Tutoring during the pandemic: mentoring tutors’ formative experiences using digital and digital multimodal texts

References

• Atkinson, T. C., & Colby, S. A. (2006). Who’s teaching, who’s learning? Analyzing the professional growth of graduate student tutors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 14(2), 227–245. doi:10.1080/13611260500493642
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aurini, J., & Davies, S. (2021). COVID-19 school closures and educational achievement gaps in Canada: Lessons from Ontario summer learning research. Canadian Review of Sociology, 58(2), 165–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12334
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun, B., & Clarke, V. (2020). Online qualitative surveys?!? International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://internationaljournalofsocialresearchmethodology.wordpress.com/2020/08/19/online-qualitative-surveys/
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. doi:10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., Pulled, S. M., Maki, K. E., Kanive, R., Hodgson, J., Helman, L. A. … Preast, J. L. (2015). Accuracy of student performance while reading leveled books rated at their instructional level by a reading inventory. Journal of School Psychology, 53(6), 437–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check, J., & Schutt, R. (2012). Survey research. In J. Check & R. Schutt (Eds.), Research methods in education (pp. 251–305). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ciampa, K., & Gallagher, T. L. (2021). The development and validation of the teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for literacy instruction in the 21st century scale: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, A. -P. (2020). Healing the digital divide during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 21(1), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, J. (2016). Differentiated reading instruction: Strategies and technology tools to help all students improve (1st ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315630649
   Google Scholar
• De Man, J., Campbell, L., Tabana, H., & Wouters, E. (2021). The pandemic of online research in times of COVID-19. BMJ Open, 11(2), e043866. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, M. (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17), 17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T. L., Woloshyn, V. E., & Elliott, E. (2009). Exploring the salient experiences of teacher candidates who were former volunteer tutors. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(2), 129–146. doi:10.1080/13611260902860075
   Google Scholar
• Gray, E. S., & Myers, J. (2018). Two types of coaching styles: Graduate and undergraduate students collaborate in a university reading clinic. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 26(3), 249–266. doi:10.1080/13611267.2018.1511947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverback, H. R. (2009). Situating pre-service reading teachers as tutors: Implications of teacher self-efficacy on tutoring elementary students. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(3), 251–261. doi:10.1080/13611260903050171
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. W., Warren, K., Whitmore, K. F., Flint, A. S., Laman, T. T., & Jaggers, W. (2020). Take a close look: Inventorying your classroom library for diverse books. The Reading Teacher, 73(6), 747–755. doi:10.1002/trtr.1886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, E., Molfese, V. J., & Larson, A. E. (2011). More than good intentioned help: Volunteer tutoring and elementary readers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(3), 277–299. doi:10.1080/13611267.2011.597119
   Google Scholar
• Katzir, T., Hershko, S., & Halamish, V. (2013). The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: Bigger is not always better. Plos One, 8(9), 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynar, N., Sadik, O., & Boichuk, E. (2020). Technology in early childhood education: Electronic books for improving students’ literacy skills. TechTrends, 64(6), 911–921. doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00520-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. D., & Lewis, J. (2011). Learning from the “little guys”: What do middle and high school preservice teachers learn from tutoring elementary students? Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(2), 120–132. doi:10.1080/19388071003725705
   Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2017). Expert views on TPACK for early literacy: Priorities for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5). doi:10.14742/ajet.2502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, M., Veresov, N., & Clark, J. C. (2001). Guided reading - Working within a child’s zone of proximal development. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100530. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100530
   Google Scholar
• Nickel, J., & Chadwick, J. (2022). Tutoring to build teacher candidates’ competence as reading teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 30(3), 312–332. doi:10.1080/13611267.2022.2070990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish high school during the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369. doi:10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.167
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L., Norris, J., White, D., & Moules, N. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., Sargent, S., & Moreland, M. (2014). Evaluating the efficacy of using a digital reading environment to improve reading comprehension within a reading clinic. Reading Psychology, 35(5), 397–421. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.683236
   Google Scholar
• Parker, A. K., Zenkov, K., & Glaser, H. (2021). Preparing school-based teacher educators: Mentor teachers’ perceptions of mentoring and mentor training. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(1), 65–75. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2021.1877027
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. (2018). NVivo (Version 12). https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). doi:10.1787/6ae21003-en
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R., & Starmer, L. (2017). Building adaptive expertise: Professional learning that works with teachers, not on them. Australian Educational Leader, 39(4), 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, N., & King, J. (2020). Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–28. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1320570.pdf
   Google Scholar
• State of New South Wales [NSW] Department of Education. (2020, September 17). Digital and multimodal texts. New South Wales Government. Retrieved from https://education.nsw.gov.au/teaching-and-learning/curriculum/key-learning-areas/english/ES1S3/professional-learning/digital-and-multimodal-texts#tabs_12244762611
   Google Scholar
• State of Victoria Department of Education and Training [DET]. (2020, September 9). Literacy teaching toolkit: Overview of multimodal literacy. Australia: State Government of Victoria. Retrieved from https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/english/literacy/multimodal/Pages/multimodaloverview.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Trede, F., & Higgs, J. (2009). Framing research questions and writing philosophically: The role of framing research questions. In J. Higgs, D. Horsfall, & S. Grace (Eds.), Writing qualitative research on practice (pp. 13–25). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• van Ginkel, G., van Drie, J., & Verloop, N. (2018). Mentor teachers’ views of their mentees. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 26(2), 122–147. doi:10.1080/13611267.2018.1472542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nuland, S., Mandzuk, D., Petrick, K. T., & Cooper, T. (2020). COVID-19 and its effects on teacher education in Ontario: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 442–451. doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1803050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. C., Christ, T., & Mifsud, C. L. (2020). ‘iPad has everything!’: How young children with diverse linguistic backgrounds in Malta and the U.S. process multimodal digital text. Early Child Development and Care, 190(16), 2563–2580. doi:10.1080/03004430.2019.1593157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar