References
- AK Parti. (2019a) ‘Kampanya Kimliği’ [Campaign identity], available online at: https://www.akadaylar.com/kampanya-kimligi-safha-2.html#p62
- AK Parti. (2019b) ‘Manifesto’ [Electoral Platform], available online at: https://akadaylar.com/Manifesto_28Ocak2019.pdf
- Ark-Yıldırım, C. (2017) ‘Political parties and grassroots clientelist strategies in urban Turkey: one neighbourhood at a time’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 473–490.
- Aydın-Düzgit, S. & Balta, E. (2018) ‘When elites polarise over polarisation: framing the polarisation debate in Turkey’, New Perspectives on Turkey, vol. 560, pp. 153–176.
- Bayraktar, U. S. & Altan, C. (2013) ‘Explaining Turkish party centralism: traditions and trends in the exclusion of local party offices in Mersin and beyond’, in Negotiating Political Power in Turkey: Breaking up the Party, eds E. Massicard & N. F. Watts, Routledge, London, pp. 17–36.
- BBC Türkçe. (2019a) ‘Yerel Seçim: siyasi partilerin aday listeleri nasıl şekillendi’ [Local elections: Parties’ lists of nominees], 19 February. available online at: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-47296568
- BBC Türkçe. (2019b) ‘İstanbul seçimi - Pontus tartışması 23 Haziran’da sonucu etkiler mi?’ [İstanbul election: can the Pontus debate influence], 13 June. available online at: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-48621611
- Bianet. (2019) ‘Everything you need to know about Turkey’s 2019 local elections’, 25 March. available online at: https://Bianet.org/english/diger/206574-everything-you-need-to-know-about-turkey-s-2019-local-elections
- BloombergHT. (2019) ‘TCMB: gıda enflasyonu taze sebze meyve fiyatlarındaki artışa bağlı olarak yükseldi’ [Turkish Central bank: Fresh produce prices increased the inflation], 4 April. available online at: https://www.bloomberght.com/tcmb-cekirdek-gostergeler-ana-egilimi-dusuk-seviyeleri-korundu-2209861
- Çalışkan, K. (2018) ‘Toward a new political regime in Turkey: from competitive toward full authoritarianism’, New Perspectives on Turkey, vol. 58, pp. 5–33.
- Çarkoğlu, A. (2008) ‘‘Ideology or economic pragmatism?: profiling Turkish voters in 2007ʹ’, Turkish Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 317–344.
- Ciddi, S. & Esen, B. (2014) ‘Turkey’s Republican People’s Party: politics of opposition under a dominant party system’, Turkish Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 419–441.
- CNNTürk. (2019) ‘CHP ve İYİ Parti Ittifakının detayları belli oldu’ [the details of the CHP-İYİ Party alliance gets clear], 25 January. available online at: https://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/kilicdaroglu-ve-aksenerden-ortak-aciklama
- DW. (2019) ‘IBB eski yönetimi Erdoğan’a yakın vakıflara ne kadar yardım yaptı?’ [How much did the former Municipal government donate to pro-Erdoğan foundations?], 19 April. available online at: https://www.dw.com/tr/ibb-eski-yönetimi-erdoğana-yakın-vakıflara-ne-kadar-para-yardımı-yaptı/a-48397744
- Eligür, B. (2010) The Mobilization of Political Islam in Turkey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Ercan, H. (2019) ‘Is hope more precious than victory? The failed peace process and urban warfare in the Kurdish Region of Turkey’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 111–127.
- Erdoğan, E. (2016) ‘Turkiye’de Kutuplaşmanın Boyutları Araştırması’, available online at: http://kssd.org/site/dl/uploads/Kutuplaşma-Araştırması-Sonuçları.pdf
- Esen, B. & Gumuscu, S. (2016) ‘Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1581–1606.
- Esen, B. & Gumuscu, S. (2017a) ‘Turkey: how the coup failed’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 59–73.
- Esen, B. & Gumuscu, S. (2018a) ‘Building a competitive authoritarian regime: state–business relations in the AKP’s Turkey’, Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 349–372.
- Esen, B. & Gumuscu, S. (2018b) ‘The perils of Turkish presidentialism’, Review of Middle East Studies, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 43–53.
- Esen, B. & Gumuscu, S. (2017b) ‘‘A small yes for presidentialism: the Turkish constitutional referendum of April 2017ʹ’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 303–326.
- Esen, B. & Yardimci-Geyikçi, Ş. (2019) ‘The Turkish presidential elections of 24 June 2018’, Mediterranean Politics. doi:10.1080/13629395.2019.1619912
- Euronews. (2019a) ‘Turkish opposition turns to radical love to smother Erdoğan’, available online at: https://www.euronews.com/2019/04/24/turkish-opposition-turns-to-radical-love-to-battle-Erdogan
- Euronews. (2019b) ‘23 haziran seçimlerinde yurttaş insiyatifleri’ [Civic initiatives in June 23 election], 22 June. available online at: https://tr.euronews.com/2019/06/22/23-haziran-secimlerinde-gonulluler-neden-organize-oldular
- Fisunoğlu, A. & Sert, D. Ş. (2019) ‘Refugees and elections: the effects of Syrians on voting behavior in Turkey’, International Migration, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 298–312.
- GazeteDuvar. (2019) ‘CHP’de 18 saatlik toplantının perde arkası’ [The Background Story of the 18-hour long meeting in the CHP], 28 January. available online at: https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/politika/2019/01/29/chpde-18-saatlik-toplantinin-perde-arkasi/
- Gidengil, E. & Karakoç, E. (2016) ‘Which matters more in the electoral success of Islamist (successor) parties–religion or performance? The Turkish case’, Party Politics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 325–338.
- Grigoriadis, I. N. (2016) ‘The Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) and the 2015 elections’, Turkish Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39–46.
- Gumuscu, S. (2013) ‘The emerging predominant party system in Turkey’, Government and Opposition, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 223–244.
- Gumuscu, S. (2019) ‘In Turkey, the latest elections had over 80 percent voter turnout. Here is why’, The Washington Post, 30 June. available online at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/06/30/turkey-latest-elections-had-over-percent-voter-turnout-heres-why/
- Howard, M. M. & Roessler, P. G. (2006) ‘Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 365–381.
- Hürriyet. (2019) ‘Son dakika: cumhur ittifakı genişliyor’ [People’s alliance expands], 19 February. available online at: http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/son-dakika-cumhur-ittifaki-genisliyor-4-il-mhpye-17-il-ak-partiye-41122630
- Independent Turkish. (2019) ‘Istanbul, Yeşilli, ve Mustafakemalpaşa: YSK’dan üç itirazda iki farklı karar’ [Two different YSK decisions in three objections: Istanbul, Yeşilli and Mustafakemalpasa], 9 May. available online at: https://www.independentturkish.com/node/29506/haber/istanbul-ye%C5%9Filli-ve-mustafa-kemal-pa%C5%9Fa-yskdan-%C3%BC%C3%A7-itirazda-iki-farkl%C4%B1-karar
- İYİ Parti. (2019) ‘Manifesto’ [Electoral Platform], available online at: https://iyiparti.org.tr/Assets/KurumsalKimlik/YerelSecim/iyiparti2019manifesto.pdf
- Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2015) ‘Turkish popular presidential elections: deepening legitimacy issues and looming regime change’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 157–179.
- Karar. (2019a) ‘Liderlerin seçim mesaisi’ [Leaders’ campaign traffic], March 29. available online at: https://www.karar.com/secim-2019/liderlerin-secim-mesaisi-1164919
- Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (2015) ‘Winds of change? The June 2015 parliamentary election in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 445–464.
- Kemahlioğlu, Ö. & Özdemir, E. (2018) ‘Municipal control as incumbency advantage: an analysis of the AKP era’, in Party Politics in Turkey, eds S. Sayarı, P. Ayan-Musil & Ö. Demirkol, Routledge, London, pp. 116–135.
- Konda. (2016) ‘Suriyeli Sığınmacılara Bakış’ [Perceptions towards Syrian refugees], available online at: http://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/suriyeli-siginmacilara-bakis/
- Konda. (2019a) ‘31 Mart Yerel Seçimlerinin Sayısal Analizi’ [The Numerical Analysis of the March 31 Election], available online at: https://konda.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/1904Nisan_Barometre_97_Kamuoyu.pdf
- Konda. (2019b) ‘23 Haziran 2019 Sandık Analizi ve Seçmen Profilleri’ [23 June 2019 Electoral Analysis and Voters’ Profile], available online at: http://konda.com.tr/tr/rapor/23-haziran-2019-sandik-analizi-ve-secmen-profilleri/
- Martin, N. (2018) ‘The AK Party and the Kurds since 2014: a discourse of terror’, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 543–558.
- McCoy, J., Rahman, T. & Somer, M. (2018) ‘Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities’, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 16–42.
- NTV. (2019a) ‘Ankara’da cumhur ittifakı mitingi’ [People’s Alliance rally in Ankara], 23 March. available online at: https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/ankarada-cumhur-ittifaki-mitingi,MZbw3a7Bn0aHxL4-BpcIdg
- Öniş, Z. (2015) ‘Monopolising the centre: the AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy’, The International Spectator, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 22–41.
- Öniş, Z. (2016) ‘Turkey’s two elections: the AKP comes back’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 141–154.
- Sabah. (2019) ‘Liderler yerel seçim için yoğun mesai harcadı’ [Leaders engaged in a packed schedule], 28 March. available online at: https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2019/03/29/liderler-yerel-secim-icin-yogun-mesai-harcadi
- Sayarı, S. (2014) ‘Interdisciplinary approaches to political clientelism and patronage in Turkey’, Turkish Studies, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 655–670.
- Sayarı, S. (2016) ‘Back to a predominant party system: the November 2015 snap election in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–280.
- T24. (2018) ‘İYİ Parti’nin ‘Millet İttifakı sona erdi’ açıklamasına CHP’den ilk yorum’ [CHP’s comments on İYİ Party’s decision to end the alliance], 4 July. available online at: https://t24.com.tr/haber/İYİ-partinin-millet-ittifaki-sona-erdi-aciklamasina-chpden-ilk-yorum,667113
- T24. (2019) ‘Erdoğan: Öcalan ve Demirtaş arasında iktidar savaşı var’ [Erdoğan: There is a tug of war between Öcalan and Demirtaş], 20 June. available online at: https://t24.com.tr/haber/erdogan-ocalan-ve-demirtas-arasinda-iktidar-savasi-var,826988
- Takvim. (2019) ‘50 günde 102 miting yapan Erdoğan, kapanışı İstanbul’da yaptı’ [Erdoğan, who held 102 rallies in 50 days, ends his campaign in Istanbul], 30 March. available online at: https://www.takvim.com.tr/guncel/2019/03/30/50-gunde-102-miting-yapan-Erdogan-kapanisi-istanbulda-yapti
- Toprak, B. (1990) ‘Religion as state ideology in a secular setting: the Turkish‐Islamic synthesis’, in Aspects of Religion in Secular Turkey, ed. M. Wagstaff, University of Durham, Occasional Paper Series, no.40, pp. 10–15.
- Tuğal, C. (2016) ‘In Turkey, the regime slides from soft to hard totalitarianism’, Open Democracy, 17 February. available online at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/turkey-hard-totalitarianism-erdogan-authoritarian/
- Yeni Şafak. (2019) ‘İşsizlik rakamları açıklandı’ [Unemployment figures released], 17 June. available online at: https://www.yenisafak.com/ekonomi/issizlik-rakamlari-aciklandi–mart-2019-issizlik-verileri-3495153
- Yeniçağ. (2018) ‘Millet ittifakı sona erdi’ [Nation’s alliance ends], available online at: https://www.yenicaggazetesi.com.tr/millet-ittifaki-sona-erdi-197453h.htm
- Yeniçağ. (2019) ‘Iğdır’ı HDP’ye teslim etmemek için aday göstermiyoruz’ [We don’t want the HDP to take Iğdır, so we don’t have a nominee], 4 July. available online at: https://www.yenicaggazetesi.com.tr/igdiri-hdpye-teslim-etmemek-icin-aday-gostermiyoruz-222002h.htm
- Yörük, E. (2012) ‘Welfare provision as political containment: the politics of social assistance and the Kurdish conflict in Turkey’, Politics & Society, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 517–547.
- YSK. (2019) ‘Election results’, available online at: https://sonuc.ysk.gov.tr/sorgu