Strategic Engagement: New Models of Relationship Management for Academic Librarians

References

• Auckland, M. (2012). Re-skilling for research: An investigation into the role and skills of subject and liaison librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.rluk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/RLUK-Re-skilling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bains, S. (2013). Teaching “old” librarians new tricks. SCONUL Focus 58, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bewick, L., & Corrall, S. (2010). Developing librarians as teachers: A study of their pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 42, 97–110. doi:10.1177/0961000610361419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, M. (2015). Relationship management. UKSG eNews 354. Retrieved December 4, 2015,from http://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/UKSG/354/Relationship-management/
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. M., Hook, S. J., Simmons-Welburn, J., & Williams, K. (2004). Libraries dealing with the future now. ARL Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues 324, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brewerton, A. (2011). “… and any other duties deemed necessary”: An analysis of subject librarian job descriptions. SCONUL Focus 51, 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Corrall, S. (2014). Library service capital: The case for measuring and managing intangible assets. In S. F. Tanackovi & B. Bosančić (Eds.), Assessing libraries and library users and use: 13th international conference on libraries in the digital age (pp. 21–32). Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://ozk.unizd.hr/lida/files/LIDA_2014_Proceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corrall, S. (2015). Capturing the contribution of subject librarians: Applying strategy maps and balanced scorecards to liaison work. Library Management 36, 223–234. doi:10.1108/LM-09-2014-0101
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. M., & Corrall, S. (2013). Evolving academic library specialties. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, 1526–1542. doi:10.1002/asi.22847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 46, 299–316. doi:10.1177/0961000613492542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donham, J., & Green, C. W. (2004). Developing a culture of collaboration: Librarian as consultant. Journal of Academic Librarianship 30, 314–321. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, B. (2012). Surviving to thriving: Advancing the institutional mission. Journal of Library Administration 52, 94–107. doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.630244
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Wright Coniglio, J. (2010). The new liaison librarian: Competencies for the 21st century academic library. In S. Walter & K. Williams (Eds.), The expert library: Staffing, sustaining and advancing the academic library in the 21st century (pp. 93–126). Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, ALA.
   Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence (Paperback ed.). London, UK: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, G., & Corrall, S. (2007). Revisiting the subject librarian: A study of English, Law and Chemistry. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 39, 79–91. doi:10.1177/0961000607077575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEFCE. (2015). Policy for open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201407/HEFCE2014_07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFLA. (2013). Riding the waves or caught in the tide? Navigating the evolving information environment: Insights from the IFLA trend report. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://trends.ifla.org/insights-document
   Google Scholar
• Jaguszewski, J. M., & Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times: Transforming liaison roles in research libraries. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/NRNT-Liaison-Roles-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. C. (2014). International open access week at small to medium U.S. academic libraries: The first five years. Journal of Academic Librarianship 40, 626–631. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libraries Sub-Committee of the Society of Legal Scholars. (2009). A library for the modern law school: A statement of standards for university law library provision in the United Kingdom. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://www.legalscholars.ac.uk/documents/SLS-Library-for-a-Modern-Law-School-Statement-2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Library Journal Research & Gale Cengage Learning. (2015). Bridging the librarian-faculty gap in the academic library 2015. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/downloads/2015-bridging-the-librarian-faculty-gap-in-the-academic-library/
   Google Scholar
• Malenfant, K. J. (2010). Leading change in the system of scholarly communication: A case study of engaging liaison librarians for outreach to faculty. College and Research Libraries 71, 63–76. doi:10.5860/crl.71.1.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. V. (1996). Subject specialization in British university libraries: A second survey. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 28, 159–169. doi:10.1177/096100069602800305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. A. (2011). The librarian as information consultant: Transforming reference for the Information Age. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pinfield, S. (2001). The changing role of subject librarians in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 33, 32–38. doi:10.1177/096100060103300104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestner, A., & Borg, M. (Eds.). (2016). User experience in libraries: Applying Ethnography and Human-Centred Design. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Relationship Management Group. (2015). 1st relationship management in HE libraries conference. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from https://relationshipmanagementgroup.wordpress.com/2015/06/03/1st-relationship-management-for-academic-libraries-conference-2/
   Google Scholar
• Rodwell, J., & Fairbairn, L. (2008). Dangerous liaisons? Library Management 29, 116–124. doi:10.1108/01435120810844694
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2, 121–139. doi:10.1007/bf01384942
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1987). Process consultation volume I: Its Role in Organization Development. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, I. (2014). Authors@UF campus conversation series: A case study. Public Services Quarterly 10, 263–282. doi:10.1080/15228959.2014.960641
   Google Scholar
• University of Nottingham. (2014). Complete list: RF research power rankings. Retrieved December 4, 2015, from https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/research/documents/complete-listing-rf-research-power-rankings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandegrift, M., & Colvin, G. (2012). Relational communications: Developing key connections. College & Research Libraries News 73, 386–389.
   Google Scholar
• Vassilakaki, E., & Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V. (2015). A systematic literature review informing library and information professionals' emerging roles. New Library World 116, 37–66. doi:10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0060
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., Gannon-Leary, P., & Bent, M. (2007). Providing effective library services for research. London, UK: Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhead, P. A., & Martin, J. V. (1982). Subject specialization in British university libraries: A survey. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 14, 93–108. doi:10.1177/096100068201400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. M. (2013). Starting scholarly conversations: A scholarly communication outreach program. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 2, eP1096.
   Google Scholar