References
- Asada, M. 2011. “The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the Universalization of the Additional Protocol.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 16 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krr007.
- Blair, T. 2006. Oral Answers to Questions. Hansard, UK Parliament. London, December 4.
- Borrie, J., and T. Caughley. 2013. After Oslo: Humanitarian Perspectives and the Changing Nuclear Weapons Discourse. Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons Project Paper 3. UN Institute for Disarmament Research.
- Bowen, W., M. Moran, and D. Esfandiary. 2016. Living on the Edge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Brazil. 1967. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee, December 14.
- Brende, B. [Foreign Minister of Norway]. 2016. Reply to Written Question in Parliament. Oslo, November 1. https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Sporsmal/Skriftlige-sporsmal-og-svar/Skriftlig-sporsmal/?qid=66945.
- Canada. 2016. Statement to the 2016 Open-Ended Working Group Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations. Geneva, August 5. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/OEWG/2016/Statements/5Aug_Canada.pdf.
- Craig, C., and J. Ruzicka. 2012. “Who’s In, Who’s Out?” London Review of Books 34 (4): 37–38.
- Dunworth, T. 2015. “Pursuing “Effective Measures” Relating to Nuclear Disarmament.” International Review of the Red Cross 97 (899): 601–619. doi:10.1017/S1816383116000151.
- Egeland, K. 2016. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament.” Peace Review 28 (3): 318–325. doi:10.1080/10402659.2016.1201947.
- Egeland, K. 2017. “How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Embrace Diplomatic “Polarization”.” Peace Review 29 (4): 482–488. doi:10.1080/10402659.2017.1381520.
- Egeland, K. 2018. “Banning the Bomb: Inconsequential Posturing or Meaningful Stigmatization?” Global Governance 24 (1): 11–20.
- Einhorn, R. 2017. Non-Proliferation Challenges Facing the Trump Administration. Arms Control and Non-Proliferation Series 15 Brookings. March. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/acnpi_201703_nonproliferation_challenges_v2.pdf
- Fehl, C. 2015. “Understanding the Puzzle of Unequal Recognition.” In Recognition in International Relations, edited by C. Daase, C. Fehl, A. Geis, and G. Kolliarakis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- France. 2016. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 4. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com16/statements/5Oct_France.pdf.
- Gavin, F. J. 2012. Nuclear Statecraft. New York: Cornell University Press.
- Germany. 2016a. Statement to the 2016 Open-Ended Working Group Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiation. Geneva, February 24. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/OEWG/2016/Statements/25Feb_Germany.pdf.
- Germany. 2016b. Statement to the Open-Ended Working Group Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations. Geneva, August 5. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/OEWG/2016/Statements/05August_Germany.pdf.
- Highsmith, N., and M. Stewart. 2018. “The Nuclear Ban Treaty: A Legal Analysis.” Survival 60 (1): 129–152. doi:10.1080/00396338.2018.1427371.
- Hymans, J. E. C. 2006. “Theories of Nuclear Proliferation.” Nonproliferation Review 13 (3): 455–465. doi:10.1080/10736700601071397.
- International Court of Justice. 1996. Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Advisory Opinion. July 8. The Hague: International Court of Justice.
- Japan. 2016a. Explanation of Vote at the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 27. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com16/eov/L41_Japan.pdf.
- Japan. 2016b. Statement to the Open-Ended Working Group Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations. Geneva, February 24. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/OEWG/2016/Statements/24Feb_Japan.pdf.
- Jaramillo, C. 2015. NPT Review Conference: No Outcome Document Better than a Weak One. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, June 3. http://thebulletin.org/npt-review-conference-no-outcome-document-better-weak-one8366.
- Johnson, L. B. 1968. Remarks at the Signing of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. July 1. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=28970. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1105114.
- Johnson, R. 2009. Unfinished Business: The Negotiation of the CTBT and the End of Nuclear Testing. Geneva: UN Institute for Disarmament Research.
- Joyner, D. H. 2011. Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kiernan, P. M. 2013. ““Disarmament” under the NPT.” Michigan State International Law Review 20 (2): 381–400.
- Kmentt, A. 2015. “The Development of the International Initiative on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons and It’s Effect on the Nuclear Weapons Debate.” International Review of the Red Cross 97 (899): 681–709. doi:10.1017/S1816383116000059.
- Krasner, S. D. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences.” International Organization 36 (2): 185–205. doi:10.1017/S0020818300018920.
- Krutzsch, W. 2014. “Article 1: General Obligations.” In A Commentary on the Chemical Weapons Convention, edited by W. Krutzsch, E. Myjer, and R. Trapp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- MacKenzie, D. 2017. Nations of the World Agree to Ban Nuclear Weapons – Now What? New Scientist, July 12. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2140450-nations-of-the-world-agree-to-ban-nuclear-weapons-now-what/.
- Mexico. 2017. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 2. http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com17/statements/2Oct_NAC.pdf.
- Minor, E. 2016. “Changing the Discourse on Nuclear Weapons: The Humanitarian Initiative.” International Review of the Red Cross 97 (899): 711–730. doi:10.1017/S181638311600014X.
- Mount, A., and R. Nephew. 2017. “A Nuclear Weapons Ban Should First of All Do No Harm to the NPT.” Bulletin of Atomic Scientists 7 (March): 2017. http://thebulletin.org/nuclear-weapons-ban-should-first-do-no-harm-npt10599.
- Netherlands. 2016. Statement to the Open-Ended Working Group on Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations. Geneva, May 11. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/OEWG/2016/Statements/11May_Netherlands.pdf.
- Nigeria. 2017. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 2. http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com17/statements/2Oct_AfricanGroup.pdf.
- NPT Review Conference. 1995. Decision 2: Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament (NPT/CONF.1995/32 (Part I), Annex). New York, May 11.
- NPT Review Conference. 2010. Final Document of the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT/CONF.2010/50, Vol. I).
- Nystuen, G., and T. G. Hugo. 2014. “The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.” In Nuclear Weapons under International Law, edited by G. Nystuen, S. Casey-Maslen, and A. G. Bersagel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Obama, B. 2009. Remarks by President Barack Obama in Prague as Delivered. Obama White House Archive. Speech delivered in Prague, April 5.
- OEWG. 2016. Report of the Open-Ended Working Group Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations. Geneva. http://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/31F1B64B14E116B2C1257F63003F5453?OpenDocument.
- Pelopidas, B. 2011. “The Oracles of Proliferation: How Experts Maintain a Biased Historical Reading that Limits Policy Innovation.” The Nonproliferation Review 18 (1): 297–314. doi:10.1080/10736700.2011.549185.
- Pelopidas, B. 2014. “Renunciation: Restraint and Rollback.” In Routledge Handbook of Nuclear Proliferation and Policy, edited by J. F. Pilat and N. E. Bush. London: Routledge.
- Poland. 2016. Statement to the Open-Ended Working Group Taking Forward Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations. Geneva, May 12. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/OEWG/2016/Statements/12May_Poland.pdf.
- Poland et al. 2016. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 27. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com16/eov/L41_Poland-etal.pdf.
- Potter, W. C. 2016. “The Unfulfilled Promise of the 2015 NPT Review Conference.” Survival 58 (1): 151–178. doi:10.1080/00396338.2016.1142144.
- Rauf, T. 2000. “Ambassador Abdallah Baali on the 2000 NPT Review Conference.” The Nonproliferation Review 7 (3): 1–9. doi:10.1080/10736700008436821.
- Ritchie, N. 2014. “Waiting for Kant: Devaluing and Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons.” International Affairs 90 (3): 601–623. doi:10.1111/inta.2014.90.issue-3.
- Ritchie, N. 2018. “Inventing Nuclear Disarmament.” Critical Studies on Security.
- Romania. 1967. Statement to the Eighteen Nation Committee on Disarmament. Geneva, August 8. UN doc. ENDC/PV.320.
