Taking Sides: Determinants of Support for a Presidential System in TurkeyFootnote^*

^*This article was originally published with error. This version has been corrected. Please see Corrigendum (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1291293).

References

• Akaş, C. (2015) Kritik Kavşak: Parlamenter Sistem-Başkanlık Sistemi [Critical Juncture: Parliamentary System-Presidential System], Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Akşam. (2015) ‘Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan başkanlık sistemi ihtiyaçtır dedi [President Erdoğan Indicated that the Presidential System is a Necessity]’, 17 January, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/zwc354t.
   Google Scholar
• Aljazeera Turk. (2014) ‘Erdoğan: Tarafsız cumhurbaşkanı olmayacağım [Erdoğan: I will not be an Impartial President]’, 8 July, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/jeory8a.
   Google Scholar
• Aljazeera Turk. (2015) ‘Erdoğan: Bunun adı liderlik sistemidir [Erdoğan: This is a Leadership System]’, 20 February, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/jvcfpmb.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C.J. & Guillory, C. A. (1997). ‘Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: a cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems’, American Political Science Review, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 66–81.10.2307/2952259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. E. & Çarkoğlu, A. 2015. ‘Türkiye’de başkanlık sistemine kamuoyu desteği [Public support for presidential system in Turkey]’, in Kritik Kavşak: Parlamenter Sistem-Başkanlık Sistemi [Critical Juncture: Parliamentary System-Presidential System], eds C. Akaş, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. E. & Öniş, Z. (2014). ‘Varieties of populism in a changing global context: the divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo’, Comparative Politics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 41–59.10.5129/001041514813623137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardakçı, M. (2016) ‘Parliamentary elections in Turkey: demise and revival of AKP’s single-party rule’, Turkish Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 4–18.10.1080/14683849.2015.1136084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., Donovan, T. & Karp, J. A. (2006) ‘Why politicians like electoral institutions: self-interest, values, or ideology?’, Journal of Politics, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 434–446.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. & Stokes, D. E. (1960) The American Voter, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. (2007) ‘A new electoral victory for the ‘pro-Islamists’ or the ‘new centre-right’? The Justice and Development Party phenomenon in the July 2007 parliamentary elections in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 501–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. (2012a) ‘Voting behavior in Turkey’, in Handbook of Modern Turkey, eds M. Heper & S. Sayarı, Routledge, New York, pp. 160-170.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. (2012b) ‘Economic evaluations vs. ideology: diagnosing the sources of electoral change in Turkey, 2002–2011’, Electoral Studies, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 513–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. & Yıldırım, K. (2015). ‘Election storm in Turkey: what do results of June and November 2015 election results tell us?’, Insight Turkey, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Diken. (2016) ‘Yazar İsmail Beşikçi’den HDP’ye eleştiri: Başkan’la pazarlık daha etkili olurdu [Criticism to HDP from Author İsmail Beşikçi: Deals with a President would have been more Effective]’, 9 June, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/hmsq9ej.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, U. (2015) ‘MHP: Election board now one with Erdoğan’, Hurriyet Daily News, 8 May, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/mmo3ld5.
   Google Scholar
• Ergüder, Ü. (2015) ‘Başkanlık mı parlamenter sistem mi? [Presidentialism or Parliamentary System?]’ in Kritik Kavşak: Parlamenter Sistem-Başkanlık Sistemi [Critical Juncture: Parliamentary System-Presidential System], ed C. Akaş, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, pp. 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Gönenç, L. (2008) ‘Presidential elements in government: Turkey’, European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 488–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürriyet Daily News. (2015) ‘CHP applies to constitutional court for breach of presidential ‘impartialness’’, 28 May, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/z3ccyg5.
   Google Scholar
• Hürriyet Daily News. (2016) ‘AKP, MHP take major step for system change’, 28 May, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/j9hpu8r.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (1994) ‘Elections and party preferences in Turkey: changes and continuities in the 1990s’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 402–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2008) ‘Attitudinal orientation to party organisations in Turkey in the 2000s’, Turkish Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2015) ‘Turkish popular presidential elections: deepening legitimacy issues and looming regime change’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 157–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (2015) ‘Winds of change? The June 2015 parliamentary election in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 445–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2004) ‘Constitutional design for divided societies’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 96–109.10.1353/jod.2004.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J.J. (1990) ‘The perils of presidentialism’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardin, Ş. (1973) ‘Center-periphery relations: a key to Turkish politics?’, Daedalus, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, G.A. (1994) ‘Delegative democracy’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 55–69. 10.1353/jod.1994.0010
   Google Scholar
• Özsoy, Ş. (2010) ‘What does Turkey’s new choice of popular presidential elections mean?’, European Public Law, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, J., Gier, N. & Bernauer, J. (2016) ‘I the People? Self-Interest and demand for government responsiveness’, Comparative Political Studies, 1–28. Available online at: 10.1177/0010414015621078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabah. (2014) ‘Başbakan’dan ilk adaylık konuşması [The first candidacy speech from the Prime Minister]’, 1 July, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/jug972k
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A. & Skach, C. (1993) ‘Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: parliamentarianism versus presidentialism’, World Politics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–22.10.2307/2950664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TRT Haber. (2014) ‘Erdoğan: Alışılmış cumhurbaşkanı olmam [Erdoğan: I will not be a Customary President]’, 6 December, available online at: http://tinyurl.com/kb6lgj9.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.10.1017/CBO9780511818691
   Google Scholar