Action Research, Assessment, and Institutional Review Boards (IRB): Conflicting Demands or Productive Tension for the Academic Librarian?

REFERENCES

• ACRL. “Annual Report 2011–2012.” College & Research Libraries News 73.11 (2012): 671–709. Print.
   Google Scholar
• —. “Immersion Program.” (2014). . Web. 14 Jan. 2014. <http://www.ala.org/acrl/immersionprogram>.
   Google Scholar
• —. “Standards for Libraries in Higher Education.” (2011). . Web. 14 Jan. 2014. <http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/standardslibraries>.
   Google Scholar
• ACRL Research and Review Committee. “2012 Top Ten Trends in Academic Libraries.” College and Research Libraries News 73.6 (2012): 311–20. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Action Learning, Action Research Association (ALARA). “Action Research and Evaluation Online Course (Areol).” (2014). . Web. 14 Jan. 2014. <http://www.alarassociation.org/pages/education>.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell, Catherine, and Phil Johnson. “Action Research: Explaining the Diversity.” Human Relations 59.6 (2006): 783–814. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detardo-Bora, KimberlyA. “Action Research in a World of Positivist-oriented Review Boards.” Action Research 2.3 (2004): 237–53. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Eldredge, JonathanD. “The Evolution of Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, Part I: Defining EBLIP.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7.4 (2012): 139–45. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ewell, PeterT. “An Emerging Scholarship: A Brief History of Assessment.” Building a Scholarship of Assessment. Ed.Trudy W. Banta. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002: 3–25. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, David. “The Scholarship of Canadian Research University Librarians.” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 2.2 (2007): 1–25. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Grugel, Chris, and MadelineA. Copp. “Immersion ‘99: Reports from the Institute for Information Literacy Program.” College & Research Libraries News, 60.9 (1999): 723–28. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Hardesty, LarryL. “Future of Academic/Research Librarians: A Period of Transition – To What?” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2.1 (2002): 79–97. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard Graduate School of Education. “Leadership Institute for Academic Librarians.” (2014). . Web. 14 Jan. 2014. <http://www.gse.harvard.edu/ppe/pro-grams/higher-education/portfolio/leadership-academic-librarians.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, JanetSwan. “Constant Vigilance, Babelfish, and Foot Surgery: Perspectives on Faculty Status and Tenure for Academic Librarians.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 5.1 (2005): 7–22. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honey, ChristopherP., and JohnA. Baker. “Exploring the Impact of Journal Clubs: A Systematic Review.” Nurse Education Today. 31.8 (2011): 825–31. . Print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Research Design in Librarianship. “About IRDL.” (2014). . Web. 24 Mar. 2014. <http://irdlonline.org/>.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Museum and Library Services. “IMLS Library Services September 2013 Grant Announcement.” (2013). . Web. 24 Mar. 2014. <http://www.imls.gov/news/2013_ols_grant_announcement.aspx>.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, HeidiL. M., Selinda Berg, and Dayna Cornwall. “Something to Talk About: Re-Thinking Conversations on Research Culture in Canadian Academic Libraries.” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library & Information Practice & Research 5.2 (2010): 1–11. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Marie R., and Kristine R. Brancolini. “Academic Librarian Research: A Survey of Attitudes, Involvement, and Perceived Capabilities.” . College & Research Libraries 73.5 (2012): 431–448.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrillidou, Martha, and Colleen Cook. “The Evolution of Measurement and Evaluation of Libraries: A Perspective from the Association of Research Libraries.” Library Trends 56.4 (2008): 888–909. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labaree, RobertV. “Working Successfully with Your Institutional Review Board: Practical Advice for Academic Librarians.” College & Research Libraries News 71.4 (2010): 190–93. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Lamothe, AlainR. “The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing. 43.2 (2012): 156–67. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, YvonnaS., and WilliamG. Tierney. “Qualitative Research and Institutional Review Boards.” Qualitative Inquiry 10.2 (2004): 219–34. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, Jean, and Jack Whitehead. All You Need to Know About Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2011. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W.Bede, and Mary Reichel. “Publish or Perish: A Dilemma for Academic Librarians?” College & Research Libraries 60.3 (1999): 232–43. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanelli, DaleS., and PatriciaF. Stenstrom. “The Benefits of Research for Academic Librarians and the Institutions They Serve.” College & Research Libraries 47.5 (1986): 482–85. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New England Resource Center for Higher Education. “Participatory Action Research (PAR): An Epistemology to Examine Purposes of Education.” (2014). . Web. 14 Jan. 2014. <http://nerche.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1376>.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, GayHelen, and AmyJ. Slowik. “The Value of Research in Academic Libraries.” College & Research Libraries 74.2 (2013): 143–57. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabha, Chandra, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Lawrence Olszewski, and LillieR. Jenkins. “What is Enough? Satisficing Information Needs.” Journal of Documentation 63.1 (2007): 74–89. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, KathlinL. “The Postmodern Library in an Age of Assessment.” ACRL Tenth National Conference. Denver, CO. . 1518 March 2001. . <http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/pdf/kray.pdf.>
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, John. “Research Ethics.” International Journal of Psychotherapy 2.5 (2000): 103–112. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders III, JamesH., and Christine Ballengee-Morris. “Troubling the IRB: Institutional Review Boards’ Impact on Art Educators Conducting Social Science Research Involving Human Subjects.” Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research 49.4 (2008): 311–27. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, DonaldA. “Knowing-in-Action: The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology.” Change 27.6 (1995): 26–34. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Smale, MauraA. “Demystifying the IRB: Human Subjects Research in Academic Libraries.” portal: Libraries and the Academy 10.3 (2010): 309–21. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, ErnestT. Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Suskie, LindaA. Assessing Student Learning: A Common Sense Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009. . Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vega, RobertD., and RuthS. Connell. “Librarians’ Attitudes Toward Conferences: A Study.” College & Research Libraries 68.6 (2007): 503–16. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, AndreaA., Maureen Kelly, and Janet Webster. “Assessing Library Scholarship: Experience At A Land Grant University.” College & Research Libraries 71.6 (2010): 510–24. . Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinskie, Cordelia, and Judi Repman. “Getting Ready to Turn Your Everyday Work into Meaningful Inquiry: Foundational Literature in Qualitative and Action Research.” Using Qualitative Methods in Action Research: How Librarians Can Get to the Why of Data. Ed.Douglas Cook and Leslie Farmer. Chicago: American Library Association, 2011. 25–32. . Print.
   Google Scholar