Managing multi-purpose leisure facilities in a time of climate change

REFERENCES

• Aquatic and Recreation Victoria. (2009). Water usage and savings in aquatic facilities –best practice guidelines. Clayton: Smart Water Fund. Retrieved from http://www.aquaticsandrecreation.org.au/images/data/ARV%20Smart%20Water%20Best%20Practice%20Guide%20-%20Final%20-%2027%20April%202010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate. (2008). APP brochure. Sydney: Department of State Publications. Retrieved from http://www.asiapacificpartnership.org/pdf/brochure/APP_Booklet_English_Aug2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006). Social and economic index for areas (SEIFA). Canberra, ACT: Author. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/2039.0
   Google Scholar
• Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2012). Australian greenhouse office. Canberra, ACT: Author. Retrieved from http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/527041/fromItemId/815972/quickLinkId/815426/whichType/or
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J., & Clark, D. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, A., & Armstrong, M. (2007). Human capital management: Achieving added value through people. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Trust. (United Kingdom). (2008). Swimming pools: A deeper look at energy efficiency. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Clean Energy Future. (2010). Clean energy future. Canberra: The Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au/clean-energy-future/our-plan/
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Organisation and The Bureau of Meteorology. (2010). State of the climate. Collingwood: CSIRO. Retrieved from http://www.bom.gov.au/inside/eiab/State-of-climate-2010-updated.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design-qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DCCEE. (2011). National greenhouse and energy reporting. Canberra: Author. Retrieved from http://www.climatechange.gov.au/government/initiatives/national-greenhouse-energy-reporting/publication-of-data.aspx
   Google Scholar
• DCCEE. (2011a). The critical decade: Climate science, risks and responses. Canberra: Australian Climate Commission. Retrieved from http://climatecommission.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/4108-CC-Science-WEB_3-June.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dionigi, R. A., & Lyons, K. (2010). Examining layers of community in leisure contexts: A case analysis of older adults in an exercise intervention. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(2), 317–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, C., & Starik, M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: Advancing the conceptual consideration of the stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013852.62017.0e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability: A guide for leaders and change agents of the future (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz-enz, J. (2009). Disruptive technology for human resources. Employment Relations Today, 35(4), 1–10. doi: 10.1002/ert.20219
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., Kolk, A., & Winn, M. (2010). A new future for business? Rethinking management theory and business strategy. Business and Society, 49(3), 385–401. doi: 10.1177/0007650310371357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2009). The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: Case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 347–359. doi: 10.1002/bse.602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsh, S. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. doi:10.3316/QRJ1102063. doi: 10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural resource based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2010). A natural resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37, 1464–1479. doi:10.1177/0149206310390219. doi: 10.1177/0149206310390219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary green house gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21–46. doi: 10.2307/41166305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holper, P., & Torok, S. (2008). Climate change: what can we do about it? Sydney: Pan Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1990). Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment. (1990). In I. J. T. Houghton, G. J. Jenkins, & J. J. Ephraums (Eds.). Report prepared for intergovernmental panel on climate change by working group (pp. 51–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007a). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K., & Reisinger A. (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 70–89). Geneva: IPCC. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2007b). Summary for policymakers. In Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., & Meyer L. A. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 75–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2005). Business responses to climate change: Identifying emergent strategies. California Management Review, 47(3), 6–20. doi: 10.2307/41166304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2007). Towards strategic stakeholder management? Integrating perspectives on sustainability challenges such as corporate responses to climate change. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 370–378. doi: 10.1108/14720700710820452
   Google Scholar
• Lash, J., & Wellington, F. (2007). Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harvard Business Review, 859(3), 94–102.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. L., & Kolk, A. (2002). Strategic responses to global climate change: Conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry. Business and Politics, 4(3), 275–300. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1042
   Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Beyond adaptation: Resilience for business in light of climate change and weather extremes. Business & Society, 49(3), 477–511. doi: 10.1177/0007650310368814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2012). Assessing organisational resilience to climate and weather extremes: Complexities and methodological pathways. Climate Change, 113(3–4), 933–947. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0380-6. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0380-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenluecke, M., Griffiths, A., & Winn, M. (2011). Extreme weather events and the critical importance of anticipatory adaptation and organizational resilience in responding to impacts. Business Strategy and Environment, 21(1), 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauws, M. K., Mason, D. S., & Foster, W. M. (2003). Thinking strategically about professional sports. European Sport Management Quarterly, 3(3), 145–164. doi: 10.1080/16184740308721948
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K., Stewart, B., & Dingle, G. (2011). In the deep end: A study of multi-purpose leisure facility responses to climate change using a multi-site analysis. In M. Burke, C. Hanlon, & C. Thomen (Eds.), Sport and culture society: Approaches, methods and perspectives (pp. 89–106). Melbourne: Maribyrong Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., & Hays, T. (2008). In-depth interviewing (3rd ed.). Sydney: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Newbert, S. L. (2005). New firm formation: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(1), 55–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordaz, M., Huerta, B., & Reinoso, E. (2003). Exact computation of input-energy spectra from Fourier amplitude spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, 597–605. doi: 10.1002/eqe.240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2008). Strategy, climate change and the Japanese firm: Rethinking the global competitive landscape of a warming planet. Asian Business and Management, 17, 407–423. doi: 10.1057/abm.2008.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pinske, J., & Kolk, A. (2010). Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Reinhardt, F. L. (2007). A strategic approach to climate. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 22–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, D. L., & Wolfe, R. A. (2000). Examining sustainable competitive advantage in intercollegiate athletics: A resource-based view. Journal of Sport Management, 14(2), 133–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, N. (2006). What is the economics of climate change? World Economics, 7(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, F. G., & Freed, J. R. (2008). Adapting to climate change: A business approach. Arlington, VA: Pew Centre on Global Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Sustainability Victoria. (2011). Benchmark energy performance with best practice tracker. Melbourne: Author. Retrieved from http://www.resourcesmart.vic.gov.au/for_government/data_and_reporting_4161.html
   Google Scholar
• Winn, M. I., Kirchgeorg, M., Griffith, A., Linnenluecke, M. K., & Gunther, E. (2011). Impacts from climate change on organisations: A conceptual foundation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 157–173. DOI:10.1002/bse.679. doi: 10.1002/bse.679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittneben, B. B. F., & Kiyar, D. (2009). Climate change basics for managers. Management Decision, 47(7), 1122–1132. doi: 10.1108/00251740910978331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar