Understanding the local sports council as a mechanism for community sport development

REFERENCES

• Allen, N. E. (2005). A multi-level analysis of community coordinating councils. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 49–63. doi: 10.1007/s10464-005-1889-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloyce, D., Smith, A., Mead, R., & Morris, J. (2008). ‘Playing the game (plan)’: A figurational analysis of organizational change in sports development in England. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8, 359–379. doi: 10.1080/16184740802461637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, N., Fleming, S., & Elias, B. (2008). The experience of community sport development: A case study of Blaenau Gwent. Managing Leisure, 13, 92–103. doi: 10.1080/13606710801933446
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, C. (2006). Constructing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J., & Donnelly, P. (2009). Sports in society: Issues and controversies (2nd ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
   Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who's keeping the score? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. (1995). Sports development locally and regionally, Reading: Institute of Leisure and Amenity Management.
   Google Scholar
• Cousens, L., & Barnes, M. (2009). Sport delivery in a highly socialized environment: A case study of embeddedness. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 574–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, J. (2006). Community-based organizations – new fad or old hat?. Community Development Journal, 41, 521–527. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsl032
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, A. (2009). The well-connected community: A network approach to community development (2nd ed.). Portland, OR: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. The Grounded Theory Review, 4(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C. (2009). Grounded theory perspectives in organizational research. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, (pp. 381–394). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (2011). Introduction. In B. Houlihan & M. Green (Eds.), Handbook of sport development, (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoye, R., Nicholson, M., & Houlihan, B. (2010). Sport and policy: Issues and analysis, New York, NY: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, K., & Braham, P. (2008). Models of sports development. In V. Girginov (Ed.), Management of sports development, (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, K., & Totten, M. (2008). Community sports development. In K. Hylton & P. Braham (Eds.), Sports development: Policy, processes, and practice, (pp. 77–112). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K., & Caputo, T. (2005). Case study of grassroots community development: Sustainable, flexible and cost-effective responses to local needs. Community Development Journal, 41, 234–245. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsi052
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. (2005). Empowering people, facilitating community development, and contributing to sustainable development: The social work of sport, exercise, and physical education programs. Sport, Education and Society, 10, 135–160. doi: 10.1080/1357332052000308800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Misener, K., & Doherty, A. (2009). A case study of organizational capacity in community sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 457–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Sports Commissions. (2010). About NASC. Retrieved March 3, 2011, from http://www.sportscommissions.org/About-NASC
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, G., & James, M. (2008). One size does not fit all: Implications of sport club diversity for their effectiveness as a policy tool and for government support. Managing Leisure, 13, 104–114. doi: 10.1080/13606710801933461
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, M., Hoye, R., & Houlihan, B. (Eds.). (2011). Participation in sport: International policy perspectives, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, B., Foster-Fishman, P. (2011). Examining multi-sector community collaboratives as vehicles for building organizational capacity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 193–207. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9364-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. (2007). Sport and civic engagement: Community governance and the sport policy process. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2, 417–425. doi: 10.1504/IJSMM.2007.013714
   Google Scholar
• Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, L., Frisby, W., & Kikulis, L. (1999). Interorganizational linkages in the delivery of local leisure services in Canada: Responding to economic, political and social pressures. Managing Leisure, 4, 125–141. doi: 10.1080/136067199375805
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M. (2009). Research quality considerations for grounded theory research in sport & exercise psychology. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 502–510.
   Google Scholar
• Zakocs, R. C., & Edwards, E. M. (2006). What explains community coalition effectiveness? A review of the literature. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar