Citizenship agendas for the abject: the production of distrust in Amsterdam's youth and security domain

References

• de Koning, Anouk. 2013. “Creating an Exceptional Problem Neighbourhood: Media, Policy, and Amsterdam's ‘Notorious’ Diamantbuurt.” Etnofoor 25 (2): 13–30.
   Google Scholar
• de Koning, A., R. Jaffe, and M. Koster. 2015. “Citizenship Agendas In and Beyond the Nation-State: (En)countering Framings of the Good Citizen.” Citizenship Studies 19 (2): 121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., and P. W. A. Scholten. 2011. “Beyond the Dutch ‘Multicultural Model.’.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 12 (December 21): 331–348. doi:10.1007/s12134-010-0161-5.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, Mayanthi. 2009. “Exceptional Citizens: Secular Muslim Women and the Politics of Difference in France.” Social Anthropology 17 (4): 379–392. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2009.00081.x.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, R. D. 2003. “Cultural Essentialism and Cultural Anxiety.” Anthropological Theory 3 (2): 157–173. doi:10.1177/1463499603003002002.
   Google Scholar
• Lentin, Alana, and Gavan Titley. 2011. The Crises of Multiculturalism: Racism in a Neoliberal Age. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Tania Murray. 2007. “Practices of Assemblage and Community Forest Management.” Economy and Society 36 (2): 263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martineau, Erin. 2006. “‘Too Much Tolerance’: Hanging around Youth, Public Space, and the Problem of Freedom in the Netherlands.” PhD diss., City University New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mepschen, P., J. W. Duyvendak, and E. H. Tonkens. 2010. “Sexual Politics, Orientalism and Multicultural Citizenship in the Netherlands.” Sociology 44 (5): 962–979. doi:10.1177/0038038510375740.
   Google Scholar
• Nyers, Peter. 2003. “Abject Cosmopolitanism: The Politics of Protection in the Anti-deportation Movement.” Third World Quarterly 24 (6): 1069–1093. doi:10.1080/01436590310001630071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakes, Francis. 2004. “The Politics of Discontent: The Emergence of a New Criminal Justice Discourse in the Netherlands.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 43 (3): 284–298. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00328.x.
   Google Scholar
• Poynting, S., G. Noble, and P. Tabar. 2001. “Middle Eastern Appearances: ‘Ethnic Gangs’, Moral Panic and Media Framing.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 34 (1): 67–90. doi:10.1177/000486580103400105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, Baukje. 2002. “The Nerve to Break Taboos: New Realism in the Dutch Discourse on Multiculturalism.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 3 (3–4): 363–379. doi:10.1007/s12134-002-1020-9.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W. 2011. “Prepression: The Actuarial Archive and New Technologies of Security.” Theoretical Criminology 15 (4): 365–380. doi:10.1177/1362480610395366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinkel, Willem, and Friso Van Houdt. 2010. “The Double Helix of Cultural Assimilationism and Neo-liberalism: Citizenship in Contemporary Governmentality.” The British Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 696–715. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01337.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuilenburg, M., and R. van Swaaningen. 2013. “Veiligheid in een laatmoderne cultuur.” Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit 3 (2): 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Sharkey, Andrea, and Rob Shields. 2008. “Abject Citizenship – Rethinking Exclusion and Inclusion: Participation, Criminality and Community at a Small Town Youth Centre.” Children's Geographies 6 (3): 239–256. doi:10.1080/14733280802183973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein, Paul A. 2005. “Immigrant Racialization and the New Savage Slot: Race, Migration, and Immigration in the New Europe.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34 (1): 363–384. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora, and Marleen van der Haar. 2013. “People out of Place: Allochthony and Autochthony in the Netherlands' Identity Discourse – Metaphors and Categories in Action.” Journal of International Relations and Development 16 (2): 227–261. doi:10.1057/jird.2013.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar