REFERENCES
- van den Berg, H. (2003). Contradictions in interview discourse. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analysing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview, (pp. 119–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Chappelet, J.-L. (2008). Olympic environmental concerns as a legacy of the Winter Games. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 1884–1902. doi: 10.1080/09523360802438991
- Coalter, J. A. (2004). Stuck in the blocks? A sustainable sporting legacy. In A. Vigor, M. Mean & C. Tims (Eds.), After the gold rush: A sustainable Olympics for London, (pp. 91–108). London: ippr and Demos.
- Curi, M., Knijnik, J., & Mascarenhas, G. (2011). The Pan American Games in Rio de Janeiro 2007: Consequences of a sport mega-event on a BRIC country. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(2), 140–156. doi: 10.1177/1012690210388461
- Da Matta, R. (1991). Carnivals, rogues, and heroes: An interpretation of the Brazilian dilemma, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Da Matta, R. (1997). A casa e a rua: Espaço, cidadania, mulher e morte no Brasil (5th ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
- Da Matta, R. (2004). O que é o Brasil?, Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
- Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- International Olympic Committee (2011). Olympic charter, Lausanne: IOC.
- Jeong, G., & Faulkner, B. (1996). Resident perceptions of mega-event impacts: The Taejon International Exposition case. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 4(1/2), 3–11. doi: 10.3727/106527096792232388
- Jesus, G. (1999). Construindo a cidade moderna: A introdução dos esportes na vida urbana do Rio de Janeiro. Revista Estudos Históricos, 13(23), 17–39.
- Keogh, L. (2009). London 2012 Olympic legacies: Conceptualising legacy, the role of communities and local government and the regeneration of East London, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
- London Assembly (2010). Legacy limited? A review of the Olympic Park Legacy Company's role, London: Economic Development, Culture, Sport and Tourism Committee.
- London East Research Institute, University of East London (2007). Lasting legacy for London? Assessing the legacy of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games, London: LERI.
- Mascarenhas, G., Borges, F. C. S. (2009). Entre o empreendedorismo urbano e a gestão democrática da cidade: Dilemas e impactos do Pan-2007 na Marina da Glória. Esporte e Sociedade, 4(10), 1–26.
- Minnaert, L. (2012). An Olympic legacy for all? The non-infrastructural outcomes of the Olympic Games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996–Beijing 2008). Tourism Management, 33(2), 361–370. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.04.005
- Reis, A. C., & DaCosta, L. P. (2012). Sustainability dilemmas for Brazil in hosting mega-sport events. In G. Lohmann & D. Dredge (Eds.), Tourism in Brazil: Environment, management and segments, (pp. 60–76). London: Routledge.
- Rio 2016 (2009). Candidature file for Rio de Janeiro to host the 2006 Olympic and Paralympic Games, Rio de Janeiro: Rio 2016.1
- Taylor, M. (2010). HaCCUTss jeitinho or threat to democracy?. In D. Morris & C. H. Blake (Eds.), Corruption and politics in Latin America: National and regional dynamics, (pp. 89–112). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
- Weed, M., Coren, E., & Fiore, J. (2009). A systematic review of the evidence base for developing a physical activity and health legacy from the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games, London: Department of Health.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112443/Skyscraper-socialsciences.png"})