Approaches in Information Research

References

• Andrew, D. P., Pederson, P. M., and McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. London: Human Kinetics Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Wadsworth: Belmont.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2011). Introduction to social research (5th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2008). Introducing qualitative research: A student guide to the craft of doing qualitative research. Los Angeles: doi:Sage
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2004). Issues in mixing qualitative and quantitative approaches to research. In. R. Buber, J. Gadner, & L. Richards (Eds.), Applying qualitative methods to marketing management research (pp. 141–156). UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for social sciences (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. M. (Ed.) (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2010). Designing social research: The logic of anticipation (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2008). Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research? In M. M. Bergan (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 87–100). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caruth, G. D. (2013). Demystifying mixed methods research design: A review of the literature. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(2), 112–122. doi:10.13054/mije.13.35.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano, C. V. L., & Smith, K. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daymon, C. and Halloway, I. (2011). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications. New York: Routledge Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–29). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DePoy, E., & Gitlin, L. N. (2011). Introduction to research: Understanding and applying multiple strategies (4th ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier/Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Donalek, J. G. (2004). Demystifying nursing research: Phenomenology as a qualitative research method. Urologic Nursing, 24, 516–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrheim, K. (2006). Research design. In M. J. T. Blanche, M.T. Blanche, K. Durrheim, & D. Painter (Eds.), Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (pp. 33–59). Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, W. E., & Kennedy, T. D. (2013). An applied reference guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eyisi, D. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson education.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, G. E., & Clayton, P. (2005). Qualitative research for the information professional. London: Facet Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., Kreider, H., & Mayer, E. (2004). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in social enquiry. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 274–281). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Halcomb, E. J., & Andrew, S. (2009). Managing mixed methods projects. In S. Andrew, & E. J. Halcomb (Eds.), Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences (pp. 50–64). West Sussex: Wiley-Black Well.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. F. (2013). Mixed methods: In search of a paradigm. In T. Le, & Q. Lê (Eds.), Conducting research in a changing and challenging world (pp. 71–78). New York: Nova Science Pub Incorporated. Retrieved from https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=41127
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, M. R. (2011). Research design in qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.) Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 147–163). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, E. (2010). Finding your way in qualitative research. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hittleman, D., & Simons, A. (2001). Interpreting education research: An education for consumers of research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. (1980). The philosophy of social research. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. In J. Heigham, & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 135–164). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jaye, C. (2002). Doing qualitative research in general practice: Methodological utility and engagement. Family Practice, 19(5), 557–562. doi:10.1093/fampra/19.5.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Education research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed method research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, V. J., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instruction design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–77. doi:10.1007/BF02504994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalof, L., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2008). Essentials of social research. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. E. (2005). Research paradigms and meaning making: A primer. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758–770.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (3rd ed.). Los Angeles. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lapan, S. D., Quartaroli, M. T., & Riemer, F. J. (2012). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. D. Lapan, M. T. Quartaroli, & F. J. Riemer (Eds.) Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs (pp. 1–18). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormond, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, E. (2009). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: insights into design and analysis issues. Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research, 3(4), 218–227.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, L. F., Silverman, S. J., & Spirduso, W. W. (2010). Reading and understanding research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Majyambere, M. (2014). information seeking behaviour of humanities/arts international postgraduate students in public universities of KwaZulu Natal province of South Africa (Doctoral dissertation). Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Markwei, E. D. (2013). Everyday life information seeking behavior of marginalized youth (Doctoral dissertation). Vancouver: The University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475. doi:10.1177/1077800410364740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. L. T., & Murnane, J. A. (2010). Paradigm, methodology and method: Intellectual integrity in consumer scholarship. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 419–427. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00883.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, P., & Chapman, S. (2005). Research methods (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, H. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher. 13(5), 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Munyoro, P. (2014). Library and information science education in Zimbabwe and the paradigm shift in the information industry. Ph.D. Thesis. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu Natal.
   Google Scholar
• Ngulube, P. (2005). Research procedures used by Master of Information Studies students at the University of Natal in the period 1982–2002 with special reference to their sampling techniques and survey response rates: A methodological discourse. The International Information & Library Review, 37(2), 127–143. doi:10.1080/10572317.2005.10762673
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, J. (2010). Introducing qualitative research. In K. Maree (Eds.), First steps in research (pp. 46–68). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2003). Effect sizes in qualitative research: A prolegomenon quality and quantity. International Journal of Methodology, 37, 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387. doi:10.1080/13645570500402447
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2007). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J. (2011). Best practice in quantitative methods teaching: Comparing social science curricula across countries. In G. Payne & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching the quantitative methods: Getting the basic right (pp. 32–48). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, G. (2011). Mapping the academic landscape of quantitative methods. In G. Payne, & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching the quantitative methods: Getting the basic right (pp. 9–31). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. R. (1999). Recent trends in research: A methodological essay. Library and Information Science, 21(1), 91–119. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(99)80007-3
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2008). Research methods for social work (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. D. (2010). Discovering research methods in psychology: A student’s guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sarpsford, R. and Jupp, V. (2006). Data Collection and analysis. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Schensul, J. J. (2012). Methodology, methods, and tools in qualitative research. In Lapan, S. D., Quataroli, M. T. and Riemer, F. J. (eds). Qualitative research: an introduction to methods and designs. pp. 69–103.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Bowers-Brown, T. (2010). Different kinds of qualitative data collection methods. In L. Dahlberg & C. McCaig (Eds.), Practical research and evaluation: A start-Tofinish guide for practitioners (pp. 111–125). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 21–54. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zawedde, B. N. (2012). Preservation of and access to legal deposit materials in South Africa. Ph.D. Thesis. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu Natal.
   Google Scholar