- Russia. 2016. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 27. UN doc. A/C.1/71/PV.22.
- Salander, H. 2015. Reviewing a Review Conference: Can There Ever Be a Successful NPT RevCon? European Leadership Network, June 8. https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/reviewing-a-review-conference-can-there-ever-be-a-successful-npt-revcon/.
- Sebenius, J. K. 1992. “Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation.” International Organization 46 (1): 324–365. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001521.
- Shaker, M. I. 1980. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origin and Implementation, 1959–1979. Vol. II. London: Oceana.
- Simpson, J. 1991. “The 1990 Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Pointer to the Future or Diplomatic Accident?” The Round Table 80 (318): 139–154. doi:10.1080/00358539108454034.
- Sinovets, P. 2016. Assessing the Ban Treaty from Ukraine. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, December 16. http://thebulletin.org/can-treaty-banning-nuclear-weapons-speed-their-abolition.
- Smith, E. A. 1984. “International Regulation of Chemical and Biological Weapons.” University of Illinois Law Review 4: 1011–1073.
- Sweden. 1968a. Statement to the Eighteen Nation Disarmament Committee. Geneva. February 8. UN doc. ENDC/PV.363.
- Sweden. 1968b. Statement to the Eighteen Nation Disarmament Committee. Geneva, 31 August. UN doc. ENDC/PV.327.
- Sweden. 2017. Statement to the Negotiating Conference of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. New York, July 7. Author’s notes.
- Tannenwald, N. 2013. “Justice and Fairness in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime.” Ethics & International Affairs 27 (3): 299–317. doi:10.1017/S0892679413000221.
- Tarrow, S. 1993. “Cycles of Collective Action: Between Moments of Madness and the Repertoire of Contention.” Social Science History 17 (2): 281–307. doi:10.1017/S0145553200016850.
- Thakur, R. 2017. “The Nuclear Ban Treaty: Recasting a Normative Framework for Disarmament.” Washington Quarterly 40 (4): 71–95. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2017.1406709.
- UN General Assembly. 1961. Resolution 1653 (XVI): Declaration on the Prohibition of the Use of Nuclear and Thermo-Nuclear Weapons. New York: the United Nations.
- UN General Assembly. 1965. Resolution 2028 (XX): Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. New York: the United Nations.
- United Kingdom. 2016. Statement to the NPT Review Conference. New York. May 15. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/npt/revcon2015/statements/15May_UK.pdf
- United States. 2015. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 12. http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com15/statements/12October_USA.pdf.
- United States. 2016. Statement to the UN General Assembly First Committee. New York, October 14. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com16/statements/14Oct_USA.pdf.
- UNOG. 2016. States Respond to Russian Proposals on a Draft Convention for the Suppression of Chemical and Biological Terrorism and on a Programme of Work. August 16. http://unog.ch/unog/website/news_media.nsf/(httpNewsByYear_en)/29A8C553DF0103E3C12580110038F4C1?OpenDocument.
- US Department of Defense. 2018. Nuclear Posture Review. Washington DC, February. https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF.
- Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons. 2014. Humanitarian Pledge. December 9. http://www.icanw.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/HINW14vienna_Pledge_Document.pdf.
- Walker, W. 2000. “Nuclear Order and Disorder.” International Affairs 76 (4): 703–724. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.00160.
- Will, R. C. 2015. The NPT Action Plan Monitoring Report. New York, March. http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Publications/2010-Action-Plan/NPT_Action_Plan_2015.pdf.
- Williams, H. 2017. Does the Fight over Nuclear Weapons Ban Threaten Global Stability? Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, February 9. http://thebulletin.org/does-fight-over-nuclear-weapons-ban-threaten-global-stability10500.
- Wittner Lawrence, S. 1997. Resisting the Bomb: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1954–1970. Stanford, CL: Stanford University Press.
- Wright, T. 2017. Is Australia Violating the Non-Proliferation Treaty? The Interpreter, March 23. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/australia-violating-non-proliferation-treaty.