A unified model of non-profit sport organizations performance: perspectives from the literature

REFERENCES

• Arrington, B., Gautam, K., & McCabe, W. (1995). Leveraging the process: Continually improving performance. Hospital and Health Services Administration, 40(1), 95–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balduck, A. (2009). Effectiveness in sport on micro and meso management level (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiteit Gent, Gent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Ramalho, N. (2006). Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 39–65. doi: 10.1177/0899764005282468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayle, E., & Madella, A. (2002). Development of a taxonomy of performance for national sport organizations. European Journal of Sport Science, 2(2), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/17461390200072205
   Google Scholar
• Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2007). A framework for understanding the performance of national governing bodies of sport. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(3), 249–268. doi: 10.1080/16184740701511037
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539–553. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelladurai, P. (1987). Multidimensionality and multiple perspectives of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Sport Management, 1, 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Chelladurai, P., Szyszlo, M., & Haggerty, T. R. (1987). System-based dimensions of effectiveness: The case of national sport organizations. Canadian Journal of Sport Science, 12, 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., Conlon, E. J., & Deutsch, S. J. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5, 211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., & Friedberg, E. (1977). L'acteur et le système: les contraintes de l'action collective [The actor and the system: The constraints of the collective action]. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Cuskelly, G., Taylor, T., Hoye, R., & Darcy, S. (2006). Volunteer management practices and volunteer retention: A human resource management approach. Sport Management Review, 9(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(06)70023-7
   Google Scholar
• Ferkins, L., Shilbury, D., & McDonald, G. (2009). Board involvement in strategy: Advancing the governance of sport organizations. Journal of Sport Management, 23(3), 245–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, W. (1986). The organizational structure and effectiveness of voluntary organization: The case of Canadian sport governing bodies. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 3, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(2), 107–126. doi: 10.1177/0899764099282001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory Nine theses. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(4), 399–415. doi: 10.1002/nml.195
   Google Scholar
• Koski, P. (1995). Organizational effectiveness of Finnish sports clubs. Journal of sport Management, 9(1), 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, B. J., Rho, H. D., Kim, T. J., Chung, U. K., Sinbok, K., & Park, J. K. (1994). Priorities of financial investments in mass sport in Korea. Journal of Sport Management, 8, 57–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madella, A., Bayle, E., & Tome, J. (2005). The organizational performance of national swimming federations in Mediterranean countries: A comparative approach. European Journal of Sport Science, 5(4), 207–220. doi: 10.1080/17461390500344644
   Google Scholar
• Mouzas, S. (2006). Efficiency versus effectiveness in business networks. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1124–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S., & Swan, J. (1995). The diffusion of innovations in sport organizations: An evaluative framework. Journal of Sport Management, 9(3), 317–333.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D. (2002). Amateur structures and their effect on performance: The case of Greek voluntary sports clubs. Managing Leisure, 7, 205–219. doi: 10.1080/1360671021000056570
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D. (2007). Conceptualizing effectiveness in a non-profit organizational environment: An exploratory study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(7), 571–587. doi: 10.1108/09513550710823498
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, D., & Taylor, P. (2000). Organizational effectiveness of Hellenic national sports organizations: A multiple constituency approach. Sport Management Review, 3, 23–46. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(00)70078-7
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1977). Usefulness of the concept. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 132–145). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. L. (1968). The study of organizational effectiveness. The Sociological Quarterly, 13, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363–377. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, J. (2005). Paid staff in voluntary sporting organizations. Do they help or hinder? In G. Nichols & M. Collins (Eds.), Volunteers in sports clubs (pp. 35–56). Eastbourne: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1977). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 63–95). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shilbury, D., & Moore, K. A. (2006). A study of organizational effectiveness for national Olympic sporting organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 5–38. doi: 10.1177/0899764005279512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sandfort, J. R. (2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 711–728. doi: 10.1177/0899764004269146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steers, R. M. (1977). Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11, 801–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, E. J., & Dawson, S. (2001). Managers’ perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 173–199. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winand, M., Rihoux, B., Qualizza, D., & Zintz, T. (2011). Combinations of key determinants of performance in sport governing bodies. Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal, 1(3), 234–251. doi: 10.1108/20426781111162657
   Google Scholar
• Winand, M., Rihoux, B., Robinson, L., & Zintz, T. (2013). Pathways to high performance: A qualitative comparative analysis of sport governing bodies. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 739–762. doi: 10.1177/0899764012443312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winand, M., Zintz, T., Bayle, E., & Robinson, L. (2010). Organizational performance of Olympic sport governing bodies: Dealing with measurement and priorities. Managing Leisure, 15(4), 279–307. doi: 10.1080/13606719.2010.508672
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, R., Hoeber, L., & Babiak, K. (2002). Perceptions of the effectiveness of sport organizations: The case of intercollegiate Athletics. European Sport Management Quarterly, 2, 135–156. doi: 10.1080/16184740208721917
   Google Scholar
• Yuchtman, E., & Seashore, E. S. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 32, 891–903. doi: 10.2307/2092843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar