Maintaining spatial and social order: the role of housing development in governing urban margins

References

• Andreotti, A., E. Mingione, and E. Polizzi. 2012. “Local Welfare Systems: A Challenge for Social Cohesion .” Urban Studies 49 (9): 1925–1940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghel, I.-M., and F. M. Alexandrescu. 2023. “‘We Lurk in the Hidden Places’: The (Un)Stable Spatialization of Roma Poverty in Romania .” Urban Studies 60 (10): 1875–1893. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221136984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaci, S. 2019. Paradoxes of Segregation. Housing Systems, Welfare Regimes and Ethnic Residential Change in Southern European Cities. Studies in Urban and Social Change. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., J. Evans, and B. Hennigan. 2020. “Investable Poverty: Social Investment States and the Geographies of Poverty Management .” Progress in Human Geography 44 (3): 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519849288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berescu, C. 2019. “How Many Ghettos Can We Count? Identifying Roma Neighbourhoods in Romanian Municipalities.” In Racialized Labour in Romania. Spaces of Marginality at the Periphery of Global Capitalism, edited by N. Petrovici, E. Vincze, and C. Raţ, 179–205. London: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Berescu, C., M. Petrovic, and N. Teller. 2013. “Housing Exclusion of the Roma Living on the Edge.” In Social Housing in Transition Countries, edited by József Hegedüs, Nóra Teller, and Martin Lux, 98–110. New York: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Berey, K. 1990. “A szociális követelményeknek meg nem felelő telepek felszámolása. Esély nélkül.” In szerk by K. Berey and Á Horváth, 5–72. Budapest: Esély nélkül Vita Kiadó .
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, G., D. Phillips, and R. Van Kempen. 2010. “Housing Policy, (De)segregation and Social Mixing: An International Perspective .” Housing Studies 25 (2): 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903564838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branyiczki, R., and A. Gábos. 2019. “Poverty Dynamics during the Economic Crisis in Hungary.” In Hungarian Social Report 2019, edited by I. Gy Tóth, 176–194. Budapest: Tárki .
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 2012. “: Reflections on Street-Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future .” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 2015. “The Inside Story: Street-Level Research in the U.S. and Beyond.” In Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy, edited by Michael Hill, Peter Hupe, and Aurèlien Buffat, 25–42. Bristol: Policy Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, C., A. Haase, K. Grossmann, and I. Ticha. 2014. “Governing Social Cohesion in Shrinking Cities: The Cases of Ostrava, Genoa and Leipzig .” European Planning Studies 22 (10): 2050–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.817540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czirfusz, M., V. Horváth, Cs Jelinek, Zs Pósfai, and L. Szabó. 2015. “Gentrification and Rescaling Urban Governance in Budapest-Józsefváros .” Intersections 1 (4): 55–77. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i4.104.
   Google Scholar
• Czirfusz, M., and Cs Jelinek. 2021. Lakhatási közpolitikák és a lakhatás megfizethetősége az elmúlt három évtizedben Éves jelentés a lakhatási szegénységről. Budapest: Habitat for Humanity .
   Google Scholar
• Elliott-Cooper, A., P. Hubbard, and L. Lees. 2020. “Moving Beyond Marcuse: Gentrification, Displacement and the Violence of Un-Homing .” Progress in Human Geography 44 (3): 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519830511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and G. DeVerteuil. 2018. “The Political Spaces of Urban Poverty Management.” In Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics, edited by A. Jonas, B. Miller, K. Ward, and D. Wilson, 307–319. New York: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Ferge, Zs. 2017. Magyar társadalom- és szociálpolitika 1990–2015. Budapest: Osiris .
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., and D. McAdam. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York, NY: Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. 1994. “Positive Functions of the Undeserving Poor: Uses of the Underclass in America .” Politics & Society 22 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329294022001001.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. 2015. Are We All Postracial Yet? Cambridge: Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Havasi, V. 2018. “Még mindig szilánkos- Miskolc és a cigányság lakhatási ügyei az elmúlt harminc évben .” Romológia: Romológiai Folyóirat 1: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Hegedüs, J. 2013. “Housing Privatization and Restitution.” In Social Housing in Transition Countries, edited by József Hegedüs, Nóra Teller, and Martin Lux, 33–49. New York: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Hegedüs, J., Á Kullmann, E. Somogyi, and N. Teller. 2016. Komplex telep-program értékelése (TÁMOP 5.3.6-11) Városkutatás Kft., Budapest (Kézirat).
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh, H., E. Eizenberg, and Y. Jabareen. 2020. “A New Conceptual Framework for Understanding Displacement: Bridging the Gaps in Displacement Literature between the Global South and the Global North .” Journal of Planning Literature 35 (4): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220921514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinek, Cs. 2010. “The Phenomena of Displacement and Relocation during the Process of Gentrification in Budapest.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Sociologia, 105-116.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, Cs. 2020. ““Gúzsba kötve táncolunk” – Zsugorodás és a kontroll leszivárgásának a politikai gazdaságtana magyarországi középvárosokban .” Szociológiai Szemle 30 (2): 115–136. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.2020.2.6.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, Cs, and T. Virág. 2020. “Zsugorodó városok és társadalmi egyenlőtlenségek Magyarországon .” Szociológiai Szemle 30 (2): 4–26. https://doi.org/10.51624/SzocSzemle.2020.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J., and T. Virág. 2021. “Intézményi környezet és helyi fejlesztések: elköteleződések szabta lehetőségek a telepprogramok megvalósításában .” Tér és Társadalom 35 (4): 190–214. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.35.4.3371.
   Google Scholar
• Kemény, I. 1976. Beszámoló a magyarországi cigányok helyzetével foglalkozó, 1971-ben végzett kutatásról. Budapest: MTA Szociológiai Kutató Intézet Kézirat .
   Google Scholar
• Kemény, I., and B. Janky. 2004. “Települési és lakásviszonyok .” Beszélő 9 (4): 96–110.
   Google Scholar
• Koós, B. 2020. “Városi zsugorodás és lakóhelyi szegregáció az ezredforduló után .” Tér és Társadalom 34 (1): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.34.1.3182.
   Google Scholar
• Ladányi, J., and I. Szelényi. 2006. Patterns of Exclusion: Constructing Gypsy Ethnicity and the Making of an Underclass in Transitional Societies of Europe. New York, NY: Columbia University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Lancione, M. 2019. “The Politics of Embodied Urban Precarity: Roma People and the Fight for Housing in Bucharest, Romania .” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 101: 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 1985. “Gentrification, Abandonment and Displacement: Connections, Causes and Policy Responses in New York City’ .” Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law 28: 195–240.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 1997. “The Enclave, the Citadel, and the Ghetto: What Has Changed in the Post-Fordist US City .” Urban Affairs Review 33 (2): 228–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749703300206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méreiné-Berki, B., G. Málovics, and R. Creţan. 2021. “‘You Become One With the Place’: Social Mixing, Social Capital, and the Lived Experience of Urban Desegregation in the Roma Community .” Cities 117: 103302–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misetics, Bálint. 2017. “Lakáspolitika és hajléktalanság.” In Magyar társadalom- és szociálpolitika. 1990–2015, edited by Zsuzsa Ferge, 338–363. Budapest: Osiris .
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, P. 2012. “„Ahol a vállalatvezetés az úr … ” A Rimamurányi-Salgótarjáni Vasmű Rt. szociális és jóléti intézményrendszere Ózdon .” Korall 13 (49): 17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Picker, G. 2017. Racial Cities: Governance and the Segregation of Romani People in Urban Europe. London: Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Pósfai, Zs, and Cs Jelinek. 2019. “Reproducing Socio-Spatial Unevenness through the Institutional Logic of Dual Housing Policies in Hungary.” In Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarization. New Geographies of Europe, edited by T. Lang and F. Görmar, 197–223. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Pósfai, Z., and G. Nagy. 2018. “Crisis and the Reproduction of Core-Periphery Relations on the Hungarian Housing Market .” European Spatial Research and Policy 24 (2): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/esrp-2017-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R., and H. Van Baar. 2019. “The Invisibilization of ANTI-ROMA RACISMS.” In The Securitization of the Roma in Europe, edited by H. Baar, A. Ivasiuc, and R. Kreide, 91–113. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Seim, J. 2017. “The Ambulance: Toward a Labor Theory of Poverty Governance .” American Sociological Review 82 (3): 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417702367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J., R. Fording, and F. Schram. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Szalai, J. 2013. Hungary’s Bifurcated Welfare State: Splitting Social Rights and the Social Exclusion of Roma Adam Smith Foundation Working Papers 2013:5. Glasgow: University of Glasgow .
   Google Scholar
• Szalai, J. 2020. “The Impact of Multi-faceted Segregation on Roma Collective Identity and Citizenship Rights.” In The Roma and Their Struggle for Identity in Contemporary Europe, edited by H. van Baar and A. Kóczé, 69–93. Brooklyn, NY: Berghahn Books .
   Google Scholar
• Szalai, J., and V. Zentai. 2014. Faces and Causes of Roma Marginalization in Local Contexts. Budapest: Center for Policy Studies .
   Google Scholar
• Szelényi, I. 1983. Urban Inequalities under State Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Szikra, D. 2018. Welfare for the Wealthy: The Social Policy of the Orbán-Regime, 2010–2017. Budapest: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung .
   Google Scholar
• Szikra, D. 2014. “Democracy and Welfare in Hard Times: The Social Policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014 .” Journal of European Social Policy 24 (5): 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714545446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szombati, K. 2018. The Revolt of the Provinces. Anti-Gypsyism and Right-Wing Politics in Rural Hungary. New York: Berghan Books .
   Google Scholar
• Thieme, T., M. Lancione, and E. Rosa. 2017. “The City and Its Margins: Ethnographic Challenges Across Makeshift Urbanism: Introduction .” City 21 (2): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1353331.
   Google Scholar
• Van Baar, H. 2017. “Contained Mobility and the Racialization of Poverty in Europe: The Roma at the Development–Security Nexus .” Social Identities 24 (4): 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1335826.
   Google Scholar
• van Baar, H. 2018. “From ‘Lagging Behind’ to ‘Being Beneath’? The De-developmentalization of Time and Social Order in Contemporary Europe.” In The Securitization of the Roma in Europe. Human Rights Interventions, edited by H. van Baar, A. Ivasiuc, and R. Kreide, 159–182. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77035-2_8.
   Google Scholar
• Vidra, Zs. 2018. “Hungary's Punitive Turn: The Shift from Welfare to Workfare .” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigvári, A., and Á Gagyi. 2018. “Informal Practices in Housing Financialization: The Transformation of an Allotment Garden in Hungary .” Critical Housing Analysis 5 (2): 46–55. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2018.5.2.442.
   Google Scholar
• Vilenica, A., I. Florea, V. Popovici, and Zs Pósfai. 2021. “Urban Struggles and Theorising from Eastern European.” In Global Urbanism Knowledge, Power and the City, edited by M. Lancione and C. McFarlane. Routledge . https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259593.
   Google Scholar
• Vincze, E. 2019. “Ghettoization: The Production of Marginal Spaces of Housing and the Reproduction of Racialized Labour.” In Racialized Labour in Romania. Spaces of Marginality at the Periphery of Global Capitalism, edited by N. Petrovici, E. Vincze, and C. Raţ, 63–96. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Vincze, E., and G. Zamfir. 2019. “Racialized Housing Unevenness in Cluj-Napoca under Capitalist Redevelopment .” City 23 (4–5): 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1684078.
   Google Scholar
• Virág, T., and Cs. Jelinek. 2019. “Development Brokers and Place-Based Projects in Deprived Urban Neighbourhoods: The Case of Pécs .” Hungary. Justice Spatiale = Spatial Justice 2019: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Virág, T., and M. M. Váradi. 2018. “Spatial Exclusion and Boundary-Making in Different Roma Neighbourhoods in Hungarian Rural Small Towns .” Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 109 (4): 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the Poor, the Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham and London: Duke University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2011. “A Janus-Faced Institution of Ethnoracial Closure: A Sociological Specification of the Ghetto.” In The ghetto. Contemporary Global Issues and Controversies, edited by R. Hutchison and B. D. Haynes, 1–31. Boulder: Westview Press .
   Google Scholar