Institutional Repository Promotion: Current Practices and Opinions in Texas Academia

References

• Armstrong, M. (2014). Institutional repository management models that support faculty research dissemination. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 30(1), 43–51. doi:10.1108/OCLC-07-2013-0028
   Google Scholar
• Bates, M., Loddington, S., Manuel, S., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Attitudes to the rights and rewards for author contributions to repositories for teaching and learning. ALT-J, 15(1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/09687760600837066
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, Á. (2016). Measuring compliance with a Spanish government open access mandate. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 757–764. doi:10.1002/asi.23422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, J., & Eden, B. L. (2014). Successful scholarly communication at a small university: Integration of education, services, and an institutional repository at Valparaiso University. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), 263–278. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.932264
   Google Scholar
• Coates, M. (2014). Electronic theses and dissertations: Differences in behavior for local and non-local users. Library Hi Tech, 32(2), 285–299. doi:10.1108/LHT-08-2013-0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey, D. T. (2011). Recruiting content for the institutional repository: The barriers exceed the benefits. Journal of Digital Information, 12(3), 1–18. Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/2068
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2010). Institutional repositories: Assessing their value to the academic community. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 131–147. doi:10.1108/14678041011064052
   Google Scholar
• Fortier, R., & Laws, E. (2014). Marketing an established institutional repository: Marquette Libraries’ research stewardship survey. Library Hi Tech News, 31(6), 12–15. doi:10.1108/LHTN-05-2014-0038
   Google Scholar
• Foster, N. F., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1), 1–27. doi:10.1045/january2005-foster
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, M. (2008). Involving the library and campus community in institutional repository projects. The Serials Librarian, 55(4), 568–576. doi:10.1080/03615260802380411
   Google Scholar
• Ghinazzi, C., & Hanson, M. (2018). Communication is key: Positioning the repository as a cornerstone of campus collaboration. The Serials Librarian, 74(1–4), 170–175. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2018.1427980
   Google Scholar
• Giesecke, J. (2011). Institutional repositories: Keys to success. Journal of Library Administration, 51(5–6), 529–542. doi:10.1080/01930826.2011.589340
   Google Scholar
• Henry, D. B., & Neville, T. M. (2017). Repositories at master’s institutions: a census and analysis. Library Resources & Technical Services, 61(3), 124–133. doi:10.5860/lrts.61n3.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantz, R. C., & Wilson, M. C. (2008). Institutional repositories: Faculty deposits, marketing, and the reform of scholarly communication. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(3), 186–195. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koler-Povh, T., Mikoš, M., & Turk, G. (2014). Institutional repository as an important part of scholarly communication. Library Hi Tech, 32(3), 423–434. doi:10.1108/LHT-10-2013-0146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, H., Koenig, J., McGeachin, R. B., & Tucker, S. L. (2011). Structure, features, and faculty content in ARL member repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(4), 333–342. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2011.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, J., Winkler, H., Daniel, K., Barba, S., & Yang, L. (2017). Know your crowd: A case study in digital collection marketing. The Reference Librarian, 58(3), 190–201. doi:10.1080/02763877.2016.1271758
   Google Scholar
• Schlangen, M. (2015). Content, credibility, and readership: Putting your institutional repository on the map. Public Services Quarterly, 11(3), 217–224. doi:10.1080/15228959.2015.1060148
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, L. (2014). Institutional repositories: An analysis of trends and a proposed collaborative future. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3/4), 360–376. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.943919
   Google Scholar
• St. Jean, B., Rieh, S., Yakel, E., & Markey, K. (2011). Unheard voices: Institutional repository end-users. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 21–42. doi:10.5860/crl-71r1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, A. (2017). Rethinking institutional repositories. Online Searcher, 41(2), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. S., Akeriwe, M. L., & Aikins, A. A. (2016). Communicating the value of an institutional repository: Experiences at Ghana’s university for development studies. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 22(2–3), 325–336. doi:10.1080/13614533.2016.1183135
   Google Scholar
• Wesolek, A. (2013). Who uses this stuff, anyway? An investigation of who uses the DigitalCommons@USU. The Serials Librarian, 64(1–4), 299–306. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2013.760298
   Google Scholar
• Xia, J., & Opperman, D. D. (2010). Current trends in institutional repositories for institutions offering master’s and baccalaureate degrees. The Serials Review, 36(1), 10–18. doi:10.1080/00987913.2010.10765272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J., Gilchrist, S. B., Smith, N. X. P., Kingery, J. A., Radecki, J. R., Wilhelm, M. L., … Mahn, A. J. (2012). A review of open access self-archiving mandate policies. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(1), 85–102. doi:10.1353/pla.2012.0000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiotis, K. (2008). Electronic theses and dissertation (ETD) repositories: What are they? Where do they come from? How do they work? OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 24(2), 101–115. doi:10.1108/10650750810875458
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Boock, M., & Wirth, A. A. (2015). It takes more than a mandate: Factors that contribute to increased rates of article deposit to an institutional repository. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 3(1), eP1208. doi:10.7710/2162-3309.1208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar