1,453
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Citizenship agendas, urban governance and social housing in the Netherlands: an assemblage approach

Pages 214-228 | Received 07 Mar 2014, Accepted 05 Sep 2014, Published online: 05 May 2015

References

  • Anderson, B., and C. McFarlane. 2011. “Assemblage and Geography.” Area 43 (2): 124–127. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x.
  • Aretxaga, B. 2003. “Maddening States.” Annual Review of Anthropology 32 (1): 393–410. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093341.
  • Beekers, W. 2012. Het bewoonbare land: Geschiedenis van de volkshuisvestingsbeweging in Nederland. Amsterdam: Boom.
  • Blessing, A. 2012. “Magical or Monstrous? Hybridity in Social Housing Governance.” Housing Studies 27 (2): 189–207. doi:10.1080/02673037.2012.649469.
  • Burger, A., and P. Dekker. 2001. Noch markt, noch staat: De Nederlandse non-profitsector in vergelijkend perspectief. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  • de Jong, R. 2013. De balans verstoord. Een rapport over de corporatiesector ten behoeve van de Parlementaire Enquête woningcorporaties. Den Haag: Aedes.
  • de Koning, A. 2015. “Citizenship Agendas for the Abject: The Production of Distrust in Amsterdam's Youth and Security Domain.” Citizenship Studies 19 (2): 155–168.
  • de Koning, A., R. Jaffe, and M. Koster. 2015. “Citizenship Agendas in and beyond the Nation State: (En)countering Framings of the Good Citizen.” Citizenship Studies 19 (2): 121–127.
  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. [1987] 2013. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Dovey, K. 2012. “Informal Urbanism and Complex Adaptive Assemblage.” International Development Planning Review 34 (4): 349–368. doi:10.3828/idpr.2012.23.
  • Feldman, I. 2007. “Difficult Distinctions: Refugee Law, Humanitarian Practice, and Political Identification in Gaza.” Cultural Anthropology 22 (1): 129–169. doi:10.1525/can.2007.22.1.129.
  • Flint, J., and J. Nixon. 2006. “Governing Neighbours: Anti-Social Behaviour Orders and New Forms of Regulating Conduct in the UK.” Urban Studies 43 (5–6): 939–955.
  • Foucault, M. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller, 87–104. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gordon, A., and T. Stack. 2007. “Citizenship beyond the State.” Special issue of Citizenship Studies 11 (2)
  • Helderman, J. K., and T. Brandsen. 2011. “De woningcorporatie: Exile on Mainst.? De hybride positie, tussen markt, overheid en gemeenschap, maakt corporaties weliswaar kwetsbaar, maar bovenal veerkrachtig.” Rooilijn 44 (3): 164–171.
  • Holston, J. 2011. “Contesting Privilege with Right: The Transformation of Differentiated Citizenship in Brazil.” Citizenship Studies 15 (3–4): 336–352.
  • Hurenkamp, M., E. Tonkens, and J. W. Duyvendak. 2011. “Citizenship in the Netherlands: Locally Produced, Nationally Contested.” Citizenship Studies 15 (2): 205–225. doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.549716.
  • Jaffe, R. 2013. “The Hybrid State: Crime and Citizenship in Urban Jamaica.” American Ethnologist 40 (4): 734–748. doi:10.1111/amet.12051.
  • Jaffe, R. 2015. “Between Ballots and Bullets: Elections and Citizenship in and beyond the Nation State.” Citizenship Studies 19 (2): 128–140.
  • Kabeer, N., ed. 2005. Inclusive Citizenship: Meanings and Expressions. London: Zed Books.
  • Kingfisher, C., and J. Maskovsky. 2008. “Introduction: The Limits of Neoliberalism.” Critique of Anthropology 28 (2): 115–126. doi:10.1177/0308275X08090544.
  • Kokx, A., and R. van Kempen. 2010. “Dutch Urban Governance: Multi-Level or Multi-Scalar?” European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (4): 355–369. doi:10.1177/0969776409350691.
  • Koster, M. 2012. “Mediating and Getting Burnt in the Gap: Politics and Brokerage in a Recife Slum, Brazil.” Critique of Anthropology 32 (4): 479–497. doi:10.1177/0308275X12456643.
  • Laan, E. van der. 2009. “Kabinetsstandpunt over voorstellen woningcorporatiestelsel.” June 12. http://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/brieven_regering/detail.jsp?id = 2009Z11224&did = 2009D29536.
  • Larner, W., and W. Walters. 2000. “Privatisation, Governance and Identity: The United Kingdom and New Zealand Compared.” Policy & Politics 28 (3): 361–377. doi:10.1332/0305573002501027.
  • Lazar, S. 2008. El Alto, Rebel City: Self and Citizenship in Andean Bolivia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Lazar, S. 2012. “Disjunctive Comparison: Citizenship and Trade Unionism in Bolivia and Argentina.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18 (2): 349–368. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2012.01747.x.
  • Lund, C. 2006. “Twilight Institutions: An Introduction.” Development and Change 37 (4): 673–684. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00496.x.
  • Manzi, T. 2010. “Promoting Responsibility, Shaping Behaviour: Housing Management, Mixed Communities and the Construction of Citizenship.” Housing Studies 25 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/02673030903363462.
  • Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  • McFarlane, C. 2011a. “The City as Assemblage: Dwelling and Urban Space.” Environment and Planning: Society and Space 29 (4): 649–671. doi:10.1068/d4710.
  • McFarlane, C. 2011b. Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • McIntyre, Z., and K. McKee. 2012. “Creating Sustainable Communities through Tenure-Mix: The Responsibilisation of Marginal Homeowners in Scotland.” GeoJournal 77 (2): 235–247. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9322-5.
  • Mitros. 2014. Accessed July 3, 2014. http://mitros.nl/wijken/wijken-utrecht/overvecht/.
  • Municipality of Utrecht. 2002. Visie Wonen 2030. Utrecht: Gemeente Utrecht, Dienst Stadsontwikkeling.
  • Municipality of Utrecht. 2010a. Wonen in een sterke stad: Woonvisie 2009–2019. Utrecht: Gemeente Utrecht.
  • Municipality of Utrecht. 2010b. SPvE Maria van Hongarijedreef. Utrecht: Gemeente Utrecht.
  • Murray Li, T. 2007. “Practices of Assemblage and Community Forest Management.” Economy and Society 36 (2): 263–293. doi:10.1080/03085140701254308.
  • Newman, J., and E. Tonkens. 2011. Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Nouws, H. 2011. Een spannend huwelijk: faciliteren van particulier initiatief in de zorg door gemeenten, woningcorporaties en zorgaanbieders. Utrecht: Provincie Utrecht & Aedes-Actiz Kenniscentrum Wonen-Zorg.
  • NRC next. 2012. “Van de redactie.” February 2.
  • Nuijten, M. 2013. “The Perversity of the ‘Citizenship Game’: Slum-Upgrading in the Urban Periphery of Recife, Brazil.” Critique of Anthropology 33 (1): 8–25. doi:10.1177/0308275X12466683.
  • Ong, A. 2000. “Graduated Sovereignty in South-East Asia.” Theory, Culture & Society 17 (4): 55–75. doi:10.1177/02632760022051310.
  • Osborne, T., and N. Rose. 1999. “Governing Cities: Notes on the Spatialisation of Virtue.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 17 (6): 737–760. doi:10.1068/d170737.
  • Phillips, J. 2006. “Agencement/Assemblage.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2–3): 108–109.
  • Pinkster, F. M. 2009. “Neighborhood-Based Networks, Social Resources, and Labor Market Participation in Two Dutch Neighborhoods.” Journal of Urban Affairs 31 (2): 213–231. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00442.x.
  • Priemus, H. 2008. “Real Estate Investors and Housing Associations: A Level Playing Field? The Dutch Case.” European Journal of Housing Policy 8 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1080/14616710701817174.
  • Ruys, P. H., J. Bruil, and H. Dix. 2007. “Modes of Governance in the Dutch Social Housing Sector.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 78 (3): 381–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2007.00339.x.
  • Sansi, R. 2013. “Encountering Images in Candomblé.” Visual Anthropology 26 (1): 18–33. doi:10.1080/08949468.2013.735175.
  • Sassen, S. 2008. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schinkel, W. 2010. “The Virtualization of Citizenship.” Critical Sociology 36 (2): 265–283. doi:10.1177/0896920509357506.
  • Schinkel, W., and M. van den Berg. 2011. “City of Exception: The Dutch Revanchist City and the Urban Homo Sacer.” Antipode 43 (5): 1911–1938. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00831.x.
  • Schinkel, W., and F. van Houdt. 2010. “The Double Helix of Cultural Assimilationism and Neo-Liberalism: Citizenship in Contemporary Governmentality.” The British Journal of Sociology 61 (4): 696–715. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01337.x.
  • Sharp, E. 2015. “Vigilantes, Gangsters and Alcohol: Clashing Citizenship Regimes in Postwar Guatemala.” Citizenship Studies 19 (2): 199–212.
  • Smets, P., and T. Salman. 2008. “Countering Urban Segregation: Theoretical and Policy Innovations from around the Globe.” Special issue of Urban Studies 45 (7): 1307–1332. doi:10.1177/0042098008090676.
  • Swyngedouw, E. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006. doi:10.1080/00420980500279869.
  • Turner, B. S. 1990. “Outline of a Theory of Citizenship.” Sociology 24 (2): 189–217. doi:10.1177/0038038590024002002.
  • Uitermark, J. 2005. “The Genesis and Evolution of Urban Policy: A Confrontation of Regulationist and Governmentality Approaches.” Political Geography 24 (2): 137–163. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.07.009.
  • Uitermark, J. 2009. “An in Memoriam for the Just City of Amsterdam.” City 13 (2–3): 347–361.
  • Uitermark, J., U. Rossi, and H. van Houtum. 2005. “Reinventing Multiculturalism: Urban Citizenship and the Negotiation of Ethnic Diversity in Amsterdam.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (3): 622–640. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00614.x.
  • van Eijk, G.. 2010. Unequal Networks: Spatial Segregation, Relationships and Inequality in the City. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • van Hulst, M., L. de Graaf, and G. van den Brink. 2012. “The Work of Exemplary Practitioners in Neighborhood Governance.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 434–451. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.730763.
  • van Kempen, R., and G. Bolt. 2009. “Social Cohesion, Social Mix, and Urban Policies in the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24 (4): 457–475. doi:10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1.
  • Vermeer, O., and J. Wester. 2012. “Hoe kreeg Vestia zó snel zulke problemen.” NRC Handelsblad, February 1.
  • Visitatiecommissie Wijkenaanpak. 2011. Toekomst van de wijkenaanpak: doorzetten en loslaten (Deel 1). Breda: Koninklijke Broese en Peereboom.
  • von Benda-Beckmann, F., K. von Benda-Beckmann, and M. G. Wiber, eds. 2006. Changing Properties of Property. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  • VROM (Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer). 1997. Nota Stedelijke Vernieuwing. Den Haag: VROM.
  • VROM (Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer). 2009. Buurtbewoners in Balans. Den Haag: VROM.
  • VROM-raad. 2006. Stad en stijging: sociale stijging als leidraad voor stedelijke vernieuwing. Den Haag: VROM-raad.
  • Wise, J. 2005. “Assemblage.” In Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts, edited by C. Stivale, 77–87. Chesham: Acumen.
  • Wittebrood, K., M. Permentier, and F. M. Pinkster. 2011. Wonen, wijken en interventies: Krachtwijkenbeleid in perspectief. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  • WRR (Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid). 2004. Bewijzen van goede dienstverlening. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.