Student Engagement in Improving Access to Taught Course Content at LSE Library: practicalities and Pitfalls

References

• Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 17(1), 18–32. doi:10.1037/a0022086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Students’ academic reading preferences: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 3–13. doi:10.1177/0961000616656044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists: An introductory resource with examples. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., Conway, N., & Taylorson, B. (2010). Reading lists – pitching it right! SCONUL Focus, 50, 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, J., & Dale, P. (2008). Redesigning services for the net-gen and beyond: A holistic review of pedagogy, resource, and learning space. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 14(1–2), 99–114. doi:10.1080/13614530802518941
   Google Scholar
• Becker, B. W. (2015). Ebooks in the library: The current state of research. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 34(4), 230–233. doi:10.1080/01639269.2015.1096156
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE, Los Angeles
   Google Scholar
• Brewerton, G. (2014). Implications of student and lecturer qualitative views on reading lists: A case study at Loughborough University, UK. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20(1), 78–90. doi:10.1080/13614533.2013.864688
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, D. (2017). The direct library supply of individual textbooks to students: Examining the value proposition. Information and Learning Science, 118(11–12), 629–641. doi:10.1108/ILS-07-2017-0072
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, D. (2019). Textbooks—An ever changing landscape and the move towards digital. Against the Grain, 31(3), 1–15. Retrieved from https://against-the-grain.com/2019/06/v31-3-textbooks-an-ever-changing-landscape-and-the-move-towards-digital/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron, C., & Siddall, G. (2015). Academic staff perceptions and use of reading lists for book ordering. SCONUL Focus, 64, 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., & Siddall, G. (2017). Opening lines of communication: Book ordering and reading lists, the academics view. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(1), 42–59. doi:10.1080/13614533.2016.1224769
   Google Scholar
• Casselden, B., & Pears, R. (2020). Higher education student pathways to ebook usage and engagement, and understanding: Highways and cul de sacs. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(2), 601–619. 096100061984142. doi:10.1177/0961000619841429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chad, K. (2018). The rise of library centric reading list systems. HELibTech Briefing Paper, 5. Retrieved from https://helibtech.com/briefing_papers#the_rise_of_library_centric_reading_list_systems
   Google Scholar
• Chelin, J., McEachran, M., & Williams, E. (2005). Five hundred into 4 won’t go – how to solve the problem of reading list expectations. SCONUL Focus, 36, 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288–325. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clowes, R. W. (2019). Screen reading and the creation of new cognitive ecologies. AI & Society, 34(4), 705–720. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0785-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, D. (2020). Embedding constructive alignment of reading lists in course design. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(1), 67–74. doi:10.1177/0961000618804004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R. (2015). Implementing a resource list management system in an academic library. The Electronic Library, 33(2), 210–223. doi:10.1108/EL-05-2013-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foasberg, N. M. (2014). Student reading practices in print and electronic media. College & Research Libraries, 75(5), 705–723. doi:10.5860/crl.75.5.705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Retrieved from http://www.ECU.eblib.com.au/EBLWeb/patron/?target=patron&extendedid=P_287863_0.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnup, B. (2019). Understanding e-textbooks through a Student Lens. Against the Grain, 31(3), 26–29. Retrieved from https://against-the-grain.com/2019/06/v31-3-understanding-e-textbooks-through-a-student-lens/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston, N., & Salaz, A. M. (2019). Exploring the reasons why university students prefer print over digital texts: An Australian perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(2), 126–145. doi:10.1080/24750158.2019.1587858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J., Cooper, J., & Brewerton, G. (2012). Redeveloping the Loughborough online reading list system. Ariadne, 69. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/69/knight-et-al/.
   Google Scholar
• Krol, E. (2019). Can online reading lists achieve meaningful engagement with the academics and students within a digital landscape? A case study from the University of West London. Today and Tomorrow - Infrastructures, Services, Users. Presented at the 5th International Scientific Conference Information Science in The Age of Change: Digital Revolution, Warsaw, Poland. Retrieved from https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/6091/.
   Google Scholar
• Lanclos, D. (2016). Embracing an ethnography agenda: Context, collaboration and complexity. In A. Priestner and M. Borg (Eds.), User experience in libraries: Applying ethnography and human-centred design (pp. 21–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewellen, R., Bischof, S., & Plum, T. (2016). EBL ebook use compared to the use of equivalent print books and other eresources: A University of Massachusetts Amherst – MINES for Libraries® case study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 17(2), 150–164. doi:10.1108/PMM-04-2016-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2012). Undergraduate students searching and reading Web sources for writing. Educational Media International, 49(3), 201–215. doi:10.1080/09523987.2012.738013
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Stokes, P. (2006). Reading lists under the spotlight: Cinderella or superstar? SCONUL Focus, 37, 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, K., Stone, G., Sharman, A., & Davison, E. (2017). Student reading lists: Evaluating the student experience at the University of Huddersfield. The Electronic Library, 35(2), 322–332. doi:10.1108/EL-12-2015-0252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D. (2016). Buy, borrow, or access online?: Format behaviors among college freshmen in a reading-intensive course. Reference Services Review, 44(4), 583–595. doi:10.1108/RSR-04-2016-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S., & Boustany, J. (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PLOS One, 13(5), e0197444. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro, M., Clasing, P., Kelly, N., Gonzalez, C., Jara, M., Alarcón, R., … Saurina, E. (2016). Library resources and students’ learning outcomes: Do all the resources have the same impact on learning? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 551–556. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A., & Tatham, S. (2019). How valuable are e-textbooks to the student experience? An analysis of e-textbook provisions at the University of Sussex. Against the Grain, 31(3), 22–24. Retrieved from https://against-the-grain.com/2019/06/v31-3-how-valuable-are-e-textbooks-to-the-student-experience-an-analysis-of-e-textbook-provisions-at-the-university-of-sussex/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman, T., Beetham, H., & Knight, S. (2018). Digital experience insights survey 2018: Findings from students in UK further and higher education. Retrieved from JISC website: http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6967/1/Digital_experience_insights_survey_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, M., & Musto, L. (2017). Faculty perceptions of Loughborough’s online reading list system (LORLS) at Dublin Business School (DBS). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(4), 353–376. doi:10.1080/13614533.2016.1272473
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S., & Coyle, D. (2016). Books right here right now at the University of Manchester Library. Insights the UKSG Journal, 29(2), 172–180. doi:10.1629/uksg.309
   Google Scholar
• Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Wendt, J., & Lunde, R. (2013). Electronic versus print textbooks: The influence of textbook format on university students’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivation, and text anxiety. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(3), 179–188. doi:10.1080/08923647.2013.796230
   Google Scholar
• Siddall, G., & Rose, H. (2014). Reading lists – time for a reality check? An investigation into the use of reading lists as a pedagogical tool to support the development of information skills amongst Foundation Degree students. Library and Information Research, 38(118), 52–73. doi:10.29173/lirg605
   Google Scholar
• Sidi, Y., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2016). Generalizing screen inferiority—Does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks? Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 15–33. doi:10.1007/s11409-015-9150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidi, Y., Shpigelman, M., Zalmanov, H., & Ackerman, R. (2017). Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing. Learning and Instruction, 51, 61–73. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. doi:10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, H., & Bilson, J. (2018). Assessing the impact on the student experience of embedding information resources in the Guided Learner Journey at the University of Hertfordshire. Ariadne, 78. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/78/singer-and-bilson/.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, P., & Martin, L. (2008). Reading lists: A study of tutor and student perceptions, expectations and realities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 113–125. doi:10.1080/03075070801915874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horne, S., Henze, M., Schuh, K. L., Colvin, C., & Russell, J.-E. (2017). Facilitating adoption of an interactive e-textbook among university students in a large, introductory biology course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 477–495. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9153-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horne, S., Russell, J., & Schuh, K. L. (2016). The adoption of mark-up tools in an interactive e-textbook reader. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 407–433. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9425-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsby, O., & Bourne, F. (2019). Putting our students at the heart of what we do—ETextbooks at the University of Manchester. Against the Grain, 31(3), 16–19. Retrieved from https://against-the-grain.com/2019/06/v31-3-putting-our-students-at-the-heart-of-what-we-do-etextbooks-at-the-university-of-manchester/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar