Who is called to be a bishop? A study in psychological type profiling of bishops in the Church of England

References

• Beesley, P. 2001. “The Legal Role of Bishops.” In Mellows Report, edited by Resourcing Bishops, 227–249. London: Church House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, T. 2002. The Bishops. London: SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Bigelow, E. D., R. Fitzgerald, P. Busk, E. Girault, and J. Avis. 1988. “Psychological Characteristics of Catholic Sisters: Relationships Between the MBTI and Other Measures.” Journal of Psychological Type 14: 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, G. 1984. “Psychological Types in a Catholic Convent: Applications to Community Living and Congregational Data.” Journal of Psychological Type 8: 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron Report. 1990. Episcopal Ministry: Report on the Archbishops’ Group on the Epsicopate. London: Church House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Church of England. 2000. Common Worship: Services and Prayers for the Church of England. London: Church House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L., B. Duncan, and L. J. Francis. 2006. “Psychological Type Preferences of Roman Catholic Priests in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 27: 157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L., L. J. Francis, J. Bailey, and M. Robbins. 2003. “Psychological Types in Church in Wales Congregations.” The Psychologist in Wales 15: 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C., L. J. Francis, and M. Robbins. 2004. “Psychological Type and Sex Differences Among Church Leaders in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 25: 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. L., T. Horsfall, and L. J. Francis. 2005. “Psychological Types of Male Missionary Personnel Training in England: A Role for Thinking Type Men?” Pastoral Psychology 53: 475–482.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. J., and M. Guest. 2007. Bishops, Wives and Children: Spiritual Capital Across the Generations. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Delis-Bulhoes, V. 1990. “Jungian Psychological Types and Christian Belief in Active Church Members.” Journal of Psychological Type 20: 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J. 2005. Faith and Psychology: Personality, Religion and the Individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J. 2009. “Psychological Type Theory and Religious and Spiritual Experience.” In International Handbook of Education for Spirituality, Care and Wellbeing, edited by M. De Souza, L. J. Francis, J. O’Higgins-Norman and D. G. Scott, 125–146. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., C. L. Craig, and A. Butler. 2007. “Psychological Types of Male Evangelical Anglican Seminarians in England.” Journal of Psychological Type 67: 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., C. L. Craig, T. Horsfall, and C. F. J. Ross. 2005. “Psychological Types of Male and Female Evangelical Lay Church Leaders in England, Compared with United Kingdom Population Norms.” Fieldwork in Religion 1: 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., C. L. Craig, M. Whinney, D. Tilley, and P. Slater. 2007. “Psychological Profiling of Anglican Clergy in England: Employing Jungian Typology to Interpret Diversity, Strengths, and Potential Weaknesses in Ministry.” International Journal of Practical Theology 11: 266–284.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., B. Duncan, C. L. Craig, and G. Luffman. 2004. “Type Patterns Among Anglican Congregations in England.” Journal of Adult Theological Education 1: 66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., S. Gubb, and M. Robbins. 1999. “Psychological Type Profile of Lead Elders Within the Newfrontiers Network of Churches in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 30: 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., K. Littler, and M. Robbins. 2010. “Psychological Type and Offa’s Dyke: Exploring Differences in the Psychological Type Profile of Anglican Clergy Serving in England and Wales.” Contemporary Wales 23: 240–251.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., C. L. Craig, and G. Hall. 2008. “Psychological Type and Attitude Toward Celtic Christianity among Committed Churchgoers in the United Kingdom: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 23: 181–191.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., P. Nash, S. Nash, and C. L. Craig. 2007. “Psychology and Youth Ministry: Psychological Type Preferences of Christian Youth Workers in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Youth Ministry 5(2): 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., V. J. Payne, and S. H. Jones. 2001a. “Psychological Types of Male Anglican Clergy in Wales.” Journal of Psychological Type 56: 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., A. W. Penson, and S. H. Jones. 2001. “Psychological Types of Male and Female Bible College Students in England.” Mental Health, Religion and Culture 4: 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., and M. Robbins. 2002. “Psychological Types of Male Evangelical Church Leaders.” Journal of Belief and Values 23: 217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., M. Robbins, and J. Astley, eds. 2009. Empirical Theology in Texts andTables: Qualitative, Quantitative and Comparative Perspectives. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., M. Robbins, and C. L. Craig. 2011. “The Psychological Type Profile of Anglican Churchgoers in England: Compatible or Incompatible With Their Clergy?” International Journal of Practical Theology 15: 243–259.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., M. Robbins, B. Duncan, and M. Whinney. 2010. “Confirming the Psychological Type Profile of Anglican Clergymen in England: A Ministry for Intuitives.” In Psychology of Intuition, edited by B. Ruelas and V. Briseno, 211–219. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., M. Robbins, and A. Ryland. 2012. “Called For Leadership: Psychological Type Profile of Leaders Within the Newfrontiers Network of Churches in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 40: 220–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., M. Robbins, A. Williams, and R. Williams. 2007. “All Types Are Called, But Some Are More Likely to Respond: The Psychological Profile of Rural Anglican Churchgoers in Wales.” Rural Theology 5: 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, L. J., and A. Village. 2008. Preaching With All Our Souls. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardt, R. 1983. “Liberal Religion and Personality Type.” Research in Psychological Type 6: 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Grundy, M. 2011. Leadership and Oversight: New Models for Episcopal Ministry. London: Mowbray.
   Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, G. L. 1984. “The Person in Ministry: Psychological Type and the Seminary.” Journal of Psychological Type 8: 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Holsworth, T. E. 1984. “Type Preferences Among Roman Catholic Seminarians.” Journal of Psychological Type 8: 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. 1971. Psychological Types: The Collected Works. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, W. K., and L. J. Francis. 2008. “Psychological Type Preferences of Female Bible College Students in England.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 29: 101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, W. K., L. J. Francis, and C. L. Craig. 2008. “Psychological Type Preferences of Male British Assemblies of God Bible College Students: Tough Minded or Tender Hearted?” Journal of the European Pentecostal Theological Association 28: 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, W. K., L. J. Francis, and M. Robbins. 2011. “A Distinctive Leadership for a Distinctive Network of Churches? Psychological Type Theory and the Apostolic Networks.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 20: 306–322.
   Google Scholar
• Keirsey, D., and M. Bates. 1978. Please Understand Me. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis.
   Google Scholar
• Keulemans, M. 2009. The Development of the Anglican Episcopate in Mainland Britain. University of Wales, Bangor: Unpublished DMin dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Report, Mellows. 2001. Resourcing Bishops: The First Report of the Archbishops’ Review Group on Bishops; Needs and Resources. London: Church House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, I. B., and M. H. McCaulley. 1985. Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, R. A. 1988. “Episcopacy.” In The Study of Anglicanism, edited by S. Sykes and J. Booty, 296–312. London: SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Perry Report. 2001. Working With The Spirit: Choosing Diocesan Bishops. London: Church House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Podmore, C. 2006. “The Church of England’s Understanding of Episcopacy.” Theology 109: 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Rehak, M. C. 1998. “Identifying the Congregation’s Corporate Personality.” Journal of Psychological Type 44: 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., and L. J. Francis. 2011. “All Are Called, But Some Psychological Types Are More Likely to Respond: Profiling Churchgoers in Australia.” Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion 22: 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. F. J. 1993. “Type Patterns Among Active Members of the Anglican Church: Comparisons with Catholics, Evangelicals and Clergy.” Journal of Psychological Type 26: 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. F. J. 1995. “Type Patterns Among Catholics: Four Anglophone Congregations Compared with Protestants, Francophone Catholics and Priests.” Journal of Psychological Type 33: 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, S. 2001. “A Theology of Episcopacy.” In Mellows Report, edited by Resourcing Bishops, 217–226. London: Church House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Village, A., S. Baker, and S. Howat. 2012. “Psychological Type Profiles of Churchgoers in England.” Mental Health, Religion and Culture 15: 969–978.
   Google Scholar