Factors influencing discontinuation of intrauterine contraceptive devices: an assessment in the Indian context

REFERENCES

• Ramachandran P. Providing family planning: lessons learnt and challenges ahead – India. In Van Look PFA, Perez-Palacios G, eds. Contraceptive Research and Devel- opment 1984 to 1994: The Road from Mexico City to Cairo and Beyond. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994: 291– 303
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri SK. Practice of Fertility Control. A Compre- hensive Textbook. New Delhi: BI Churchill Livingstone, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Hammerslough CR. Characteristics of women who stop using contraception. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1984;16:14–8
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra H, Duran V, et al. The ‘‘boom and bust phenomenon’’: the hopes, dreams and broken promises of the contraceptive revolution. Contraception 2000;61:9–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauldin WP, Nortman D, Stephan FF. Retention of IUCDs: an international comparison. Stud Fam Plann 1967; 18(Suppl):1–12
   Google Scholar
• Ross JA, Germain A, Forrest JE, Van Ginneken J. Findings from family planning research. Rep Population Fam Plann 1972;August:12
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Husband–Wife Communication and Practice of Family Planning. Asian Population Series. Bangkok: United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific 1974: 16
   Google Scholar
• Treadway RC, Gillespie RW, Loghmani M. The model family planning project in Isfahan, Iran. Stud Fam Plann 1976;7:212–19
   Google Scholar
• Sun TH. Demographic evaluation of Taiwan’s family planning programme, Paper presented at the Eighth Summer Seminar in Population, East West Population Institute, Honolulu, June 13–July 3, 1977
   Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics, Indonesia. Principal Report of the Indonesia Fertility Survey (1976). Jakarta: Central Bureau of Statistics, 1978: 1
   Google Scholar
• Laing JE. Effects of Philippines Family Planning Out- reach Project on Contraceptive Prevalence: A multivariate analysis. Stud Fam Plann 1981;12:367–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Boon A. Family planning acceptance, continuation and discontinuation rates and their management: Malaysian experience. Paper presented at the Regional Meeting on Social and Cultural Factors Affecting the Acceptance, Continuation and Discontinuation of Family Planning Practice of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Pataya, Thailand, November 2–8, 1982
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific: Regional Annotated Bibliography of the Studies on Social, Psychological and Cultural Factors Affecting the Acceptance, Continuation and Discontinuation of Family Planning Practice in UNES- CAP: Collected Papers of the Regional Meeting on Social and Cultural Factors Affecting the Acceptance, Continuation and Discontinuation of Family Planning Practice, Pataya, Thailand, November 2–8, 1982
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Hagenfeld K. Contraceptive research and development today: an overview. In Van Look PFA, Perez-Palacios G, eds. Contraceptive Research and Development 1984 to 1994: The Road from Mexico City to Cairo and Beyond. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994:3–23
   Google Scholar
• Bhat PNM, Halli SS. Factors influencing continuation of IUCD use in South India: an evidence from a multivariate analysis. J Bio-soc Sci 1998;30:297–319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekadde-kigondu C, Mwathe EG, Ruminjo JK, et al. Acceptability and discontinuation of Depo-provera, IUCD and combined pill in Kenya. East Afr Med J 1996;73:786–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr G, Amatya R. Contraceptive efficacy of the Copper T 380A and Copper 200 intrauterine devices: results from a comparative clinical trial in six developing countries. Contraception 1994;49:231–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr G, Amatya R, Doh A, et al. An evaluation of the Copper-T 380A IUCDs safety and efficacy at three African centres. Contraception 1996;53:293–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairagi R, Mazharul I, Barua MK. Contraceptive failure: levels, trends and determinants in Matlab, Bangladesh. J Bio-Soc Sci 2000;32:107–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Family Welfare Programme in India, Year Book 1989–90, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Family Welfare. New Delhi: Government of India, 1991
   Google Scholar
• National Family Health Survey [NFHS] (1992–93). Bombay: International Institute for Population Sciences, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Pathak KB. Bio-social aspect of contraceptive use in India. In Sengupta J, Ghosh D, eds. Perspectives in Reproductive Health. Delhi: New Age International, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Rajeshwari NV, Hasalkar JB. IUD retention in Shimoga District of Karnataka. J Fam Welfare India 1996;42:44–50
   Google Scholar
• State of India’s Health. Voluntary Health Association of India (VHAI). New Delhi: VHAI, 1992; Table 6: 206
   Google Scholar
• Kanitkar S, Karandikar I, Salvi M, Soman, A. A prospective study on IUCD acceptors in Pune: does regular follow-up help? J Fam Welfare 1988;35:3–12
   Google Scholar
• Chacko CK, Rajamanickam S, Sethurathiman R. Study on retention rate and reasons for discontinuation of IUD. The Gandhigram Institute of Rural Health and Family Welfare 1990;25:1–13
   Google Scholar
• Rajeshwari NV, Hasalkar JB. IUCD retention in Shimoga District of Karnataka. J Fam Welfare 1996;42:44–50
   Google Scholar
• Das CR, Pradhan G. Study of side-effects of Cu-T as intrauterine contraceptive device in post medical termination of pregnancy and interval cases. J Ind Med Assoc 1995;93:75–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saxena BN. Reproductive health in India. Adv Contra- cept 1996;12:265–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prabhavathi K, Sheshadri A. Pattern of IUD use: a follow-up of acceptors in Mysore. J Fam Welfare 1988;35:3–16
   Google Scholar
• Mulay S, Sanjeevanee, Srikantan KS. A Study of Cu-T Acceptors in Pune, 1985. Pune: Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Bhat PNM, Hasalkar JB. Factors Influencing IUCD Retention in Northern Karnataka. PRC Working Paper No.30. Dharwad: JSS Institute of Economic Research, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee PJ, Rao AN, Gowda HBS. A Study of IUCD Retention in Karnataka. Bangalore: Population Centre, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Gandotra MM, Das NP. Contraceptive choice shift and use continuation: a prospective study. J Fam Welfare 1990;37:54–69
   Google Scholar
• Indian Council of Medical Research. Task Force Study on Psycho-Social Factors Affecting Continuation and Dis- continuation of the Intrauterine Device and Oral Pill in Urban India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Medical Research, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar S, Murali I, et al. A Field Study of IUCD Acceptors in the State of UP. New Delhi: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar S, Murali I, et al. A Field Study of IUCD Acceptors in the State of Maharashtra. New Delhi: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Schaap B. IUD acceptance in rural Madhya Pradesh: results of an acceptors’ interview. J Fam Welfare 1993;9:52–4
   Google Scholar
• Indian Council of Medical Research. Task Force on IUCD and Hormonal Contraceptives. Improved utilization of spacing methods – intrauterine devices (IUCDs) and low-dose combined oral contraceptives (OCs) – through re-orientation training for improving quality of services. Contraception 1994;50:215–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivin I. Contraception and Fertility Change in International Postpartum Programme. New York: The Population Council, 1974
   Google Scholar
• Kreager P. Family Planning Drop-outs Reconsidered. London: International Planned Parenthood Federation, 1977
   Google Scholar
• Wang D. The Determinants of IUCD discontinuation in China: a discrete-time competing. Soc Biol 1996;43:271–89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Population Reports. IUDs – An Update. Series B-6, Population Information Program. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1997
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Contraceptive Methods Mix Guidelines for Policy and Service Delivery. Geneva: WHO, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Phillip JF, Bayan F. In Bulatao RA, ed. Paramedical and Lay Paramedical Prescription of Oral Contraceptives: An Experiment in the Bicol Region. Makati, Rizal: Philippines Population Research, Population Centre Foundation, 1976
   Google Scholar
• Phillips JF. In Hermalin AI, Enwisle B, eds. A Logit Regression Method for the Multivariate Analysis of Contra- ception Attrition. The Role of Surveys in the Analysis of Family Planning Programme. Liege, Belgium: Ordina Editions, 1981:481–536
   Google Scholar
• Rahman SS, Ahmed N, Al-Sabir A, Nessa F. Use effectiveness of oral pill between two delivery systems: clinic versus field worker: PIACT/PATH: Contraceptive Practice in Bangladesh: Safety Issues. Report of the Multi- institutional Contraceptive Research Programme, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Programme for the Introduction and Adaptation of Contraceptive Technology. Dhaka, Bangladesh, November, 1984
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan J, Suyono H, Bahrawi W, Hartoadi A. Contraceptive use effectiveness in Mojokerto Regency, Indonesia: a comparison of a regular programme and special drive acceptors. Stud Fam Plann 1976;7:186–8
   Google Scholar
• Petta CA, Amatya R, Farr G. An analysis of the personal reasons for discontinuing IUCD use. Contraception 1994;50:39–47
   Google Scholar
• Khanna J, Van Look PFA, Griffin PD. Reproductive Health: A key to a Brighter Future, Biennial Report, 1990– 1991. Geneva: WHO, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Sivin I, Stern J. Long-acting more effective copper T IUDs: a summary of US Experience, 1970–1975. Stud Fam Plann 1979;10:1263–81
   Google Scholar
• Sung S. Intrauterine Contraceptive in Tianjin, People’s Republic of China. In Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ, eds. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects (Programme for Applied Research on Fertility Regulation). Hagerstown: Harper and Row, 1984:25–30
   Google Scholar
• Tietze C, Lewit S. Comparison of the Copper-T and Loop D: a research report. Stud Fam Plann 1972;3:277–8
   Google Scholar
• Jain AK. Comparative performance of three types of IUCDs in the United States. In Hefnawi EF, Segal SJ, eds. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intrauterine Contraception, Cairo, Egypt, Dec. 12–14, 1974. North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1975:3–16
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J. Factors associated with copper T IUD removal for bleeding/ pain: a multivariate analysis. Contraception 1993;48:13–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs GT. Intrauterine contraception. In Porter JF, ed. The Control of Human Fertility. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication, 1985:92–102
   Google Scholar
• Farr G, Amatya R, Acosta M, et al. Clinical performance of the TCu380A and Lippes Loop IUCD in three developing countries. Contraception 1995;52:17–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladipo OA. Training of midwives in family planning in Nigeria. Planners Forum 1983;1:5–6
   Google Scholar
• Pastene L, Riveram M, Zipper J, et al. IUCD insertions by midwives: five years’ experience in Santiago, Chile. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1977;15:84–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paxman JM. Role of non-physicians in fertility regulation: an international overview of legal obstacles and solutions. Am J Pub Health 1980;70:31–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieler JM. Discussion: Government Regulatory Agencies and IUCDs. In Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ, eds. Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Philadelphia: Harper and Row, 1985:67–8
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Intrauterine Devices: Their Role in Family Planning Care. Geneva: WHO, 1983: 75
   Google Scholar
• Wright NH, Sujpluem C, Rosenfield AG, Varakamin S. Nurse-midwife insertion of the copper T in Thailand: performance, acceptance, and programmatic effects. Stud Fam Plann 1977;8:237–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar M. An evaluation of IUCD insertion by non- clinical delivery system. Adv Contracept 1992;8:303–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task Force on Intrauterine Devices for Fertility Regulation. Comparative multi- centre trial of three IUDs inserted immediately following delivery of the placenta. Contraception 1980;22:9
   Google Scholar
• Population Reports. Intrauterine Devices. Series B-5. Population Information Program. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AA, DeSilva V. Satisfied IUD acceptors as family planning motivators in Sri Lanka. Stud Fam Plann 1986;17:235–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiry M, Van Der Pas H, Van Kets H. A decade of experience with TCu220. Adv Contracept 1985;1:313–18
   Google Scholar
• Ali M. Quality of care and contraceptive pill disconti- nuation in rural Egypt. J Bio-soc Sci 2001;33:161–72
   Google Scholar
• ORG. Family Planning Practices in India. Second All India Survey. Baroda: Operation Research Group, 1983
   Google Scholar
• Finger WR. Proper IUCD use requires training. Network 1996;16:6–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Hanley K, Huber DH. Postpartum IUCDs: keys for success. Contraception 1992;45:351–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICMR. Task Force on IUDs. Randomised clinical trials with intrauterine devices (levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG) CuT 380 Ag, CuT220C, and CuT200B): a 36-month study. Contraception 1989;39:37–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCC. A Guide to Method of Birth Control. Washington: Population Crisis Committee, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Bongaarts J. The fertility inhibiting effect of the intermediate fertility variables. Paper presented at the seminar on Analysis of Maternity Histories of the Interna- tional Union for the Scientific Study of Population, London, 1980
   Google Scholar
• Vaessen M. Knowledge of Contraceptive Methods. World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies. London: World Fertility Survey, 1980: 8
   Google Scholar
• Grossman RA, Chunmijarakij T, Charunumilind P. A Study of new contraceptive acceptors of pills and iuds at three Bangkok clinics. Contraception 1977;16:67–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JF. Continued use of contraception among Philippine family planning acceptors: a multivariate analysis. Stud Fam Plann 1978;9:182–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A. Mexico City: a clinic drop-out study. Stud Fam Plann 1971;2:192–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller A. Patient attrition in five Mexican City family planning clinics. In Stycos JM, ed. Clinics, Contraception and Communication. New York: Appleton Century- Crafts, 1973
   Google Scholar
• Hieu Ti Van, Donaldson, Le Nga. The pattern of IUCD use in Vietnam. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1995;21:6–10
   Google Scholar
• Snowden R. The IUD: A Woman’s Guide. London: Unwin Paperbacks, 1986
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Evaluation of the Strategy for Health for All by 2000. Seventh Report on the World Health Situation Vol. 1, Global Review. Geneva: WHO, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Andrade AT, Pizarro OE. Quantitative studies on menstrual blood loss in IUCD users. Contraception 1987;36:129–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard RP. IUCD performance patterns- a 1970 worldview. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1970;8:926–40
   Google Scholar
• Newton F. Update on intrauterine device. In Studd J. ed. Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1993;10:247–57
   Google Scholar
• Sivin I, Tatum HJ. Four years of experience with the T Cu 380A intrauterine contraceptive device. Fertil Steril 1981;36:159–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion CB, Behlilovic B, Arosemena JM, et al. A three-year evaluation of T Cu380 A and Multiload Cu 380 Ag and Multiload Cu375 intrauterine devices. Contraception 1991;38:618–19
   Google Scholar
• Cole LP, Potts DM, Aranda C, et al. An evaluation of T Cu 380 Ag and Multiload Cu 375. Fertil Steril 1985;43:214–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sastrawinata S, Farr G, Prihadi ST, et al. A comparative clinical trial of the TCu 380 A, Lippes Loop D and Multiload Cu 375 IUDs in Indonesia. Contraception 1991;44:114–54
   Google Scholar
• De Castro A, Perez-Iglesias R, Vicandi F, et al. Comparison of two copper IUDs. Adv Contracept 1987;3:319–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson J. A randomized trial of Nova T, the MLCu- 375, and the ML Ag Cu250 IUDs: 1 and 2 years results. Adv Contracept 1989;5:23–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bratt H, Skjeldestad FE, Valentin KC. A randomized trial of three copper IUCDs (MLCu-250, MLCu 375 and Nova-T). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67:247– 51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apelo RA, Ramos RM, Bernardo E. A 3-year evaluation of the T CU 380 Ag and Cu-7. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1985;28:269–73
   Google Scholar
• Chi IC. Expulsions in immediate postpartum insertions of Lippes Loop D and Copper T IUDs and their counterpart delta devices – an epidemiological analysis. Contraception 1985;32:119–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi IC, Farr G, Thompson K. Is the T 380 A device associated with an increased risk of removal due to bleeding and/or pain? An analysis. Contraception 1990;42:159–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanback J, Grimes D. Can intrauterine device removals for bleeding or pain be predicted at a one-month follow-up visit? A multivariate analysis. Contraception 1998;58:357–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JF, Chamratrithirong A, Mundigo A. The correlates of continuity in contraceptive use: a review of research needs. In International Population Conference, New Delhi, 1989. Liege: IUSSP, 1989
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Mechanism of Action, Safety and Efficacy of Intrauterine Devices. Technical Report Series. Geneva: WHO, 1987: 753
   Google Scholar
• Luukkainen T. Progestin-releasing intrauterine contra- ceptive device. In Bardin CW, Mishell DR Jr, eds. Proceedings from the 4th International Conference on IUCDs. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994:32–41
   Google Scholar
• Brenner PF, Mishell C. Clinical study of a progester- one-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;121:704–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillebaud J, Kasonde JM. Lost threads with intrauter- ine devices. Br Med J 1974;3:166–8
   Google Scholar
• Guillebaud J, Bonnar J, Morehead J, Mathews A. Menstrual blood loss with intrauterine devices. Lancet 1976;1:387–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel R, Shaw ST Jr, Martin MA. Comparative quantization of menstrual blood loss with the Lippes Loop, Dalkon Shield, and Copper-T intrauterine devices. Contraception 1974;10:63–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Zeng S, Sun B, et al. Menstrual blood loss, haemoglobin and ferritin concentration of Beijing women wearing steel ring, VCu200 and T Cu 220 IUCDs. Contraception 1986;28:329–36
   Google Scholar
• Leidholm P, Rybo G, Sjoberg N, Solvell L. Copper IUD: influence on menstrual blood-loss and iron deficiency. Contraception 1975;12:317–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmqvist R, Petersohn L, Bengtsson LP. Menstrual bleeding with copper-covered intrauterine contracep- tive devices. Contraception 1974;9:627–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datey S, Gaur LN, Saxena BN. Vaginal bleeding patterns of women using different contraceptive methods (implants, injectables, IUCDs, oral pills) – an Indian experience: an ICMR Task Force Study. Indian Council of Medical Research. Contraception 1995;51:155–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prema K, Gayatri TL, Phillips FS. Long term use of CuT 200. J Obstet Gynaecol India 1978;28:941–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sivin I, Alvarez F, Diaz J, et al. Intrauterine Contra- ceptive with copper and with levonorgestrel: randomized study of the T Cu 380A and Levonorgestrel 20 mg/day devices. Contraception 1984;30:443–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snowden R. General assessment of Multiload Cu250 intrauterine device: UK Network of IUD Research Clinics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;Suppl.4:58–65
   Google Scholar
• Thiery M, Van Kets H, Van Der Pas H, et al. The MLCu 250: clinical experience in Belgium and the Nether- lands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; Suppl 4:51–3
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. Task Force on Intrauterine Device for Fertility Regulation: Interval IUCD Inser- tion in Porous Women: a randomized multicentre comparative trial of Lippes D, TCu220 and Copper 7. Contraception 1982;26:1–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho J, Wu Z, Cai S, et al. A randomized cooperative trial of the ML Cu375, T Cu 220 C, steel ring and uterine cavity shaped IUCDs. Adv Contracept 1992;8:161–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sivin I, Mahgoub SE, McCarthy T, et al. Long-term contraception with the levonogestrel 20 mcg/day (LNG 20) and the Copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study. Contraception 1990;42:361–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz J, Pinto Neto AM, et al. Performance of the Copper-T 200 in parous adolescents: are copper IUCDs suitable for these women? Contraception 1993;48:23–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Feldblum PJ, Chi IC, Farr MG. Risk factors for copper T expulsion: an epidemiological analysis. Contraception 1992;46:427–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struthers BJ. Copper IUDs, PID, and fertility in nulliparous women. Adv Contraception 1991;7:211–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wentz AC, Jones HW III, Burnett LS. In Novak’s Textbook of Gynaecology, 11th edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1988: 229
   Google Scholar
• Moreno L, Goldman N. Contraceptive failure rates in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. Int Fam Plann Perspect 1991;17:55–84
   Google Scholar
• Snowden R. The Progestasert and ectopic pregnancy. Br Med J 1977;4:1601–2
   Google Scholar
• Suchdeva JK, Boparai SK, Taniya BK. Retention of IUCD. J Obstet Gynaecol India 1980; 30: 689–95
   Google Scholar
• Foreman H, Stadel BV, Schlesselman S. Intrauterine device usage and fetal loss. Obstet Gynecol 1981;58:669–77
   Google Scholar
• Sivin I, Schmidt F. Effectiveness of IUDs: a review. Contraception 1987;36:55–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORG. Family Planning Practices in India. First All India Survey. Baroda: Operation Research Group, 1970
   Google Scholar
• ORG. Family Planning Practices in India. Third All India Survey. New Delhi: Operation Research Group, 1991
   Google Scholar