard. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, J. R. 2007. The Practice of Modernism: Modern Architects and Urban Transformation, 1954 1972. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Goss, A. 1961. “Moving Pavements.” Architect's Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Greater London Council. 1969. Tomorrow's London: A Background To The Greater London Development Plan. London: Greater London Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 1982. Great Planning Disasters. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2002. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, K., and D. Foushee. 2004. Nanoculture Implications Of The New Technoscience. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Huyssen, A. 2008. Other Cities, Other Worlds: Urban Imaginaries in a Globalizing Age. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jellicoe, G. 1961. Motopia: A Study in the Evolution of Urban Landscape. London: Studio.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2000. “Literary Geography: Joyce, Woolf and the City.” City 4 (2): 199–214. http://doi.org/10.1080/13604810050147820
   Google Scholar
• Kafka, F. 1989. The Complete Stories. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Larkham, P. J., and K. D. Lilley. 2001. Planning the City of Tomorrow: British Reconstruction Planning, 1939–1952; an Annotated Bibliography. North Yorkshire: Inch's Books Pickering.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or, The love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2011. The Production of Space. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lehan, R. 1998. The City in Literature: An intellectual and cultural history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• The London Underline. 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkw8BngECz0&feature=youtube_gdata_player
   Google Scholar
• Luckhurst, R. 2002. “The Contemporary London Gothic and the Limits of the ‘Spectral Turn.” Textual Practice 16 (3): 527–546. doi:10.1080/09502360210163336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckhurst, R. 2006. “Bruno Latour's Scientifiction: Networks, Assemblages, and Tangled Objects.” Science Fiction Studies 33 (1): 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, A. E. T. 1966. Underways. London: National Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Miéville, C. 1999. King Rat. London: Pan Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. 1999. Atlas of the European Novel, 1800–1900. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. 2011. “RE/Search, J.G. Ballard and New Brutalist Aftermath Aesthetics.” European Journal of American Culture 30 (2): 151–168. doi:10.1386/ejac.30.2.151_1
   Google Scholar
• Ogborn, M. 2005. “Mapping Words.” New Formations (57): 145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ortolano, G. 2011. “Planning the Urban Future in 1960s Britain.” The Historical Journal 54 (2): 477–507. doi:10.1017/S0018246X11000100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, F. 2015. “Bike Paths in Abandoned Tube Tunnels: Is the London Underline Serious?.” The Guardian, February 5. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/feb/05/bike-paths-abandoned-tube-tunnels-london-underline
   Google Scholar
• Plesske, N. 2014. The Intelligible Metropolis. London: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pudney, J. 1972. Crossing London's River: The Bridges, Ferries and Tunnels Crossing the Thames Tideway in London. London: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. 2007. “Visions of Urban Mobility: The Westway, London, England.” Cultural Geographies 14 (1): 74–91. doi:10.1177/1474474007072820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T. 2013. “Theorizing Maps with Literature.” Progress in Human Geography. doi:10.1177/0309132513510587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A. 2010. From Fantasy To Reality: How Science Fiction Has Influenced Technology. The Guardian, October 8. Accessed November 28, 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/lg-talking-technology/science-fiction-influence-on-technology
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, A. 2010. “Literary Geography: Reforging the Connections.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (4): 436–452. doi:10.1177/0309132509343612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharr, A., and S. Thornton. 2013. Demolishing Whitehall: Leslie Martin, Harold Wilson and the Architecture of White Heat. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, A. 2003. Moving Through Modernity: Space and Geography in Modernism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thacker, A. 2005. “The Idea of a Critical Literary Geography.” New Formations 57 (1): 56–73.
   Google Scholar
• Trench, R., and E. Hillman. 1993. London Under London: A Subterranean Guide. New ed. London: John Murray Publishers, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Truffaut, F. 1966. Fahrenheit 451.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B., and S. Arias, eds. 2009. “Sex and the Modern City: English Studies and the Spatial Turn.” In The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 102–121. Oxford; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, D. 2010. Underground Writing: The London Tube from George Gissing to Virginia Woolf. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. 2008. London in the Twentieth Century: A City and its People. London: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. J. 2004. The Anxious City: English Urbanism in the Late Twentieth Century. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolmar, C. 2012. The Subterranean Railway: How the London Underground was Built and how it Changed the City Forever. London: Atlantic Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar