User Impact on Selection, Digitization, and the Development of Digital Special Collections

REFERENCES

• Ayris, Paul. Guidance for Selecting Materials for Digitisation. Joint RLG and NPO Preservation Conference, University of Warwick. London: Research Libraries Group and National Preservation Office, 1998. Web. 12 Sept. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bantin, James, and Leah Agne. “Digitizing for Value: A User-Based Strategy for University Archives.” Journal of Archival Organization 8 (2010): 244–50. Taylor & Francis Online. Web. 12 Sept. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bülow, AnnaE., and Jess Ahmon. Preparing Collections for Digitization. London: Facet Publishing, 2011. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council of Archives Preservation Committee. Digitization and Archives. Ottawa: Canadian Council of Archives, 2002. Web. 11 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Erway, Ricky, and Jennifer Schaffner. Shifting Gears: Gearing Up to Get into the Flow. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Programs and Research, 2007. Web. 21 Dec. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gertz, Janet. “Preservation and Selection for Digitization.” NEDCC Preservation Leaflet 6.6: Reformatting. Andover, MA: Northeast Document Conservation Centre, n.d. Web. 12 Sept. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gertz, Janet. Selecting Rare Books and Special Collections for Digitization. New York, NY: Columbia University Academic Commons, 2013. Web. 1 Sept 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gstrein, Silvia, and Günter Mühlberger. “User-driven Content Selection for Digitisation–The eBook on Demand Network.” Cultural Heritage On Line. Empowering Users: An Active Role for User Communities, International Conference Florence 15th–16th December 2009, Ed. Chiara CirinnaMaurizio Lunghi. Italy: Fondazione Rinascimento Digitale, 2009. . Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Valerie. “How can I Help You? Becoming User-Centered in Special Collections.” Archival Issues 32.2 (2010): 71–97. JSTOR. Web. 3 June 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, HelenP., ed. Audiovisual Archives: A Practical Reader. Paris: UNESCO, General Information Programme and UNISIST, 1997. . Web. 1 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hazen, Dan, Jeffrey Horrell, and Jan Merrill-Oldham. Selecting Research Collections for Digitization. Washington, DC: Council of Library and Information Resources, 1998. N. pag. Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, LornaM. Digitizing Collections: Strategic Issues for the Information Manager. London: Facet Publishing, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions Rare Books and Manuscript Section (IFLA). Guidelines for planning the Digitization of Rare Books and Manuscript Collections. Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 2014. Web. 24 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, AnneR., and OyaY. Rieger, eds. Moving Theory into Practice: Digital Imaging for Libraries and Archives. California: Research Libraries Group, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, Ted. “Why the Archives Introduced Digitisation on Demand.” RLG DigiNews 6.4 (2002): n. pag. Web. 21 Oct. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, Ted, and Anne McLean. “Taking it to the People: Why the National Archives of Australia Embraced Digitisation on Demand.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 35.1 (2004): 2–15. Web. 21 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, LarisaK. “All Text Considered: A Perspective on Mass Digitizing and Archival Processing.” The American Archivist 76.2 (2013): 521–40. Freely Accessible Arts & Humanities Journals. Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• National Archives and Records Administration. Strategy for Digitizing Archival Materials for Public Access, 2015–2024. Washington, DC: The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, December 2014. Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Gillian. “The Digital Archive.” Evaluating and Measuring the Value, Use and Impact of Digital Collections, Ed. LornaM. Hughes. London: Facet Publishing, 2012. 49–60. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bart, Ooghe, and Dries Moreels. “Analysing Selection for Digitisation: Current Practices and Common Incentives.” D-Lib Magazine 15.9/10 (2009): n. pag. Web. 12 Sept. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, Alice. “Digital Special Collections: The Big Picture.” RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage 10.1 (2009): 13–24. HighWire Press (Free Journals). Web. 1 Sept. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Seamus, Ian Anderson, Celia Duffy, Maria Economou, Ann Gow, Peter McKinney, and Rebecca Sharp. “III. Selecting Materials: An Iterative Process.” NINCH Guide to Good Practice in the digital Representation and Management of Cultural Heritage Materials. Washington, DC: Humanities Advanced Technology and Information Institute, University of Glasgow and National Initiative for Networked Cultural Heritage, 2002. 38–60. Web. 27 Feb. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffner, Jennifer, Francine Snyder, and Shannon Supple. Scan and Deliver: Managing User-Initiated Digitization in Special Collections and Archives. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research, 2011. Web. 1 Sept. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Abby. Strategies for Building Digitized Collections. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation, Council on Library and Information Resources, 2001. Web. 1 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Abby. Why Digitize? Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 1999. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vajcner, Mark. “The Importance of Context for Digitized Archival Collections.” Journal of the Association of History and Computing 11.1 (2008): n. pag. Web. 17 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vogt-O'Connor, DianeL. “IV. Selection of materials for scanning.” Handbook for digital projects: A Management Tool for Preservation and Access, Ed. MaxineK. Sitts. Andover, Massachusetts: Northeast Document Conservation Center, 2000. N. pag. Web. 17 Nov. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, AllisonB., and Don Gourley. Creating Digital Collections: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2008. Print.
   Google Scholar