References
- Basken, P. (2016, July 07). The U. of California's open-access promise hits a snag: The faculty. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-U-of-California-s/237044
- Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. ARL Bimonthly Report 223. Retrieved from http://www.sparc.arl.org/resources/papers-guides/the-case-for-institutional-repositories
- Day, A. (2018). Research information management: How the library can contribute to the campus conversation. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 24(1), 23–34. doi:10.1080/13614533.2017.1333014.
- Dempsey, L. (2014). Research information management systems — A new service category? Lorcan Dempsey's Weblog. Retrieved from http://orweblog.oclc.org/research-information-management-systems-a-new-service-category/
- Digital Scholarship@UNLV Collection Development Policy. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.library.unlv.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pages/dsunlv_collection_development_policy_sept_2017.pdf
- Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1), 1–11. doi:10.1045/january2005-foster.
- Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallières, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., & Hilf, E. R. (2008). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update. Serials Review, 34(1), 36–40. doi:10.1080/00987913.2008.10765150.
- Kingsley, D. (2008). Those who don't look don't find: Disciplinary considerations in repository advocacy. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(4), 204–218. doi:10.1108/10650750810914210.
- Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336. doi:10.1353/pla.2003.0039.
- Lynch, C. A. (2016). Foreward: A few reflections on the evolution of institutional repositories. In B. B. Callicott, D. Scherer, & A. Wesolek (Eds.), Making institutional repositories work (pp. xi–xiii). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
- Lynch, C. A. (2017). Updating the agenda for academic libraries and scholarly communications. College & Research Libraries, 78(2), 126–130. doi:10.5860/crl.78.2.126.
- Maybee, J. E. (2016). “Hegel's dialectics.” Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel-dialectics/
- Meadows, A. (2017). Collect, connect, and communicate! Alice Meadows blog. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/blog/2017/06/23/collect-connect-and-communicate
- Plutchak, T. S., & Moore, K. B. (2017). Dialectic: The aims of institutional repositories. Serials Librarian, 72(1-4), 27–35.
- Salo, D. (2008). Innkeeper at the Roach Motel. Library Trends, 57(2), 98–123.
- Schnitker, S. A., & Emmons, R. A. (2013). Hegel's thesis-antithesis-synthesis model. In A. L. C. Runehov, & L. Oviedo (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sciences and religions (p. 978). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
- UNLV Top Tier. (2017). Vision, Mission, and Path. Retrieved from https://www.unlv.edu/toptier/vision.
- Van de Velde, E. (2016). Let IR RIP. SciTechSociety. Retrieved from http://scitechsociety.blogspot.com.ar/2016/07/let-ir-rip.html.