Everyday discourse as a space of citizenship: the linguistic construction of in-groups and out-groups in online discussion boards

References

• Abdelgadir, A., and V. Fouka. 2020. “Political Secularism and Muslim Integration in the West: Assessing the Effects of the French Headscarf Ban.” American Political Science Review 114 (3): 707–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamec, L. 2009. Historical Dictionary of Islam. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alicino, F. 2016. “Freedom of Expression, Laïcité and Islam in France: The Tension between Two Different (Universal) Perspectives.” Islam & Christian–Muslim Relations 27 (1): 51–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2015.1090105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombre, J.-C. 1995. “La théorie des topoï. Sémantique ou rhétorique?” [The Theory of Topoi: Semantics or Rhetoric?].” Hermès, La Revue 15 (1): 185–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/15167.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, T. 2013. “Free Speech, Blasphemy, and Secular Criticism.” In Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech, edited by T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, and S. Mahmood, 14–57. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955, Edited by J. O. Urmson and S. Marina Sbisà. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baider, F., S. Millar, and S. Assimakopoulos. 2020. “Introduction: Defining, Performing and Countering Hate Speech.” Pragmatics and Society 11 (2): 171–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00030.edi.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, É. 2002. “World Borders, Political Borders.” PMLA 117 (1): 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, É. 2018. Secularism and Cosmopolitanism: Critical Hypotheses on Religion and Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., and P. Koch. 2019. “Urban Everyday Politics: Politicising Practices and the Transformation of the Here and Now.” Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space 37 (1): 142–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818805487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. 1991. “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation.” In Nation and Narration, edited by H. Bhabha, 291–322. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. 2006. “How Legitimate Is My Voice? A Rejoinder.” Target 18 (1): 163–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18.1.09blo.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, J. R. 2010. Why the French Don’t like Headscarves: Islam, the State, and Public Space. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caglar, A. 2015. “Citizenship, Anthropology of”. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd. Vol. 3. 637–641. Amsterdam : Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12180-4.
   Google Scholar
• DDO = Den Danske Ordbog [The Danish Dictionary]. Online version. Accessed August 1, 2021. https://ordnet.dk/ddo/
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1988. Limited Inc. Translated by Samuel Weber and Jeffrey Mehlman: Edited by Gerald Graff. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York:Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, D. C. 2016. “Observing Real-World Groups in the Virtual Field: The Analysis of Online Discussion.” British Journal of Social Psychology 55: 484–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1977. “The Work of Representation.” In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, edited by S. Hall, 13–64. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heinze, A.-S. 2018. “Strategies of Mainstream Parties Towards Their Right-Wing Populist Challengers: Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Finland in Comparison.” West European Politics 41 (2): 287–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1389440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, M., S. Pietikäinen, and J. Pujolar, eds. 2017. Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods: Studying Language Issues that Matter. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F., and G. M. Nielsen. 2008. “Introduction.” In Acts of Citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen, 1‒12. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, L. 2006. “Zero Person in Finnish: A Grammatical Resource for Construing Human Reference.” In Grammar from the Human Perspective: Case, Space and Person in Finnish, edited by M.-L. Helasvuo and L. Campbell, 209–231. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S. 2015. “‘This Is Not a Parade, It’s a Protest March’: Intertextuality, Citation, and Political Action on the Streets of Bolivia and Argentina.” American Anthropologist 117 (2): 242–256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12227.
   Google Scholar
• Määttä, S., K. Suomalainen, and U. Tuomarla. 2020. “Maahanmuuttovastaisen ideologian ja ryhmäidentiteetin rakentuminen Suomi24-keskustelussa” [Constructing Anti-immigration Ideology and Group Identity in an Online Conversation Thread on the Suomi24 Discussion Board]. Virittäjä 124 (2): 190–216.
   Google Scholar
• Maestri, G., and S. M. Hughes. 2017. “Contested Spaces of Citizenship: Camps, Borders and Urban Encounters.” Citizenship Studies 21 (6): 39‒625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2017.1341657.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. 2009. “Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?” Critical Inquiry 35 (4): 836–862. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/599592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. 2016. Religious Difference in A Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maingueneau, D. 1991. L’analyse du discours. Introduction aux études de l’archive [Discourse Analysis: Introduction to the Study of the Archive]. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Matamoros-Fernández, A., and J. Farkas. 2021. “Racism, Hate Speech, and Social Media: A Systematic Review and Critique.” Television & New Media 22 (2): 24‒205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Najib, K., and P. Hopkins. 2019. “Veiled Muslim Women’s Strategies in Response to Islamophobia in Paris.” Political Geography 73: 103–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascale, C.-M. 2019. “The Weaponization of Language: Discourses of Rising Right-Wing Authoritarianism.” Current Sociology 67 (6): 898–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119869963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puumala, E., and M. Karim. 2021. “Whether You like It or Not, This Is the Future!’: Everyday Negotiations of the Community’s Boundary in Urban Space.” Citizenship Studies 25: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Puumala, E., and R. Shindo. 2021. “Introduction: Exploring the Links between Community, Everyday Citizenship, and Language.” Citizenship Studies 25: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Pye, M. 1993. “MacMillan Dictionary of Religion”. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Accessed August 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Reynié, D. 2016. “‘Heritage Populism’ and France’s National Front.” Journal of Democracy 27 (4): 47–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2016.0061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shindo, R. 2019. Belonging in Translation: Solidarity and Migrant Activism in Japan. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, P. 1993. Language, Ideology, and Point of View. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. 2006. “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies 11 (2): 115–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen, M. T., and L. Kääntä. 2018. “At the Intersection of Text and Conversation Analysis: Analysing Asynchronous Online Written Interaction.” AFinLA-e 11: 137–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.30660/afinla.69081.
   Google Scholar
• WikiIslam. 2019. “Allahu Akbar.” https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Allahu_Akbar ( 16.2.2019). Accessed August 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 63–99. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar