The Digital Monument to the Jewish Community in the Netherlands: a meaningful, ritual place for commemoration

References

• Arthur, P. (2009). Trauma online: Public exposure of personal grief and suffering. Traumatology, 15(4), 65–75. doi:10.1177/1534765609350781
   Google Scholar
• Blom, J. (2008). Nooit meer naar huis. Mijn ontsnapping uit de Hollandsche Schouwburg [Never back home again. My escape form the Dutch Theatre]. Laren: Uitgeverij Verbum.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, P. (2005). Holocaust monuments and national memory. France and Germany since 1989. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. (2000). Remembering. A phenomenological study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. (2009). Getting back into place. Towards a renewed understanding of the place – world. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, E. (2013). Public memory in the making (pp. 1–28). Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.edwardscasey.com
   Google Scholar
• Dunk, H. von der (2004). Een digitaal monument is een smakeloze banalisering [A digital monument is a tasteless banality]. Historisch Nieuwsblad, 3, 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Faro, L. (2014). Postponed monuments in the Netherlands. Manifestation, context, and meaning. Groningen/Tilburg: Netherlands Studies in Ritual and Liturgy..
   Google Scholar
• Foot, K., Warnick, B., & Schneider, S. (2006). Web-based memorializing after September 11: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Computer – Mediated Communication, 11, 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, K. (2003). Shadowed ground. America’s landscapes of violence and tragedy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geser, H. (1998). Yours virtually forever. Death memorials and remembrance sites in the WWW. Sociology in Switzerland: Towards cybersociety and vireal social relations. Retrieved October 30, 2013, from http://socio.ch/intcom/thgeser07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, R. (2010). Ritual criticism. Case studies in its practice, essays on its theory. Waterloo: Ritual Studies International.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, R. (2014). The craft of ritual studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins, E. (2007). Between archive and participation: Public memory in a digital age. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37, 401–422. doi:10.1080/02773940601086794
   Google Scholar
• Heyting, L. (January 28, 2000). Digitaal monument voor vervolgde joden in Nederland. Opdat hun naam niet wordt uitgewist. [Digital monument for persecuted Jews in the Netherlands. Lest their names be forgotten] NRC Handelsblad [online]. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.retro.nrc.nl/W2/Nieuws/2000/01/28/Vp/cs.html
   Google Scholar
• Langer, R., Lüddeckens, D., Radde, K., & Snoek, J. (2006).Transfer of ritual. Journal of Ritual Studies, 20(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Margry, P. J., & Sánchez-Carretero, C. (Eds.). (2011). Grassroots memorials. The politics of memorializing traumatic death. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marschall, S. (2013). The virtual memory landscape: The impact of information technology on collective memory and commemoration in Southern Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 39(1), 193–205. doi:10.1080/03057070.2013.763325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, P. (2010). Voorbij het kerkgebouw. De speelruimte van een ander sacraal domein [Beyond the church building. Playground of a different sacred domain]. Heeswijk: Uitgeverij Abdij van Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Post, P., Molendijk, A. & Kroesen, J. (Eds.). (2011). Sacred places in modern western culture. Leuven: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Recuber, T. (2012). The prosumption of commemoration: Disasters, digital memory banks, and online collective memory. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 531–549. doi:10.1177/0002764211429364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory. Remembering the Holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santino, J. (Ed.). (2006). Spontaneous shrines and the public memorialization of death. New York: Palgrave Mac Millan.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, K. (2009). Monument wars. Washington D.C., the National Mall, and the transformation of the memorial landscape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (1987). To take place. Toward theory in ritual. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spielmann, J. (1995). Der Process ist genauso wichtig wie das Ergebnis. In Neue Gesellschaft für Bildende Kunst (Ed.), Der Wettberwerb für das ‘Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas’ [The process is just as important as the outcome. The competition for a “Monument to the murdered Jews from Europe”] (pp. 128–145). Berlin: NGBK.
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. (1993). The texture of memory. Holocaust monuments and meaning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar