Democratic Backsliding, Conflict, and Partisan Mobilisation of Ethnic Groups: Local Government Control and Electoral Participation in Turkey

References

• Ahuja, A. (2019) Mobilizing the Marginalized: Ethnic Parties without Ethnic Movements, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Akgül, M. & Görgün Akgül, Ç. (2022) ‘Beyond mutually hurting stalemate: why did the peace process in Turkey (2009–2015) fail?’, Turkish Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akser, M. (2018) ‘News media consolidation and censorship in Turkey: From liberal ideals to corporatist realities’, Mediterranean Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 78–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlJazeera. (2015) ‘DTK’dan ‘öz yönetim’ deklarasyonu [DTK declares ‘self-rule’]’, available online at: https://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/dtkdan-oz-yonetim-deklarasyonu
   Google Scholar
• Arı, E., Bayer, R. & Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (forthcoming) ‘Breaking the bank: Effects of domestic conflict on the banking sector in Turkey’, Terror and Political Violence. doi:10.1080/09546553.2023.2252104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arı, E., Bayer, R., Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. & Kural, E. (2022) ‘Avoiding fallout from terrorist attacks: The role of local politics and governments’, Journal of Peace Research, pp. 002234332211267. doi:10.1177/00223433221126715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arıkan Akdag, G. (2015) Ethnicity and Elections in Turkey: Party Politics and the Mobilization of Swing Voters, Routledge, Abingdon.
   Google Scholar
• Arriola, L., Dow, D., Matanock, A. & Mattes, M. (2021) ‘Policing institutions and post-conflict peace’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 65, no. 10, 1738–1763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, E. & Çarkoğlu, A. (2021) ‘Terror attacks, issue salience, and party competence: Diagnosing shifting vote preferences in a panel study’, Party Politics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 755–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakke, K. & Wibbels, E. (2006) ‘Diversity, disparity, and civil conflict in federal states’, World Politics, vol. 59, no. 1, 1–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcells, L. & Torrats-Espinosa, G. (2018) ‘Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks’, PNAS, vol. 115, no. 42, 10624–10629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baysal, N. (2017) ‘Kayyum, kadınlar ve 8 mart’ [Trustees, women and 8 March], T24’, available online at: https://t24.com.tr/yazarlar/nurcan-baysal/kayyum-kadinlar-ve-8-mart,16727
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Bassat, A. & Dahan, M. (2018) ‘Biased policy and political behavior: The case of uneven removal of elected mayors in Israel’, Politics & Policy, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 912–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianet. (2009) ‘Minister Atalay: “We will speak to anyone for a solution”’, available online at: https://bianet.org/biamag/minorities/116164-minister-atalay-we-will-speak-to-anyone-for-a-solution
   Google Scholar
• Bianet. (2015) ‘Demokratik toplum kongresi’nden “demokratik Özerk Bölgeler” Kararı’ [democratic Society Congress’s “democratic Autonomous regions” decision]’, available online at: https://bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/170559-demokratik-toplum-kongresi-nden-demokratik-ozerk-bolgeler-karari
   Google Scholar
• Blair, H. (2000) ‘Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries’, World Development, vol. 28, no. 1, 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozarslan, H. (1996) ‘Turkey’s elections and Kurds’, Middle East Report, vol. 199, pp. 16–19. doi:10.2307/3012886
   Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. (2006) ‘Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism?’, International Organization, vol. 60, no. 3, 651–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casier, M., Jongerden, J. & Walker, N. (2011) ‘Fruitless attempts? The Kurdish Initiative and containment of the Kurdish movement in Turkey’, New Perspectives on Turkey, vol. 44, pp. 103–127.
   Google Scholar
• Cederman, L., Hug, S., Schadel, A. & Wucherpfennig, J. (2015) ‘Territorial autonomy in the shadow of conflict: Too little, too late?’, American Political Science Review, vol. 109, no. 2, 354–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik, A. B. (2021) ‘Inclusive citizenship and societal reconciliation within Turkey’s Kurdish issue’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, 313 332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, P. (2018) ‘One nation, many worlds: Varieties of developmental regimes in India’, SSRN Electronic Journal, available online at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3492136
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, K. (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Christia, F. (2019) ‘Decentralization in post-conflict settings: assessing community-driven development in the wake of violence’, in Decentralized Governance and Accountability, eds J. Rodden & E. Wibbels, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 205–228.
   Google Scholar
• Cortright, D., Seyle, C. & Wall, K. (2017) Governance for Peace: How Inclusive, Participatory and Accountable Institutions Promote Peace and Prosperity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Cumhuriyet. (2010) ‘“AKP hükümeti başarısız”’[“AKP government is unsuccessful”]’, available online at: https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/akp-hukumeti-basarisiz-113140
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, S. (1999) ‘Cumhurbaşkanı Süleyman Demirel’in, 21’inci Dönem 2’nci Yasama Yılını açış konuşması’ [President Suleyman Demirel’s Opening Speech of the 21st Session Second Legislative Year]’, available online at: https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanak/donem21/yil2/bas/b001m.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, H. (2019) ‘Is hope more precious than victory? The failed peace process and urban warfare in the Kurdish region of Turkey’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 118, no. 1, 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B. & Gumuscu, Ş. (2016) ‘Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 9, 1581–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B. & Gümüşçü, Ş. (2017) ‘A small yes for presidentialism: The Turkish constitutional referendum of April 2017’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 22, no. 3, 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B. & Gümüşçü, Ş. (2023) ‘How Erdoğan’s populism won again’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 34, no. 3, 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieldhouse, E. & Cutts, D. (2008) ‘Diversity, density and turnout: The effect of neighbourhood ethno-religious composition on voter turnout in Britain’, Political Geography, vol. 27, no. 5, 530–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans-Morse, J., Mazzuca, S. & Nichter, S. (2014) ‘Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, no. 2, 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunes, C. (2020) ‘The Transformation of Turkey’s pro-Kurdish democratic movement’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 746–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, M. (2020) ‘The evolving Kurdish question in Turkey’, Middle East Critique, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, M., Balta, E. & Çelik, A. (2021) ‘War and peace in the age of corona: an analysis of support for repressive state policies in divided societies’, Turkish Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, 177–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, M. & Mason, T. (2022) ‘Civil war outcomes and egalitarian democracy in post-civil war states: A cross-national analysis, 1946-2018’, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 34, no. 4, 437–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, M. & Rost, N. (2013) ‘Sustaining the peace after ethnic civil wars’, Conflict Management and Peace Science’, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 469–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzeldere, E. (2009) ‘Turkey: Regional elections and the Kurdish question’, Caucasian Review of International Affairs, vol. 3, no. 3, 291–306.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, W. (2003) ‘Human rights, the European Union and the Turkish accession process’, Turkish Studies, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzell, C. & Hoddie, M. (2020) Power Sharing and Democracy in Post-Civil War States: The Art of the Possible, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict, University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, J. (2012) ‘Measuring ethnic voting: Do proportional electoral laws politicize ethnicity?’, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 56, no. 4, 986–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R. & Sprague, J. (1992) ‘Political parties and electoral mobilization: Political structure, social structure, and the party canvass’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 86, no. 1, 70–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Economics & Peace. (2016) ‘Global Terrorism Index 2016’, available online at: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-terrorism-index-2016
   Google Scholar
• Interior Ministry of Turkey. (2017) ‘Appointments to municipalities due to terror’, available online at: https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/kurumlar/icisleri.gov.tr/IcSite/strateji/deneme/YAYINLAR/%C4%B0%C3%87ER%C4%B0K/belediyeler%20redakteSON.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. (2017) Managing Turkey’s PKK Conflict: The Case of Nusaybin, International Crisis Group, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Just, A. (2017) ‘Race, ethnicity, and political behavior’, in The Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Politics, ed. W. Thompson, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kamer, H. (2018) ‘HEP’ten HDP’ye 30 yılda neler yaşandı’, BBC Türkçe, 11 February, available online at: https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-43019313.
   Google Scholar
• Karakaş, İ. (2022) ‘OHAL Komisyonu başvurulardan yaklaşık yüzde 98‘ini karara bağladı’ [OHAL Commision decides on close to 98 percent of applications], AA’, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/gundem/ohal-komisyonu-basvurulardan-yaklasik-yuzde-98ini-karara-bagladi/2598876
   Google Scholar
• Karakoc, E. & Ozen, H. (2021) ‘Kurdish public opinion in Turkey: cultural and political demands of the “Kurdish street’, in Kurds and Yezidis in the Middle East, eds M. Tezcür & I. B. Tauris, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp. 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, J., Banducci, S. & Bowler, S. (2008) ‘Getting out the vote: Party mobilization in a comparative perspective’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 38, no. 1, 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Z. & Whiting, M. (2019) ‘The HDP, the AKP and the battle for Turkish democracy’, Ethnopolitics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, S. & Anderson, P. (2018) ‘Decentralization as a tool for conflict resolution’, in Handbook of Territorial Politics, eds E. Hepburn, K. Detterbeck & E. E. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (2012) Agents or Bosses Patronage and Intra-Party Politics in Argentina and Turkey, ECPR Press, Colchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (2015) ‘Winds of change? The June 2015 parliamentary election in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 20, no. 4, 445–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemahlıoğlu, Ö. (2022) ‘Distributive politics and electoral competition for the Kurdish vote’, Turkish Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kıbrıs, A. (2021) ‘The geo-temporal evolution of violence in civil conflicts’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 58, no. 5, 885–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramon, E. (2019) ‘Ethnic group institutions and electoral clientelism’, Party Politics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 435–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larreguy, H., Marshall, J. & Querubin, P. (2016) ‘Parties, brokers, and voter mobilization: How turnout buying depends upon the party’s capacity to monitor brokers’, American Political Science Review, vol. 110, no. 1, 160–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez i Coma, F. & Morgenbesser, L. (2020) ‘Election turnout in authoritarian regimes’, Electoral Studies, vol. 68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2007) ‘Confronting terrorisms: Group motivation and successful state policies’, Terrorism and Political Violence, vol. 19, no. 3, 331–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milliyet. (2009) ‘“Açılım” politikasına destek düştü’, [Support for ‘Opening’ Policy Fell], 26 August, available online at: https://www.milliyet.com.tr/siyaset/acilim-politikasina-destek-dustu-1132247
   Google Scholar
• Mookherjee, D. (2015) ‘Political decentralization’, Annual Review of Economics, vol. 7, no. 1, 231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2004) Electoral Engineering Voting Rules and Political Behavior, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Oskooii, K. A. R. (2020) ‘Perceived discrimination and political behavior’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, no. 3, 867–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. (2015) ‘Turkey’s judiciary and the drift toward competitive authoritarianism’, The International Spectator, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özel, I. & Yıldırım, K. (2019) ‘Political consequences of welfare regimes: Social assistance and support for presidentialism in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 24, no. 4, 485–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panov, P. & Ross, C. (2016) ‘Explanatory factors for electoral turnout in the Russian Federation: The regional dimension’, Demokratizatsiya; the Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, vol. 24, no. 3, 351–370.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. & Robertson, G. (2012) ‘Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Russian gubernatorial appointments’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 74, no. 4, 1023–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J., Hunter, L. & Murray, G. (2013) ‘Voters versus terrorists: Analyzing the effect of terrorist events on voter turnout’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 50, no. 4, 495–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, S. & Hansen, J. (1993) Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America, MacMillan, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sadanandan, A. (2012) ‘Patronage and decentralization: The politics of poverty in India’, Comparative Politics, vol. 44, no. 2, 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saikkonen, I. (2017) ‘Electoral mobilization and authoritarian elections: Evidence from post-Soviet Russia’, Government and Opposition, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 51–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez, F. & Del Mar Palau, M. (2006) ‘Conflict, decentralisation and local governance in Colombia, 1974-2004’, DOCUMENTO CEDE 2006-20 ISSN 1657-7191, CEDE, Bogota, Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, D., Fisher, S. D., Heath, A. & Sobolewska, M. (2014) ‘The democratic engagement of Britain’s ethnic minorities’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, 120–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandovici, M. & Listhaug, O. (2010) ‘Ethnic and linguistic minorities and political participation in Europe’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol. 51, no. 1–2, 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarigil, Z. (2010) ‘Curbing Kurdish ethno-nationalism in Turkey: An empirical assessment of pro-Islamic and socio-economic approaches’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 33, no. 3, 533–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satana, N. S. (2012) ‘The Kurdish issue in June 2011 elections: Continuity or change in Turkey’s democratization?’, Turkish Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaşkan, O. (2021) ‘Political dynamics of local government reform in a development context: The case of Turkey’, Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 204–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayarı, S. (2016) ‘Back to a predominant party system: The November 2015 snap election in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sells, C. (2020) ‘Building parties from City Hall: Party membership and municipal government in Brazil’, The Journal of Politics, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 1576–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, K. & Van Ham, C. (2013) ‘The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout’, Electoral Studies, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 344–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, M. (2014) Milada Dönüş: Türk-Kürt Sorunu ve Siyaset ve Fikirler İmparatorlukları, Ulusları ve Devletleri Nasıl Yeniden İnşa Eder [Return to Point Zero: The Turkish-Kurdish Question and How Politics and Ideas (Re-)Make Empires, Nations and States], Istanbul, Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları [Koç University Press].
   Google Scholar
• Sözen, Y. (2019) ‘Competition in a populist authoritarian regime: The June 2018 dual elections in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, vol. 24, no. 3, 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, A. & Schubiger, L. (2018) ‘Democracy and civil war: The case of Colombia’, Conflict Management and Peace Science’, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 587–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szwarcberg, M. (2015) Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• T24. (2015) ‘Öz yönetim ilan edilen merkez sayısı 16‘ya yükseldi [Number of centres declaring self-government rose to 16]’, 20 August, available online at: https://t24.com.tr/haber/oz-yonetim-ilan-edilen-merkez-sayisi-16ya-yukseldi,306949
   Google Scholar
• Tezcür, G. (2014). ‘The ebb and flow of armed conflict in Turkey: an elusive peace’, in Conflict, Democratization, and the Kurds in the Middle East, eds D. Romano & M. Gürses, Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, pp. 171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcür, G. (2015) ‘Electoral behavior in civil wars: The Kurdish conflict in Turkey’, Civil Wars, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 70–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutkal, S. (2022) ‘Trustees instead of elected mayors: Authoritarian neoliberalism and the removal of Kurdish mayors in Turkey’, Nationalities Papers, vol. 50, no. 6, 1164–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uysal, C. (2022) ‘Power politics v. The rule of law in Turkey’, in The Rule of Law in Retreat: Challenges to Justice in the United Nations World, ed. S. Redo, Rowman and Littlefield, Lexington Books, Lanham, pp. 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyck, B. (2014) ‘Why party organization still matters: The workers’ party in Northeastern Brazil’, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 56, no. 2, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, N. (2010) Activists in Office: Kurdish Politics and Protest in Turkey, University of Washington Press, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• White, A. (2022) ‘A chink in the autocrat’s armour: Demographic change and voter turnout in Putin’s Russia’, Ethnopolitics, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiting, M. & Kaya, Z. (2021) ‘Autocratization, permanent emergency rule and local politics: Lessons from the Kurds in Turkey’, Democratization, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 821–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yörük, E. (2012) ‘Welfare provision as political containment: The politics of social assistance and the Kurdish conflict in Turkey’, Politics & Society, vol. 40, no. 4, 517–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yörük, E. (2018) ‘The radical democracy of the People’s democratic party: transforming the Turkish state’, in From the Streets to the State, Changing the World by Taking Power, ed. P.C. Gray, SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• YSK (Supreme Election Council). (n.d.) ‘29/03/2009 Genel Mahalli İdareler Seçim Sonucu’, available online at: https://www.ysk.gov.tr/doc/dosyalar/docs/2009MahalliIdareler/ResmiGazete/BelediyeBaskanligi.pdf
   Google Scholar