Reframing phenomenological approaches in religious education: insights from affect theory and the aesthetics of religion

References

• Ahmed, S. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 2000. “Ninian Smart and the Phenomenological Approach to Religious Education.” Religion 30 (4): 315–322. doi:10.1006/reli.2000.0291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 2001a. “What Is Wrong with the Phenomenological Approach to Religious Education?” Religious Education 96 (4): 445–461. doi:10.1080/003440801753442366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 2001b. “Ideology, the Phenomenological Approach, and Hermeneutics: A Response to Professor Lovat.” Religious Education 96 (4): 572–581. doi:10.1080/003440801753442447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 2007. “The Disputed Legacy of Ninian Smart and Phenomenological Religious Education: A Critical Response to Kevin O’ Grady.” British Journal of Religious Education 29 (2): 157–168. doi:10.1080/01416200601159280.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, P. 2009. “An Honest Appraisal of Phenomenological Religious Education and a Final, Honest Reply to Kevin O’ Grady.” British Journal of Religious Education 31 (1): 69–72. doi:10.1080/01416200802560146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, D. 2005. “On Feeling and Emotion in Religious Experience and Understanding.” Journal of Beliefs & Values 26 (1): 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan, J., ed. 2017. Feeling Religion. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretson, K. 2009. “Phenomenology and Religious Education Theory.” In International Handbook of the Religious, Moral and Spiritual Dimensions in Education, edited by M. Souza, K. Engebretson, G. Durka, R. Jackson, and A. McGrady, 651–665. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franken, L. 2018. “Religious Studies and Nonconfessional RE: Countering the Debates.” Religion & Education 45 (2): 155–172. doi:10.1080/15507394.2018.1452519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieser, A. 2016. “Aesthetics.” In Vocabulary for the Study of Religion, edited by R. Segal and K. von Stuckrad, 14–23. Vol. 1. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Grieser, A., and J. Johnston. 2017. “What Is an Aesthetics of Religion? from the Senses of Meaning—and Back Again.” In Aesthetics of Religion: A Connective Concept, edited by A. Grieser and J. Johnston, 1–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 1997. Religious Education: An Interpretive Approach. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, W. B. 1960. The Meaning of Religion: Lectures in the Phenomenology of Religion. Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Lovat, T. 2001. “In Defence of Phenomenology.” Religious Education 96 (4): 564–570. doi:10.1080/003440801753442438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovat, T. 2005. “The Agony and Ecstasy of Phenomenology as a Method: The Contribution to Australian Religious Education.” Journal of Religious Education 53 (2): 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. 2009. “Religious Sensations: Why Media, Aesthetics and Power Matter in the Study of Contemporary Religion.” In Religion: Beyond a Concept, edited by H. De Vries, 3–59. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. 2013. “Material Mediations and Religious Practices of World-Making.” In Religion across Media: From Early Antiquity to Late Modernity, edited by K. Lundby, 1–19. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Museka, G. 2019. “Toward the Implementation of A Multifaith Approach in Religious Education: A Phenomenological Guide.” Religious Education 114 (2): 130–142. doi:10.1080/00344087.2018.1560745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ Grady, K. 2005. “Professor Ninian Smart, Phenomenology and Religious Education.” British Journal of Religious Education 27 (3): 227–238. doi:10.1080/01416200500141249.
   Google Scholar
• O’ Grady, K. 2009. “Honesty in Religious Education: Some Further Remarks on the Legacy of Ninian Smart and Related Issues, in Reply to L. Philip Barnes.” British Journal of Religious Education 31 (1): 65–68. doi:10.1080/01416200802560096.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R. 1917/1958. The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-Rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and Its Relation to the Rational, trans. J. W. Harvey. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, C. H., and J. Protevi. 2017. “Affective Ideology and Trump’s Popularity.” Unpublished paper. Retrieved from http://www.protevi.com/john/TrumpAffect.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Protevi, J. 2009. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richman, N. I. 2018. “What Does It Feel like to Be Post-Secular? Ritual Expressions of Religious Affects in Contemporary Renewal Movements.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79 (3): 295–310. doi:10.1080/21692327.2018.1434011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riis, O., and L. Woodhead. 2010. A Sociology of Religious Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. 2015. Religious Affects: Animality, Evolution, and Power. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. 2017. “You Don’t Know What Pain Is: Affect, the Lifeworld, and Animal Ethics.” Studies in Christian Ethics 30 (1): 15–29. doi:10.1177/0953946816674146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, D. 2019. The Evolution of Affect Theory: The Humanities, the Sciences, and the Study of Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G. J., and M. Gregg. 2010. “An Inventory of Shimmers.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by M. Gregg and G. J. Seigworth, 2–25. Durham, NJ: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, E. J. 1975. Comparative Religion: A History. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, N. 1968. Secular Education and the Logic of Religion. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, N. 1973. The Science of Religion and the Sociology of Knowledge. New Jersey: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, N. 1976. The Religious Experience of Mankind. London: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, G. 2008. “Learning from Religions as ‘Skillful Means’: A Contribution to the Debate about the Identity of Religious Education.” British Journal of Religious Education 30 (3): 187–198. doi:10.1080/01416200802170037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thobani, S. 2017. “The Religious-Secular Interface and Representations of Islam in Phenomenological Religious Education.” Oxford Review of Education 43 (5): 612–625. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1352355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twiss, S. B., and W. H. Conser. 1992. Experience of the Sacred: Readings in the Phenomenology of Religion. Hannover and London: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ural, N., and A. L. Berg. 2019. “From Religious Emotions to Affects: Historical and Theoretical Reflections on Injury to Feeling, Self and Religion.” Culture and Religion 20 (2): 207–223. doi:10.1080/14755610.2019.1603168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Leeuw, G. 1963. Religion in Essence and Manifestation: A Study in Phenomenology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Scheve, C., and R. Walter-Jochum. 2019. “Affective Dynamics of Public Discourses on Religious Recognition in Secular Societies.” In Public Spheres of Resonance: Constellations of Affect and Language, edited by A. Fleig and C. von Scheve, 98–116. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• von Scheve, C., A. Berg, M. Haken, and N. Y. Ural. 2020. “Introduction: Affect and Emotion in Multi-Religious Secular Societies.” In Affect and Emotion in Multi-Religious Secular Societies, edited by C. von Scheve, A. Berg, M. Haken, and N. Y. Ural, 1–11. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. 2021. “The Affective Need to Belong: Belonging as an Affective Driver of Human Religion.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 82 (3): 280–301. doi:10.1080/21692327.2021.1978309.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., and F. Kambani. 2012. “The Teaching of Controversial Issues during Elementary-level History Instruction: Greek-Cypriot Teachers’ Perceptions and Emotions.” Theory and Research in Social Education 40 (2): 107–133. doi:10.1080/00933104.2012.670591.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2021a. “Necropolitics and Sentimentality in Education: The Ethical, Political and Pedagogical Implications of “Making Live and Letting Die” in the Current Political Climate.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 29 (3): 415–429. doi:10.1080/14681366.2020.1747108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2021b. “Rethinking Political Socialization in Schools: The Role of ‘Affective Indoctrination’.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 1–12. doi:10.1080/00131857.2021.2006634.
   Google Scholar