Personality assessment among older adults: the value of personality questionnaires unraveled

References

• Ackerman, T.A. (1992). A didactic explanation of item bias, item impact, and item validity from a multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2013). Guidelines for psychological practice with older adults. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Balsis, S., Gleason, M.E.J., Woods, C.M., & Oltmanns, T.F. (2007). An item response theory analysis of DSM-IV personality disorder criteria across younger and older age groups. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendse, H.P.J., Rossi, G., & van Alphen, S.P.J. (2013). Personality disorders in older adults: Expert opinion as a first step toward evaluating the criterion validity of an informant questionnaire (HAP). International Psychogeriatrics, 26(1), 173–174. doi:10.1017/S1041610213001312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barendse, H.P.J., & Thissen, A.J.C. (2006). Hetero-Anamnestische Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst (de HAP): handleiding [Informant Personality questionnaire (the HAP): Manual]. Den Bosch: Barendse & Thissen.
   Google Scholar
• Barendse, H.P.J., Thissen, A.J.C., Rossi, G., Oei, T.I., & van Alphen, S.P.J. (2013). Psychometric properties of an informant personality questionnaire (the HAP) in a sample of older adults in the Netherlands and Belgium, Aging & Mental Health, 17(5), 623–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.756458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervone, D., & Mischel, W. (2002). Personality science. In D. Cervone, & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in Personality Science (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L.A., & Ro, E. (2014). Three-pronged assessment of personality disorder and its consequences: Personality functioning, pathological traits, and psychosocial disability. Personality Disorders, Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 55–69. doi:10.1037/per0000063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, A., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T.F. (2004). Contrasting perspectives on personality problems: Descriptions from the self and others. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1499–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L.D., Balsis, S., Oltmanns, T.F. (2014). A longitudinal analysis of personality disorder dimensions and personality traits in a community sample of older adults: Perspectives from selves and informants. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 151–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual for NEO-PI-3, NEO FFI-3 & NEO-PI-R. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Debast, I., Rossi, G., van Alphen, S.P.J., Pauwels, E., Claes, L., Dierckx, E., … Schotte, C. (submitted). Age-neutrality of categorically and dimensionally measured DSM-5 Section II personality disorder criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Klonsky, E.D., Oltmanns, T.F., & Turkheimer, E. (2002). Informant-reports of personality disorder: Relation to self-reports and future research directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 300–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R.F., Derringer, J., Markon, K.E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A.E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Markon, K. E., Derringer, J., … Livesley, W. J. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM–5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170–191. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton, E.M., Shields, A.J., & Oltmanns, T.F. (2011). Five-factor model personality disorder prototypes in a community sample: Self- and informant-reports predicting interview-based DSM diagnoses. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2(4), 279–292.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzenweger, M. F., Johnson, M. D., & Willett, J. B. (2004). Individual growth curve analysis illuminates stability and change in personality disorder features: The longitudinal study of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61, 1015–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J.D. (2008). Measuring personality constructs: The advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, informant reports and behavioural assessments. Enquire, 1(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mooi, B., Comijs, H.C., De Fruyt, F., De Ritter, D., Hoesktra, H.A., & Beekman, A.T.F. (2011). A NEO-PI-R short form for older adults. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20, 135–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, L.C. (1991). Personality assessment inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Oltmanns, T.F., & Balsis, S. (2010). Assessment of personality disorders in older adults. In P.A. Lichtenberg (Ed.), Handbook of assessment in clinical gerontology (pp. 101–122). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Oltmanns, T.F., & Balsis, S. (2011). Personality disorders in later life: Questions about the measurement, course, and impact of disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 27, 321–349. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090310-120435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltmanns, T.F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In R.F. Krueger & J.L. Tackett (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosowsky, E., & Segal, D. (2010). Personality disorders in later life. In N.A. Pachana, K. Laidlaw, & B.G. Knight (Eds.), Casebook of clinical geropsychology: International perspectives on practice (pp. 195–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schotte, C.K.W., De Doncker, D., Vankerckhoven, C., Vertommen, H. & Cosyns, P. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1179–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, D.L., Coolidge, F.L., & Rosowsky, E. (2006). Personality disorders and older adults: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tackett, J.L., Balsis, S., Oltmanns, T.F., & Krueger, R.F. (2009). A unifying perspective on personality pathology across the life span: Developmental considerations for the fifth edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 687–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, S.P.J., Engelen, G.J.J.A., Kuin, Y., Hoijtink, H.J.A., & Derksen, J.J.L. (2006). A preliminary study of the diagnostic accuracy of the gerontological personality disorders scale (GPS). International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 862–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, J., Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., De Clercq, B. (2013). Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: A DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 487–494. doi: 10.1007/s10862-013-9364-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, J., Rossi, G., De Clercq, B., Dierckx, E., & Bastiaansen, L. (2012). Validation of the FFM PD count technique for screening personality pathology in later middle-aged and older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 17, 180–188. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.717258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broeck, J., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., & De Clercq, B. (2012). Potential age bias in the NEO-PI-R: differential item functioning in older versus younger adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 3, 361–369. doi: 10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2011). Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 104–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T.A., & Trull, T.J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig, R.A. (2008). Personality disorder in older adults: Assessment challenges and strategies. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(3), 298–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar