Observational assessment of communication to empower patients with dementia to make legally effective decisions – revalidation of CODEM_amb

References

• Aebi, C. (2002). Validierung der neuropsychologischen Testbatterie CERAD-NP: Eine Multi-Center-Studie. [Validation of the neuropsychological test battery CERAD-NP: A multi-center-study] [Doctoral dissertation]. Universität Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Bayles, K., & Tomoeda, C. (1994). The functional linguistic communication inventory. Canyonlands Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• COSMIN – Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments. (2019). COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 105(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratalli, C. M., Thompson, C. M., Holland, A. L., Wohl, C. B., & Ferketic, M. M. (1995). Functional assessment of communication skills for adults (ASHA FACS ).American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Haberstroh, J., Neumeyer, K., Krause, K., Franzmann, J., & Pantel, J. (2011). TANDEM: Communication training for informal caregivers of people with dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 15(3), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.536135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberstroh, J., Wollstadt, P., Knebel, M., Oswald, F., Schröder, J., & Pantel, J. (2013). Need for and challenges facing functional communication as outcome parameter in AD clinical trials. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 27(4), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e318299d28d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered. The person comes first. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitwood, T., & Bredin, K. (1992). A new approach to the evaluation of dementia care. Journal of Advances in Health and Nursing Care, 1(5), 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Knebel, M., Haberstroh, J., Kümmel, A., Pantel, J., & Schröder, J. (2016). CODEMamb – An observational communication behavior assessment tool for use in ambulatory dementia care. Aging & Mental Health, 20(12), 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1075959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmel, A., Haberstroh, J., & Pantel, J. (2014). CODEM instrument: Developing a tool to assess communication behavior in dementia. GeroPsych, 27(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000100
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (1994). Aging-associated cognitive decline. International Psychogeriatrics, 6(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610294001626
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5401.113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. C., Heyman, A., Mohs, R. C., Hughes, J. P., van Belle, G., Fillenbaum, G., Mellits, E. D., & Clark, C. (1989). The consortium to establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 39(9), 1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.39.9.1159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus users’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, T. (1997). The positive response schedule for severe dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 1(2), 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607869757290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, J., Schwarz, M., Eisemann, M., & Bauer, B. (2003). Quality of life as an indicator for successful geriatric in patient rehabilitation. A validation study of the “Vienna List”. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 37(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4943(03)00066-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, B., & Kurz, A. (1989). Kommunikationswege für Alzheimer Kranke [Ways to communicate for people with Alzheimer’s disease]. In V. M. Roth (Ed.), Kommunikation trotz gestörter Sprache. Aphasie-Demenz-Schizophrenie [Communication despite dysfunction in language. Aphasiadementia-schizophrenia] (pp. 129–141). Gunter Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, K. A., Butters, N., Mohs, R. C., Beekly, D., Edland, S., Fillenbaum, G., & Heyman, A. (1994). The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery. Neurology, 44(4), 609–614. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.44.4.609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wied, T. S., Knebel, M., Tesky, V. A., & Haberstroh, J. (2019). The human right to make one’s own choices – Implications for supported decision-making in persons with dementia. European Psychologist, 24(2), 146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar