3,475
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

Polarisation in Southern Europe: Elites, Party Conflicts and Negative Partisanship

References

  • Abramowitz, A. I. & Saunders, K. L. (2008) ‘Is polarization a myth?’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 542–555.
  • Andreadis, I. & Stavrakakis, Y. (2019) ‘Dynamics of polarization in the Greek case’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 157–172.
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S. (2019) ‘The Islamist-secularist divide and Turkey’s descent into severe polarization’, in Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization, eds T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 17–37.
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S. & Balta, E. (2019) ‘When elites polarize over polarization: framing the polarization debate in Turkey,’ New Perspectives on Turkey, vol. 60, pp. 153–176.
  • Bischof, D. & Wagner, M. (2019) ‘Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 888–904.
  • Bordignon, F. (2020) ‘Leader polarisation: conflict and change in the Italian political system’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3-4., pp. 285–315.
  • Bosco, A. (2001) ‘Four actors in search of a role: the Southern European communist parties’, in Parties, Politics and Democracy in the New Southern Europe, eds P. N. Diamandouros & R. Gunther, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, pp. 329–387.
  • Bosco, A. (2018) Le quattro crisi della Spagna, il Mulino, Bologna.
  • Bosco, A. & McDonnell, D. (2012) ‘Introduction: the Monti government and the downgrade of Italian parties’, in Italian Politics: From Berlusconi to Monti, eds A. Bosco & D. McDonnell, Berghahn, New York and Oxford, pp. 37–56.
  • Bosco, A. & Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (eds) (2009) La España de Zapatero. Años de cambios, 20042008, Editorial Pablo Iglesias, Madrid.
  • Bosco, A. & Verney, S. (2016) ‘From electoral epidemic to government epidemic: the next level of the crisis in Southern Europe’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 383–406.
  • Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. M. (2020) ‘Cross-country trends in affective polarization’, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. 26669, available online at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w26669
  • Bruneau, T. C., Diamandouros, P. N., Gunther, R., Lijphart, A., Morlino, L. & Brooks, R. A. (2001) ‘Democracy, Southern European style’, in Parties, Politics and Democracy in the New Southern Europe, eds P. N. Diamandouros & R. Gunther, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, pp. 16–82.
  • Campbell, J. E. (2016) Polarized. Making Sense of a Divided America, Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford.
  • Carothers, T. & O’Donohue, A. (eds) (2019) Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  • Castanho Silva, B. (2018) ‘Populist radical right parties and mass polarization in the Netherlands’, European Political Science Review, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 219–244.
  • Chiaramonte, A., Emanuele, V., Maggini, N. & Paparo, A. (2018) ‘Populist success in a hung parliament: the 2018 general election in Italy’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 479–501.
  • Conti, N., Pedrazzani, A. & Russo, F. (2020) ‘Policy polarisation in Italy: the short and conflictual life of the “government of change” (2018–2019)’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3-4., pp. 317–350.
  • Cotta, M. & Verzichelli, L. (2007) Political Institutions in Italy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Dallara, C. (2015) ‘Powerful resistance against a long running personal crusade: the impact of Silvio Berlusconi on the Italian judicial system’, Modern Italy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 59–76.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2008) ‘The quantity and the quality of party systems’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 899–920.
  • De Giorgi, E. & Santana-Pereira, J. (2020) ‘The exceptional case of post-bailout Portugal: a comparative outlook’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 127–150.
  • Donovan, M. (2008) ‘The center-right: conflict, unity, and permanent mobilization’, in Italian Politics: Frustrated Aspirations for Change, eds M. Donovan & P. Onofri, Berghahn, New York and Oxford, pp. 68–85.
  • Donovan, M. (2015) ‘Berlusconi’s impact and legacy: political parties and the party system’, Modern Italy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 11–24.
  • Druckman, J. N. & Levendusky, M. (2019) ‘What do we measure when we measure affective polarization?’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 114–122.
  • Fiorina, M. P. (2017) Unstable Majorities: Polarization, Party Sorting, and Political Stalemate, Hoover Press, Stanford.
  • Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J. & Pope, J. C. (2006) Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, 2nd, Pearson Longman, New York.
  • Freire, A. (2006) Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia. Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparada, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, Lisboa.
  • Fundación Alternativas (2007) Informe sobre la democracia en España 2007. La estrategia de la crispación, Fundación Alternativas, Madrid.
  • Gerring, J. (2012) ‘Mere description’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 721–746.
  • Gidron, N., Adams, J. & Horne, W. (2020) American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Gunther, R. & Montero, J. R. (2012) ‘From consensus transition to adversary democracy’, in Democràcia, Política I Societat, eds J. Jordana, V. Navarro, F. Pallarés & F. Requejo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, pp. 101–135.
  • Harteveld, E. (2019) ‘Affective polarization and social sorting: a comparative study’, Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, Washington.
  • Hetherington, M. J. (2009) ‘Review article: putting polarization in perspective’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 413–448.
  • Hübscher, E., Sattler, T. & Wagner, M. (2020) ‘Does austerity cause polarization?’, SSRN working paper, available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3541546
  • Hutter, S. & Kriesi, H. (eds) (2019) European Party Politics in Times of Crisis, Cambridge University Press., Cambridge
  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. (2019) ‘The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 129–146.
  • Iyengar, S., Sood, G. & Lelkes, Y. (2012) ‘Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 405–431.
  • Lanza, O. & Memoli, V. (2017) ‘La polarizzazione quarant’anni dopo Parties and Party Systems: tra vecchi e nuovi interrogativi’, Quaderni di Scienza Politica, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 183–221.
  • Lauka, A., McCoy, J. & Firat, R. B. (2018) ‘Mass partisan polarization: measuring a relational concept’, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107–126.
  • Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M. & Horowitz, J. M. (2006) ‘Party polarization in American politics: characteristics, causes, and consequences’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 83–110.
  • Lupu, N. (2015) ‘Party polarization and mass partisanship: a comparative perspective’, Political Behavior, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 331–356.
  • Lyrintzis, C. (2005) ‘The changing party system: stable democracy, contested “modernisation”’, West European Politics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 242–259.
  • Maravall, J. M. (2008) La confrontación política, Taurus, Madrid.
  • Massari, O. & Sartori, G. (2010) ‘Giovanni Sartori intervistato da Oreste Massari’, Il Mulino, no. 2, pp. 301–325.
  • Mavrogordatos, G. T. (1984) ‘The Greek party system: a case of ‘limited but polarised pluralism’?’, West European Politics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 156–169.
  • McCarty, N. (2019) Polarization. What Everyone Needs to Know®, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • McCoy, J., Rahman, T. & Somer, M. (2018) ‘Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities’’, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 16–42.
  • McCoy, J. & Somer, M. eds (2018) ‘Polarization and democracy: a Janus-faced relationship with pernicious consequences’, Special issue of American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 1–145.
  • McCoy, J. & Somer, M. (eds) (2019a) ‘Polarizing polities: a global threat to democracy’, Special issue of The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, pp. 1–271.
  • McCoy, J. & Somer, M. (2019b) ‘Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: comparative evidence and possible remedies’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 234–271.
  • Morlino, L. (2020) Equality, Freedom and Democracy. Europe after the Great Recession, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Morlino, L. & Raniolo, F. (2017) The Impact of the Economic Crisis on South European Democracies, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • Nicolacopoulos, I. (2005) ‘Elections and voters, 1974–2004: old cleavages and new issues’, West European Politics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 260–278.
  • Orriols, L. & León, S. (2020) ‘Looking for affective polarisation in Spain: PSOE and Podemos from conflict to coalition’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4., pp. 351–379.
  • Pappas, T. S. (2003) ‘The transformation of the Greek party system since 1951’, West European Politics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 90–114.
  • Pridham, G. & Verney, S. (1991) ‘The coalitions of 1989–90 in Greece: inter‐party relations and democratic consolidation’, West European Politics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 42–69.
  • Reiljan, A. (2020) ‘“Fears and loathing across party lines” (also) in Europe: affective polarisation in European party systems’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 376–396.
  • Reiljan, A. & Ryan, A. (2021) ‘Ideological tripolarization, partisan tribalism and institutional trust: the foundations of affective polarization in the Swedish multiparty system’, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 195–219.
  • Rodríguez-Teruel, J. (2020) ‘Polarisation and electoral realignment: the case of the right-wing parties in Spain’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4., pp. 381–411.
  • Rogowski, J. C. & Sutherland, J. L. (2016) ‘How ideology fuels affective polarization’, Political Behavior, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 485–508.
  • Sani, G. & Sartori, G. (1983) ‘Polarization, fragmentation and competition in Western democracies’, in Western European Party Systems. Continuity and Change, eds H. Daalder & P. Mair, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp. 307–340.
  • Sartori, G. (1982) Teoria dei Partiti e Caso Italiano, Sugarco, Milano.
  • Sartori, G. (2005, or. ed. 1976) Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis, ECPR Press, Colchester.
  • Schmitt, H. & Freire, A. (2012) ‘Ideological polarization: different worlds in East and West’, in Citizens and the European Polity. Mass Attitudes Towards the European and National Polities, eds D. Sanders, P. Magalhāes & G. Tóka, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 65–87.
  • Simón, P. (2020a) ‘Two-bloc logic, polarisation and coalition government: the november 2019 general election in Spain’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4., pp. 535–565.
  • Simón, P. (2020b) ‘‘The multiple Spanish elections of April and May 2019: the impact of the territorial and left-right polarisation’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4., pp. 443–476.
  • Skoulariki, A. (2020) ‘Political polarisation in Greece: the Prespa agreement, left/right antagonism and the nationalism/populism nexus’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4., pp. 413–441.
  • Somer, M. (2019) ‘Turkey: the slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 681, no. 1, pp. 42–61.
  • Svolik, M. W. (2019) ‘Polarization versus democracy’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 20–32.
  • Tronconi, F. & Valbruzzi, M. (2020) ‘Populism put to the polarisation test: the 2019–20 election cycle in Italy’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4., pp. 477–503.
  • Tsatsanis, E. (2018) ‘The swift unravelling: party system change and de-institutionalization in Greece during the crisis’, in Party System Change, the European Crisis and the State of Democracy, ed. M. Lisi, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 505–534.
  • Tsatsanis, E., Teperoglou, E. & Seriatos, A. (2020) ‘Two-partyism reloaded: polarisation, negative partisanship and the return of the left-right divide in the Greek elections of 2019’, South European Society & Politics, vol. 25, no. 3–4, pp. 535–565.
  • Verney, S., Bosco, A. & Aydın-Düzgit, S. (eds) (2019) The AKP since Gezi Park. Moving to Regime Change in Turkey, Routledge, London and New York.
  • Wagner, M. (2021) ‘Affective polarization in multiparty systems’, Electoral Studies., vol. 69, 102199.
  • Webster, S. W. & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017) ‘The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the U.S. electorate’, American Politics Research, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 621–647.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.