950
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Knowledge and legitimacy in asylum decision-making: the politics of country of origin information

& ORCID Icon
Pages 663-679 | Received 15 Jul 2019, Accepted 28 Jan 2020, Published online: 24 Jun 2020

References

  • ARC [Asylum Research Centre], and DCR [Dutch Council for Refugees]. 2019. “Comments on the EASO Country of Origin Information Report: Eritrea National Service, Exit and Return, September 2019.” https://asylumresearchcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ARC_and_DCR_comments_on_the_EASO_Country_of_Origin_Information_Report_on_Eritrea__Dec_2019_Final_version-1.pdf
  • Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: Athlone Press.
  • Barry, A. 2002. “The Anti-Political Economy.” Economy and Society 31 (2): 268–284. doi:10.1080/03085140220123162.
  • Barry, A., and G. Born. 2013. Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. London: Routledge.
  • Boswell, C. 2008. “The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge: Knowledge and Legitimation in European Union Immigration Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 15: 471–488. doi:10.1080/13501760801996634.
  • Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chimni, B. S. 2004. “From Resettlement to Involuntary Repartriation: Towards a Critical History of Durable Solutions to Refugee Problems.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 23 (3): 55–73. doi:10.1093/rsq/23.3.55.
  • Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235–296. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003.
  • Dijstelbloem, H., and D. Broeders. 2015. “Border Surveillance, Mobility Management and the Shaping of Non-Publics in Europe.” European Journal of Social Theory May 18 (1): 21–38. doi:10.1177/1368431014534353.
  • EASO [European Asylum Support Office]. 2012. “EASO Consultative Forum Operational Plan.” https://www.easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/Consultative-Forum-Operational-Plan.pdf
  • EASO [European Asylum Support Office]. 2014a. “Tools and Tips for Online COI Research.” https://coi.easo.europa.eu/administration/easo/PLib/EASO-Tools-and-tips-for-online-COI-research2.pdf
  • EASO [European Asylum Support Office]. 2014b. “Consultative Forum Breakout Session: Producing and Sharing EU-Level COI.” https://easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/CF-Break-out-COI-concept-paper_xiv.pdf
  • EASO [European Asylum Support Office]. 2019. “EASO Country of Origin Information (COI) Report Methodology” https://coi.easo.europa.eu/administration/easo/PLib/2019_EASO_COI_Report_Methodology.pdf
  • Engelmann, C. 2015. “Common Standards via the Backdoor: The Domestic Impact of Asylum Policy Coordination in the European Union.” PhD diss., Maastricht University.
  • Eule, T. G., L. M. Borrelli, A. Lindberg, and A. Wyss. 2018. Migrants before the Law: Contested Migration Control in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macillan.
  • Fassin, D. 2011. “Policing Borders, Producing Boundaries. The Governmentality of Immigration in Dark Times.” Annual Review of Anthropology 40: 213–226. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145847.
  • Fassin, D., and E. d’Halluin. 2005. “The Truth from the Body: Medical Certificates as Ultimate Evidence for Asylum Seekers.” American Anthropologist 107 (4): 597–608. doi:10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.597.
  • Geiger, M., and A. Pécoud. 2010. “The Politics of International Migration Management.” In The Politics of International Migration Management, edited by M. Geiger and A. Pécoud, 1–20. London: Palgrave Macillan.
  • Gibb, R., and A. Good. 2013. “Do the Facts Speak for Themselves? Country of Origin Information in French and British Refugee Status Determination Procedures.” International Journal of Refugee Law 25 (2): 291–322. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eet015.
  • Gibb, R., and A. Good. 2014. “Interpretation, Translation and Intercultural Communication in Refugee Status Determination Procedures in the UK and France.” Language and Intercultural Communication 14 (3): 385–399. doi:10.1080/14708477.2014.918314.
  • Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Gilbert, G. N., and M. Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y: Doubleday.
  • Goodwin-Gill, G. S. 2015. “Regulating ‘Irregular’ Migration: International Obligations and International Responsibilities.” Notes for a Keynote Address. in International Workshop at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Faculty of Law, Athens, March 20.
  • Guild, E. 2016. “Does the EU Need a European Migration and Protection Agency?” International Journal of Refugee Law 28 (4): 585–600. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eew038.
  • Haraway, D. J. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.
  • Harding, S. 2008. Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Harvey, P., M. Reeves, and E. Ruppert. 2012. “Anticipating Failure.” Journal of Cultural Economy 6 (3): 294–312. doi:10.1080/17530350.2012.739973.
  • Hatton, J. 2018. “MARS Attacks. A Cautionary Tale from the UK on the Relation between Migration and Refugee Studies (MARS) and Migration Control”. Movements Journal 4 (1).
  • Held, D., and M. Koenig-Archibugi. 2005. Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hilgartner, S. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ICIBI [Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration]. 2017. “An Inspection of the Home Office’s Production and Use of Country of Origin Information.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/677556/An_inspection_of_the_production_and_use_of_Country_of_Origin_Information.pdf
  • Isin, E. F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 15–43. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Jasanoff, S. 2011. “The Practices of Objectivity in Regulatory Science.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by C. Camic, N. Gross, and M. Lamont, 307–338. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lascoumes, P., and P. Le Galès. 2007. “Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—from the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.” Governance 20 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x.
  • Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lawrance, B. N., and G. Ruffer. 2015. Adjudicating Refugee and Asylum Status. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lezaun, J, and L. Soneryd. 2007. “Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (3): 279–297. doi:10.1177/0963662507079371.
  • Liodden, T. M. 2019. “Making the Right Decision: Justice in the Asylum Bureaucracy in Norway.” In Asylum Determination in Europe, edited by N. Gill and A. Good, 241–262. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Malkki, L. H. 1995. “Refugees and Exile: From 'Refugee Studies' to the National Order of Things.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 495–523. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431.
  • Marres, N., and J. Lezaun. 2011. “Materials and Devices of the Public: An Introduction.” Economy and Society 40 (4): 489–509. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.602293.
  • Mayblin, L. 2016. “Troubling the Exclusive Privileges of Citizenship: Mobile Solidarities, Asylum Seekers, and the Right to Work.” Citizenship Studies 20 (2): 192–207. doi:10.1080/13621025.2015.1132570
  • Mitchell, T. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Norwegian Organisation for Asylum Seekers (NOAS). 2017. “Tro, Håp Og Forfølgelse II. Har Kristne Konvertitter Fra Iran Behov for Beskyttelse? [Faith, Hope and Persecution II. Do Christian Converts from Iran Need Protection?].” https://www.noas.no/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Tro-haap-og-forfolgelse-II.pdf
  • Pelizza, A. 2020. “Processing Alterity, Enacting Europe: Migrant Registration and Identification as Co-Construction of Individuals and Polities.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (2): 262-284. doi:10.1177/0162243919827927.
  • Petterson, D. 2006. “Ny Åpenhet Om Landkunnskap [New Openness About Country Knowledge].” Dagbladet, June 1. www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2006/06/01/467766.html
  • Rosset, D. 2019. “‘We Have Our Own Kitchen’: Distance Et Légitimité Dans La Production De Savoir Pour La Procédure D’asile [‘We Have Our Own Kitchen’: Distance and Legitimacy in the Production of Knowledge for the Asylum Procedure].”.” Politique et Sociétés 38 (1): 49–69. doi:10.7202/1058290ar.
  • Rosset, D., and C. Achermann. 2019. “Negotiating Research in the Shadow of Migration Control: Access, Knowledge, and Cognitive Authority.” Social Anthropology 27 (S1): 49–67. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12644.
  • Ruppert, E. 2018. Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Different Data Futures: An Experiment in Citizen Data. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  • Scheel, S., E. Ruppert, and F. Ustek-Spilda. 2019. “Enacting Migration through Data Practices.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (4): 579–588. doi:10.1177/0263775819865791.
  • Shapin, S. 1984. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology.” Social Studies of Science 14 (4): 481–520. doi:10.1177/030631284014004001.
  • Stark, L. 2012. “Meeting by the Minute(s): How Documents Create Decisions for Institutional Review Boards.” In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by C. Camic, N. Gross, and M. Lamont, 233–256. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Strathern, M. 2000. “The Tyranny of Transparency.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (3): 309–321. doi:10.1080/713651562.
  • Thomas, R. 2007. “Risk, Legitimacy and Asylum Adjudication.” Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 58: 49–77.
  • UKHO [United Kingdom Home Office]. 2015a. “Country Information and Guidance Eritrea: National (Incl. Military) Service.” http://www.refworld.org/docid/552779c34.html
  • UKHO [United Kingdom Home Office]. 2015b. “Country Information and Guidance Eritrea: Illegal Exit.” http://www.refworld.org/docid/5507fe424.html
  • van der Kist, J., H. Dijstelbloem, and M. de Goede. 2019. “In the Shadow of Asylum Decision-Making: The Knowledge Politics of Country-of-Origin Information.” International Political Sociology 13 (1): 68–85. doi:10.1093/ips/oly029.
  • Walters, W. 2010. “Foucault and Frontiers: Notes on the Birth of the Humanitarian Border.” In Governmentality. Current Issues and Future Challenges, edited by U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, and T. Lemke, 146–172. London: Routledge.
  • Walters, W. 2015. “Reflections on Migration and Governmentality.” Movements: Journal Für Kritische Migrations- Und Grenzregimeforschung 1 (1): 1–25.
  • Waterton, C., and B. Wynne. 2004. “Knowledge and Political Order in the European Environment Agency.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, edited by S. Jasanoff, 87–108. London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.