Misrepresenting religious education’s past and present in looking forward: Gearon using Kuhn’s concepts of paradigm, paradigm shift and incommensurability

References

• ter Avest, I., D-P. Jozsa, T. Knauth, J. Rosón, and G. Skeie, eds. 2009. Dialogue and Conflict on Religion. Studies of Classroom Interaction on European Countries, Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. P. 2014. Education, Religion and Diversity: Developing a New Model of Religious Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. 1974. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1962. “Religion and the Anthropologists.” In Social Anthropology and Other Essays, edited by Edward Evans Pritchard, 155–171. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franken, L., and P. Loobuyck, eds. 2011. Religious Education in a Plural, Secularised Society. A Paradigm Shift. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R. 2015. “Review of On Holy Ground: The Theory and Practice of Religious Education, by Liam Gearon. Journal of Beliefs and Values 36. doi:10.1080/13617672.2015.1013823.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, B., and R. Jackson. 2014. “Religion and Education in England.” In Religious Education at Schools in Europe, Part Two: Western Europe. Wiener Forum für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft, Band 10.2, edited by M. Rothgangel, R. Jackson, and M. Jäggle, 65–98. Göttingen: Vienna University Press/V&R unipress.10.14220/9783737002684
   Google Scholar
• Gearon, L. 2013. MasterClass in Religious Education: Transforming Teaching and Learning. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Gearon, L. 2014. On Holy Ground: The Theory and Practice of Religious Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. 1964. Religious Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmitt, M. 2000. “The Captivity and Liberation of Religious Education and the Meaning and Significance of Pedagogy.” In Pedagogies of Religious Education, edited by M. Grimmitt, 7–23. London: McCrimmons.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 1997. Religious Education: An Interpretive Approach. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2004. Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality: Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2006. “Understanding Religious Diversity in a Plural World: The Interpretive Approach.” In International Handbook of the Religious, Moral and Spiritual Dimensions of Education, edited by M. De Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson, and A. McGrady, 399–414. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2008a. “Contextual Religious Education and the Interpretive Approach.” British Journal of Religious Education 30 (1): 13–24.10.1080/01416200701711675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2008b. “Hermeneutics and Religious Education: The Interpretive Approach in Relation to the Work of Jürgen Lott.” In Religion Education. On the Boundaries between Study of Religions, Education and Theologies: Jürgen Lott and the Bremen Approach in International Perspective, edited by Christa Dommel and Gordon Mitchell, 189–208. Bremen: Kleio Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2008c. “The Emergence and Development of the Interpretive Approach.” In Lived Religion – Conceptual, Empirical and Practical Theological Approaches: Essays in Honour of Hans Günter Heimbrock, edited by H. Streib, A. Dinter, and K. Söderblom, 309–322. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004163775.i-404
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2009a. “Understanding the Religions and Worldviews of Others. Alliance of Civilizations Forum.” Istanbul, Turkey. Accessed November 15, 2014. http://erb.unaoc.org/understanding-the-religions-and-worldviews-of-others/.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2009b. “Studying Religions: The Interpretive Approach in Brief.” Accessed November 15, 2014. http://www.theewc.org/library/category/view/studying.religions.the.interpretive.approach.in.brief/.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2011a. “The Interpretive Approach as a Research Tool: Inside the REDCo Project.” British Journal of Religious Education 33 (2): 189–208. 10.1080/01416200.2011.543602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2011b. “The Interpretive Approach to Religious Education in a Social Studies Context in Publicly Funded Schools.” In Patterns of Research in Civics, History, Geography and Religious Education. Studier i de samhällsvetenskapligaämnenasdidaktik nr 14, edited by B. Schullerqvist, 145–163. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2012. “Religious Education and the Arts of Interpretation Revisited.” In On the Edge: (Auto) Biography and Pedagogical Theories on Religious Education, edited by I. ter Avest, 57–68. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-175-7
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2014a. Signposts: Policy and Practice for Teaching about Religions and Nonreligious Worldviews in Intercultural Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2014b. “Addressing Religious Extremism: A Positive Approach for Policy Makers and Practitioners.” In Religion and Conflict in Global Perspective, edited by D. Cere and T. Thorp, 70–77. London: Tony Blair Faith Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Knauth, T. 2009. “Dialogue on a Grassroots Level: Analysing Dialogue Oriented Classroom Interaction in Hamburg RE.” In Dialogue and Conflict on Religion. Studies of Classroom Interaction in European Countries, edited by I. ter Avest, D-P. Jozsa, T. Knauth, J. Roson, and G. Skeie, 110–134. Waxmann: Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Knauth, T., D-P. Jozsa, G. Bertram-Troost, and J. Ipgrave, eds. 2008. Encountering Religious Pluralism in School and Society: A Qualitative Study of Teenage Perspectives in Europe. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kozyrev, F. 2009. “Dialogue about Religion: Incident Analysis of Classroom Interaction in St Petersburg.” In Dialogue and Conflict on Religion. Studies of Classroom Interaction in European Countries, edited by Ina ter Avest, Dan Paul Josza, Thorsten Knauth, and Javier Rosón, 194–224. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962, 1970) 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press. (1st edn1962; enlarged 2nd edn. 1970; 3rd edn. 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Lippe, M. (von der) 2010. “Youth, Religion and Diversity: A Qualitative Study of Young People’s Talk about Religion in a Secular and Plural Society: A Norwegian Case.” Unpublished PhD Thesis. Norway: University of Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Lippe, M. (von der) 2011. “Reality Can Bite: The Perspectives of Young People on the Role of Religion in Their World.” Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social 2 (2): 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt, E. 1991. “My Dad’s Hindu, My Mum’s Side Are Sikhs”: Issues in Religious Identity. Arts, Culture, Education, Research and Curriculum Paper. Charlbury: National Foundation for Arts Education. Accessed November 15, 2014. http://www.casas.org.uk/papers/pdfpapers/identity.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, K. 2009. “Brainwashing? An Example of Dialogue and Conflict from Religious Education in England.” In Dialogue and Conflict on Religion. Studies of Classroom Interaction in European Countries, edited by I. ter Avest, D-P. Josza, T. Knauth, and J. Rosón, 41–61. Waxmann: Münster.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady K. 2013. “Action Research and the Interpretive Approach to Religious Education.” Religion & Education 40 (1): 62–77 and in Miller J., O’Grady K. and McKenna U. (Eds) Religion in Education: Innovation in International Research. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schools Council. 1971. Religious Education in Secondary Schools. Schools Council Working Paper no. 36. London: Evans/Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Skeie G. 2008. “Dialogue and Conflict in the Religious Education Classroom: Some Intermediate Reflections from a Research Project.” In Lived Religion: Conceptual, Empirical and Practical Theological Approaches. Essays in Honour of Hans Günther Heimbrock, edited by H. Streib, A. Dinter, and K. Söderblom, 337–348. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. C. 1978. The Meaning and End of Religion. London: SPCK.
   Google Scholar
• Valk, P., G. Bertram-Troost, M. Friederici, and C. Béraud, eds. 2009. Teenagers’ Perspectives on the Role of Religion in Their Lives, Schools and Societies: A European Quantitative Study. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2003. “The Contours of Critical Religious Education: Knowledge, Wisdom and Truth.” British Journal of Religious Education 25 (4): 279–291.10.1080/0141620030250403
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2013. Christianity and Critical Realism: Ambiguity, Truth and Theological Literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar