Sponsorship activities and the small firms sector

References

• Acs, Z. (1999) Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact, Norwell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. (1999) Small Firms and Efficiency, In: Z. Acs (ed.) Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact, Norwell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 21-38.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M.J. (1995) Marketing Theory and Practice, London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, A. W. (1998) Arts Smarts, Colorado Business Magazine, 25(10), 24-29.
   Google Scholar
• Benezra, K. (1996) Cause and Effects Marketing, Brandweek, April 22, 37(17), 38-41.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. and Curran, J. (1993) In Search of Spatial Differences: Evidence from a Study of Small Service Sector Enterprises, In: J. Curran and D. Storey (eds) Small Firms in Urban and Rural Locations, London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooksbank, D. (2000) Self-employment and Small Firms, In: S. Carter and D. Jones Evans (eds) Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy, London, FT Pitman, pp. 7-31.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Small Business Research Centre (1992) The State of British Enterprise, University of Cambridge, Small Business Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, B. (1999) Small Business, Entrepreneurship and Industrial Dynamics, In: Z. Acs (ed.) Are Small Firms Important? Their Role and Impact, Norwell, MA, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 99-110.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, D. (1993) A Philosophy for Marketing Education In Small Firms, Journal of Marketing Management, 9, 189-204.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. (1997) The Role of Farms In Rural Business Development. Unpublished PhD, University of Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. and Tzokas, N. (1999) Marketing Activities and the Performance of Small Firms: A Cross-National Study of European SMEs. Paper presented to the 22nd ISBA National Small Firms Conference, Leeds, November.
   Google Scholar
• Chaston, I. (1997) Small Firm Performance: Assessing the Interaction Between Entrepreneurial Style and Organizational Structure, Journal of Marketing Management, 31, 814-831.
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, A. and Hughes, A. (eds) (1996) The Changing State of British Enterprise, Cambridge, ESRC Centre for Business Research.
   Google Scholar
• Covln, J.G. and Slevin, O.P. (1988) The Influence of Organizational Structure on the Utility of Entrepreneurial Top Management Style, Journal of Management Studies, 25, 217-234.
   Google Scholar
• Covin, J.P. and Slevin, O.P. (1989) Strategic Management of Small Firms In Hostile and Benign Environments, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
   Google Scholar
• Crosier, K. (1995) Marketing Communications, In: M.J. Baker (ed.) Marketing Theory and Practice, London, Macmillan, pp. 216-249.
   Google Scholar
• CSO (1994) Annual Abstract of Statistics, London, HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, J. (1999) The Role of the Small Firm in the UK Economy: Hot Stereotypes and Cool Assessments, London, Small Business Research Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande, R. and Webster, F. E. (1989) Organizational Culture and Marketing: Defining the Research Agenda, Journal of Marketing, 53, 3-16.
   Google Scholar
• ENSR (1997) The European Observatory for SMEs --Fifth Annual Report European Network for SME Research, Zoetermeer, EIM Small Business Research and Consultancy.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. (1984) Corporate Innovation: Marketing and Strategy, New York, St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, M.P. and Shuman, P. (1988) Sponsorship and Small Business, Journal of Small Business Management, 26, 44-52.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, A. (1998) Goodwill Hunting, The Director, December, pp. 54-58
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B., and Kohli, A. (1993) Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
   Google Scholar
• Kadlec, D. (1997) The New World of Giving: Companies are Doing More Good and Demanding More Back, Time, 149(18), 62-65.
   Google Scholar
• Kitson, M. and Wilkinson, F. (1996) Markets and Competition, In: A. Cosh and A. Hughes (eds) The Changing State of British Enterprise, University of Cambridge, ESRC Centre for Business Research, pp. 22-31.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A., and Jaworski, B. (1990) Marketing Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions and Managerial Implications, Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A., Jaworski, B. and Kumar, A. (1993) MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation, Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 467-477.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, R. W. (1999) Event Sponsorship: an Exploratory Study of Small Business Objectives, Practices and Perceptions, Journal of Small Business Management, 37(3), 25-31.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, E. (1981) Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach, Homewood, IL, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, E. and Perreault, W.D. (1984) Basic Marketing, Homewood, IL, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.P. and Arnold, D.R. (1991) The Relationship Between Marketing Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 49-65.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P. (1997) Companies Unearth a Goldmine of Goodwill: Using Generosity as a Marketing Strategy, Denver Business Journal, 48(50), 19-21.
   Google Scholar
• Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990) The Effect of Market Orientation on Business Profitability, Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, L.W. (1981) Assessing Measurement Error In Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note On Organizational Analysis In Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 395-415.
   Google Scholar
• Sachittal, H.C. and Wilemon, D. (1996) Marketing Implementation In Small and Mid-sized Industrial Firms, Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 67-78.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, T. and Bentz, L. (1996) The Involvement of small businesses In sport sponsorship, Managing Leisure, 1, 175-184.
   Google Scholar
• Sleight, S. (1989) Sponsorship: What Is It and How to Use It, Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Smallbone, D. North, D. and Leigh, R. (1993) The growth and survival of mature manufacturing SMEs In the 1980s: an urban-rural comparison, In: J. Curran and D. Storey (eds) Small Firms in Urban and Rural Locations, London, Routledge, pp. 79-131
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C.C. and Hrebiniak, L.G. (1980) Strategy, Distinctive Competence and Organizational Performance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 317-336.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, D. (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector, London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeting, R. (1995) Competition, Cooperation and Changing the Manufacturing Infrastructure, Regional Studies, 29, 87-94.
   Google Scholar
• Taub, D. (1999) Washington Mutual Wins Big from Van Gogh Sponsorship, Los Angeles Business Journal, 21(35), 8.
   Google Scholar
• Thornycroft, T. (2000) Making Friends In High Places: Sponsorship, Financial Times, April 3rd, p. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1996) The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 61, 674-698.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hlppel, E. (1988) The Sources of Innovation, New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, R. (1998) IAFE Session Studies: The Art of Sponsorship, Amusement Business, 110(50), p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Weinrauch, J.D., Mann, O.K., Pharr, J.M. and Robinson, P.A. (1991) Marketing Strategies of Small Industrial Manufacturers, Industrial Marketing Management, 20, 251-259.
   Google Scholar
• Witcher, B. Craigen, J.G. Culligan, D. and Harvey, A. (1991) The Link Between Objectives and Function In Organizational Sponsorship, International Journal of Advertising, 10, 13-33.
   Google Scholar