1,113
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring personality functioning in older adults: construct validity of the Severity Indices of Personality Functioning – Short Form (SIPP-SF)

, &
Pages 703-711 | Received 28 Aug 2015, Accepted 07 Feb 2016, Published online: 29 Feb 2016

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Bastiaansen, L., De Fruyt, F., Rossi, G., Schotte, C., & Hofmans, J. (2013). Personality disorder dysfunction versus traits: Structural versus conceptual issues. Personality Disorder: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 293–303. doi:10.1037/per0000018
  • Bender, D.S., Morey, L.C., & Skodol, A.E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 332–346.
  • Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J.H., & Verheul, R. (2012). Core features of personality disorder: Differentiating general personality dysfunctioning from personality traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 704–716.
  • Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J.H., & Verheul, R. (2014). Specific personality traits and general personality dysfunction as predictors of the presence and severity of personality disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 410–416, doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.834825
  • Browne, M.W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 108–132. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1279
  • Browne, M.W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111–150.
  • Chen, F., Curran, P.J., Bollen, K.A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494.
  • Clark, L.A., & Ro, E. (2014). Three-pronged assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders and its consequences: Personality functioning, pathological traits, and psychosocial disability. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 55–69. doi:10.1037/per0000063
  • Cohen, J. (2009). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Debast, I., Rossi, G., van Alphen, S.P.J., Pauwels, E., Claes, L., Dierckx, E., … Schotte, C.K.W. (2015). Age-neutrality of categorically and dimensionally measured DSM-5 Section II personality disorder criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 321–329. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1021814
  • Debast, I., van Alphen, S.P.J., Rossi, G., Tummers, J.H.A., Bolwerk, N., Derksen J.J.L., & Rosowsky E. (2014). Personality traits and personality disorders in late middle and old age: Do they remain stable? A literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 37, 253–271. doi:10.1080/07317115.2014.885917
  • Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Engels, G.I., Duijsens, I.J., Haringsma, R., & van Putten, C.M. (2003). Personality disorders in the elderly compared to four younger age groups: A cross-sectional study of community residents and mental health patients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 447–459.
  • Horn, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
  • Krueger, R.F., Derringer, J., Markon, K.E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A.E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.
  • Livesley, W.J. (2006). General assessment of personality disorder (GAPD) (Unpublished manuscript). Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • Livesley, W.J., & Jackson, D.N. (2009). Dimensional assessment of personality pathology - basic questionnaire. Technical manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M.E., & Kiers, H.A.L. (2011). The Hull method for selecting the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 340–364.
  • MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Preacher, K.J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611–637.
  • Marsh, H.W., Morin, A.J., Parker, P.D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
  • Morey, L.C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D.S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R.F., & Skodol, A.E. (2011). Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 347–353. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577853
  • Oltmanns, T.F., & Balsis, S. (2011). Personality disorders in later life: Questions about the measurement, course, and impact of disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 321–349.
  • Rossi, G., Van den Broeck, J., Dierckx, E., Segal, D., & van Alpen, S.P.J. (2014). Personality assessment among older adults: The value of personality questionnaires unraveled. Aging and Mental Health, 18, 936–940. doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.924089
  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • van Alphen, S.P.J., Rossi, G., Segal, D.L., & Rosowsky E. (2013). Issues regarding the proposed DSM-5 personality disorders in geriatric psychology and psychiatry. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 1–5. doi:10.1017/S1041610212001597
  • van Alphen, S.P.J., van Dijk, S.D.M., Videler, A.C., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., Bouckaert, F., & Oude Voshaar R.C (2015). Personality disorders in older adults: Emerging research issues. Current Psychiatry Reports, 17: 538. doi:10.1007/s11920-014-0538-9
  • Van den Broeck, J., Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., & De Clercq, B. (2013a). Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: A DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. Journal of Psychopathological Behavior and Assessment, 35, 487–494. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9364-3
  • Van den Broeck, J., Bastiaansen, L., Rossi, G., Dierckx, E., De Clercq, B., & Hofmans, J. (2013b). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 27, 1–14. doi:10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114
  • Van den Broeck, J., Rossi, G., Declercq, B., & Dierickx, E. (2012). Potential age bias in the NEO-PI-R: Differential item functioning in older versus younger adults. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 3, 361–369. doi:10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4
  • van der Heijden, P., Ingenhoven, T., Berghuis, H., & Rossi, G. (2014). DSM-5 persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst [DSM-5 personality inventory]: PID-5-NL. Dutch translation of The Personality Inventory for DSM-5® (PID-5) – Adult, 2011 (American Psychiatric Association). Amsterdam: Boom.
  • van Kampen, D., & de Beurs, E. (2009). DAPP-BQ: Dimensionale assessment van persoonlijkheidspathologie inclusief screeningsversie [Dimensional assessment of personality pathology, basic personality questionnaire and short form]. Amsterdam: Hogrefe.
  • Verheul, R., Andrea, A., Berghout, C.C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J.J.V., van der Kroft, P.J.A., … Fonagy, F. (2008). Severity indices of personality problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20, 23–34.
  • Wright, A.G. (2011). Qualitative and quantitative distinctions in personality disorder. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 370–379.
  • Wright, A.G.C., Thomas, K.M., Hopwood, C.J., Markon, K.E., Pincus, A.L., & Krueger, R.F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951–957. doi:10.1037/a0027669

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.