Nuclear-enmeshed Australia: an obstacle to nuclear weapons eradication

References

• Beazley, Kim. 1997. Presentation to Seminar on the ANZUS Alliance, Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, Parliament of Australia, August 11.
   Google Scholar
• Beljac, Marko, Tilman A. Ruff, Jim Falk, Joseph Camilleri, David Noonan, Dimity Hawkins, and Jim Green. An Illusion of Protection: The Unavoidable Limitations of Safeguards on Nuclear Materials and the Export of Uranium to China. Melbourne: Australian Conservation Foundation and Medical Association for Prevention of War (Australia). Accessed May 29, 2014. http://www.mapw.org.au/files/downloads/iIlusion_of_protection_full3.5MB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence. 2009. Defence White Paper 2009: Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific Century: Force 2030. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defence. 2013. Defence White Paper 2013. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Dibb, Paul. 2005. “America has Always Kept Us in the Loop.” The Australian, September 10.
   Google Scholar
• Flitton, Daniel. 2011. “Anti-nuclear Rudd Urged US to Keep Arsenal for Deterrence.” The Age, November 14.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, Robert, Director-General, Australian Safeguards and Non-proliferation Office. 2011. Testimony before Joint Standing Committee on Treaties. Canberra: Hansard. October 31: 9.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Malcolm, and Cain Roberts. 2014. Dangerous Allies. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Jim. 2010. Uranium, India and the Fracturing Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime. Energy Science Coalition Briefing Paper No. 18, October. Accessed May 30, 2014. http://energyscience.org.au/BP18India.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green, Jim and Dave Sweeney. 2013. Yellowcake Fever: Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths. Melbourne: Australian Conservation Foundation. Accessed May 29, 2014. http://www.acfonline.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/ACF_Yellowcake_Fever.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gun, Richard, Jacqueline Parsons, Philip Ryan, Philip Crouch, and Janet Hiller. 2006. Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests in Australia. Vol 2: Mortality and Cancer Incidence. Canberra: Department of Veterans Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Gun, R. T., J. Parsons, P. Crouch, P. Ryan, and J. E. Hiller. 2008. “Mortality and Cancer Incidence of Australian Participants in the British Nuclear Tests in Australia.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine 65 (12): 843–848.10.1136/oem.2007.034652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymans, Jacques E. C. 2000. “Isotopes and Identity: Australia and the Nuclear Weapons Option, 1949–1999.” The Nonproliferation Review Spring 7 (1): 1–23. Accessed May 30, 2014. http://cns.miis.edu/npr/pdfs/hym71.pdf10.1080/10736700008436791
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, H. M., and Robert S. Norris. 2013. “Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2013.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 69 (6): 79–85. doi:10.1177/009634021350863210.1177/0096340213508632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudd, Gavin M. 2014. “The Future of Yellowcake: A Global Assessment of Uranium Resources and Mining.” Science of the Total Environment 472: 590–607.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Secretary of Defense. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2013. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense. Accessed May 30, 2014. http://www.defense.gov/pubs/2013_china_report_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, Air Vice Marshall W. E. Danger Area, 19.11.56, GRA/TS.1008/1/Air; and minutes 27.11.56 Top Secret – UK Eyes Only XY/181/024.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Alan. 2002. “Maralinga: The Clean-up of a Nuclear Test Site.” Medicine & Global Survival 7 (2): 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Alan. 2004. “The Maralinga Rehabilitation Project: Final Report.” Medicine, Conflict and Survival 20 (1): 70–80. doi:10.1080/1362369041233130230410.1080/13623690412331302304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, Dennis. 2009. Presentation to the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Policy of the United States, Submission to the United States Nuclear Posture Review 2009, Ministerial Submission, Approved 23 February 2009, Attachment C, A640 11973. Released under Freedom of Information Request 357/10/11.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Commission. 1985. The Report of the Royal Commission into British Nuclear Tests in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ruff, T. A. 2006. “ Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests in Australia.” Submission to: Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. October 27. Accessed May 29, 2014. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Foreign_Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/Completed%20inquiries/2004-07/nuclear_tests_bills_06/submissions/sublist
   Google Scholar
• Slakey, Francis, and Linda Cohen. 2010. “NRC Should Perform Non-proliferation Assessment of Laser Enrichment Technology.” Forum on Physics & Society. American Physical Society. Accessed May 30, 2014. http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/201007/slakey.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Tame, Adrian, and F. P. J. Robotham. 1982. Maralinga: British A-Bomb Australian Legacy. Melbourne: Fontana/Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, Richard. 2011. “Just in Case: Extended Nuclear Deterrence in the Defense of Australia.” Pacific Focus 26 (1): 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, Richard. 2012. The “Joint Facilities” Revisited – Desmond Ball, Democratic Debate on Security, and the Human Interest. Nautlius Institute for Security and Sustainability Special Report, December 12. Accessed May 30, 2014. http://nautilus.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/The-_Joint-Facilities_-revisited-1000-8-December-2012-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, Richard. 2013a. “Absurd, Obscene and Reckless – American Nuclear Weapons in the Defence of Australia.” Dissent Spring 2013 (42): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Tanter, Richard. 2013b. “The US Military Presence in Australia: Asymmetrical Alliance Cooperation and its Alternatives.” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 11 (45) No. 1, November 11.
   Google Scholar